March 26, 2025
Innovation & Policy with Sudip Parikh

With support from the Institute of Museum and Library Services, AMSEcast is celebrating 250 years of American innovation with expert interviews. CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and executive publisher of Science, Dr....
With support from the Institute of Museum and Library Services, AMSEcast is celebrating 250 years of American innovation with expert interviews. CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and executive publisher of Science, Dr. Sudip Parikh joins Alan on this episode to explore the forces shaping scientific progress. He highlights interdisciplinary collaboration, the impact of immigration on innovation, and the need for clear communication in securing research funding. Dr. Parikh also discusses the evolution of U.S. science policy, the role of private investment, and the importance of modernizing dissemination methods. He stresses inspiring future scientists and reducing financial barriers in STEM to sustain American leadership in research and discovery.
Guest Bio
Dr. Sudip Parikh is the 19th CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and executive publisher of the Science family of journals, a role he assumed in January 2020. With a background in journalism and materials science from the University of North Carolina and a PhD in macromolecular structure and chemistry from the Scripps Research Institute, Dr. Parikh has built a distinguished career at the intersection of science and policy. He has served as a science advisor to the Senate Appropriations Committee, vice president at Battelle, and senior VP at DIA Global, shaping science policy and innovation.
Show Highlights
- (2:01) What Dr. Parikh thinks are the primary instigators of innovation and the primary obstacles
- (6:20) The role of immigration in bringing new ideas to the United States
- (8:20) Sudip’s experience gathering support for scientific innovation when working in Washington, D.C.
- (12:55) Specific policies from Washington that helped spur innovation
- (16:06) How to strike a balance between disruptive innovations while maintaining our infrastructure and systems
- (17:43) Dr. Parikh’s role as the publisher of the Science family of journals in bringing new ideas to the table versus making small changes
- (20:18) What processes will have to change for Science and other journals moving forward
- (22:15) The best ways to inspire that next generation of scientists, engineers, and innovators
Transcript
1
00:00:04,040 --> 00:00:07,840
Welcome to AMSEcast, coming to you from Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
2
00:00:08,179 --> 00:00:11,500
a global leader in science, technology, and innovation.
3
00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:15,309
My name is Alan Lowe, director of the American Museum
4
00:00:15,339 --> 00:00:18,740
of Science and Energy, and the K-25 History Center.
5
00:00:19,690 --> 00:00:23,080
Each episode of AMSEcast presents world-renowned authors,
6
00:00:23,530 --> 00:00:27,490
scientists, historians, policymakers, and everyone in between,
7
00:00:27,929 --> 00:00:31,160
sharing their insights on a variety of fascinating topics.
8
00:00:36,760 --> 00:00:39,280
Welcome to a special edition of AMSEcast as
9
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:42,360
we celebrate 250 years of American innovation.
10
00:00:42,540 --> 00:00:46,480
With much appreciated support from the Institute of Museum and Library Services,
11
00:00:46,480 --> 00:00:51,879
or IMLS, we’re undertaking a series of AMSEcast interviews focusing on American
12
00:00:51,880 --> 00:00:56,720
innovations as part of our commemoration of the nation’s semi-quincentennial.
13
00:00:57,070 --> 00:00:59,150
On this episode, I’m honored to be joined in
14
00:00:59,150 --> 00:01:02,460
person in Washington, D.C. By Dr. Sudip Parikh.
15
00:01:02,650 --> 00:01:06,170
With undergraduate studies in journalism, and then in materials science at
16
00:01:06,170 --> 00:01:10,559
University of North Carolina, and his PhD in macromolecular structure and
17
00:01:10,559 --> 00:01:15,530
chemistry at the Scripps Research Institute, Sudip has an amazing career
18
00:01:15,730 --> 00:01:19,010
that’s included service as science advisor to the Senate Appropriations
19
00:01:19,010 --> 00:01:23,189
Committee, as vice president at Battelle, senior vice president and managing
20
00:01:23,190 --> 00:01:28,949
director at DIA global, and today as the 19th chief executive officer of the
21
00:01:28,949 --> 00:01:33,850
American Association for the Advancement of Science, or AAAS, and executive
22
00:01:33,850 --> 00:01:38,330
publisher of the Science family of journals, a post who began in January 2020.
23
00:01:38,910 --> 00:01:40,960
Sudip, thanks so much for joining us on the AMSEcast.
24
00:01:41,099 --> 00:01:41,990
Thanks so much for having me.
25
00:01:41,990 --> 00:01:42,860
I’m honored to be here.
26
00:01:42,929 --> 00:01:44,160
It’s a real, real pleasure.
27
00:01:44,770 --> 00:01:49,280
You’ve had such an amazing career that’s touched on so many points of science
28
00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:53,370
and engineering, I kind of thought we would look at our key theme of innovation
29
00:01:53,370 --> 00:01:56,800
by approaching it in three big buckets, if that’s all right with [laugh] you.
30
00:01:57,139 --> 00:02:01,940
So, kind of, dissemination of information, advocacy, and product development.
31
00:02:01,950 --> 00:02:04,789
So, I know you were an expert in developing
32
00:02:04,789 --> 00:02:08,100
a host of healthcare products and therapies.
33
00:02:08,180 --> 00:02:11,450
When you were in that business, what did you find were the primary
34
00:02:11,460 --> 00:02:15,229
instigators of innovation, and what were the primary obstacles to innovation?
35
00:02:15,469 --> 00:02:16,410
That’s a great question.
36
00:02:16,730 --> 00:02:20,150
The instigators were really when disciplines got together.
37
00:02:20,200 --> 00:02:22,780
That’s where it got exciting, particularly at a place like Battelle.
38
00:02:23,079 --> 00:02:26,850
When you can bring together molecular biologists and engineers,
39
00:02:27,000 --> 00:02:30,750
and you can build a device to deliver a medicine, it’s exciting.
40
00:02:30,770 --> 00:02:33,390
And it’s exciting for the basic part of it,
41
00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:34,929
which is, I just love great engineering.
42
00:02:34,940 --> 00:02:38,329
You know, seeing a little gadget that can make something happen in a perfectly
43
00:02:38,330 --> 00:02:42,830
precise way every time, no matter who does it, is a feat of engineering.
44
00:02:43,030 --> 00:02:46,579
And then there’s the audacity of thinking that we can work with
45
00:02:46,590 --> 00:02:51,900
molecules, at the molecular level, in living things and fix things.
46
00:02:51,950 --> 00:02:54,509
There’s an audacity to that that’s incredible.
47
00:02:54,509 --> 00:02:56,220
And so, you put those things together, and
48
00:02:56,220 --> 00:02:58,660
you realize the power that is in our hands.
49
00:02:58,660 --> 00:03:00,119
And then you think, my gosh, what if we brought
50
00:03:00,119 --> 00:03:01,799
together four or five of those disciplines?
51
00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:06,260
What if, in the mix, you add computational power, AI now?
52
00:03:06,260 --> 00:03:08,330
You know, there’s just so much that comes together
53
00:03:08,330 --> 00:03:09,630
when you bring these disciplines together.
54
00:03:09,630 --> 00:03:10,730
So, that’s the instigators.
55
00:03:11,160 --> 00:03:13,179
Things to hold you back: silos.
56
00:03:13,210 --> 00:03:16,329
You know, in every organization, no matter how wonderful they
57
00:03:16,329 --> 00:03:19,200
are, you have silos that build between these disciplines.
58
00:03:19,530 --> 00:03:23,100
Some of those silos are real in terms of walls and buildings, and some of them
59
00:03:23,290 --> 00:03:26,930
are in our minds, which is the jargon that we have to create for precision.
60
00:03:27,400 --> 00:03:31,660
And so, how do we lower those real barriers and those virtual barriers?
61
00:03:31,969 --> 00:03:34,530
And at a place like Battelle, one of the things we did for the physical
62
00:03:34,530 --> 00:03:36,520
barriers was just to say, hey, we’re all going to be in a room.
63
00:03:36,520 --> 00:03:39,250
We’d have big rooms that you could set up in any way
64
00:03:39,250 --> 00:03:42,110
you wanted, and the teams would all be based there.
65
00:03:42,160 --> 00:03:44,359
You bring the molecular biologists and engineers into the same
66
00:03:44,360 --> 00:03:47,940
room, so you could break down the concrete walls that way.
67
00:03:48,259 --> 00:03:49,719
The mental barriers are harder.
68
00:03:50,099 --> 00:03:52,649
They require actually spending time together and getting to know one
69
00:03:52,650 --> 00:03:55,829
another, and talking over a table, maybe while you’re having lunch,
70
00:03:56,100 --> 00:03:59,720
and seeing, oh, now I see what that three letter acronym means.
71
00:03:59,720 --> 00:04:01,370
It actually is something relatively simple.
72
00:04:01,620 --> 00:04:02,960
I just needed to understand that.
73
00:04:02,960 --> 00:04:05,260
And that can happen over time, and I think we’ve got
74
00:04:05,260 --> 00:04:06,890
to do more of it if we’re going to get more innovation.
75
00:04:07,160 --> 00:04:09,709
I think in this day and age, too, not to sound like the old
76
00:04:09,740 --> 00:04:12,950
guy here, but as we do social media, and emails, and that
77
00:04:12,950 --> 00:04:15,540
type of thing, in terms of our communications, that back
78
00:04:15,540 --> 00:04:18,680
and forth over the lunch table, I think, is getting less.
79
00:04:18,880 --> 00:04:20,679
So, how do we keep those silos, if we break them
80
00:04:20,679 --> 00:04:22,940
down, how we keep them broken down is a challenge.
81
00:04:23,270 --> 00:04:26,050
There’s so many things that I can—you know, we sort of look down
82
00:04:26,050 --> 00:04:29,530
on social media sometimes, but, you know, it’s a great start.
83
00:04:29,740 --> 00:04:30,569
It’s a great start.
84
00:04:30,570 --> 00:04:31,770
It’s a great exposure.
85
00:04:31,900 --> 00:04:34,930
In the right spaces, social media is a wonderful place for a
86
00:04:34,930 --> 00:04:38,219
biologist to interact with an ecologist to interact with a physicist.
87
00:04:38,720 --> 00:04:40,070
But then there’s going to be a next step.
88
00:04:40,230 --> 00:04:42,979
And that next step really requires some real time
89
00:04:42,980 --> 00:04:45,090
together, where you can get to know one another.
90
00:04:45,360 --> 00:04:47,960
And there’s also that bond of trust that you create when you do that.
91
00:04:47,990 --> 00:04:51,180
When you create that bond of trust, then it’s fun to have an intellectual
92
00:04:51,270 --> 00:04:56,660
exploration of what’s possible, and it’s hard to do that over 180 characters.
93
00:04:57,000 --> 00:04:57,450
And you’re right.
94
00:04:57,450 --> 00:04:59,260
I’ve seen this in just about every field.
95
00:04:59,790 --> 00:05:03,530
Before I ran science museums, as I told you, I ran presidential museums, and
96
00:05:03,770 --> 00:05:07,750
great staff members, but silos would develop just almost naturally over time.
97
00:05:07,890 --> 00:05:10,180
So, how you are aware of that, how you break
98
00:05:10,180 --> 00:05:12,539
those down and keep them down is important.
99
00:05:12,550 --> 00:05:14,860
So, I want to get to AAAS.
100
00:05:15,809 --> 00:05:19,780
Can you tell us a bit about what AAAS is, when it was created, and what it does?
101
00:05:19,960 --> 00:05:22,340
The AAAS, the American Association for the Advancement
102
00:05:22,340 --> 00:05:26,650
of Science, was created in 1848, 176 years ago.
103
00:05:26,990 --> 00:05:29,740
It was founded by a group of scientists in the United States who
104
00:05:29,740 --> 00:05:32,560
wanted to get together and talk about science, and they modeled
105
00:05:32,560 --> 00:05:35,349
it after the British Association for the Advancement of Science.
106
00:05:35,469 --> 00:05:38,510
87 of them got together in Philadelphia—they were all guys because
107
00:05:38,520 --> 00:05:42,905
it was 1848—remember, this pre-Civil War, right, so anytime you
108
00:05:42,930 --> 00:05:46,000
have an organization that’s 176 years old, they are of their time.
109
00:05:46,410 --> 00:05:50,039
Now, the thing I like to talk about with AAAS is that over that 176
110
00:05:50,050 --> 00:05:55,340
years, it has both had evolution and revolution so that it is still
111
00:05:55,340 --> 00:06:00,650
relevant, and I would say, boldly at the front of innovation, and also
112
00:06:01,020 --> 00:06:05,410
in creating a scientific enterprise that looks like America and that
113
00:06:05,410 --> 00:06:08,560
takes advantage of the creativity that comes from a diversity of thought.
114
00:06:08,630 --> 00:06:10,630
And so, that’s happened through evolution and revolution.
115
00:06:11,010 --> 00:06:14,740
I know, talking about the evolution of creativity in America
116
00:06:14,740 --> 00:06:18,909
and what makes America unique in that way—in many ways, I
117
00:06:18,910 --> 00:06:22,840
think—what do you think the role of immigration has been of
118
00:06:22,870 --> 00:06:27,039
getting in new ideas from around the world into this nation?
119
00:06:27,360 --> 00:06:30,009
The United States has such an amazing story.
120
00:06:30,050 --> 00:06:32,680
I love everything about the story of
121
00:06:32,719 --> 00:06:35,809
immigration, and the beacon that this country is.
122
00:06:35,889 --> 00:06:40,900
It has drawn folks for, you know, two centuries, over two centuries, and
123
00:06:40,920 --> 00:06:44,600
when you look at the innovations that have happened in the country, they
124
00:06:44,600 --> 00:06:49,250
are a mix of both people that are here and people that have immigrated here.
125
00:06:49,420 --> 00:06:54,680
They are a mix of hard work and sweat that must happen after an idea.
126
00:06:54,880 --> 00:06:56,390
That doesn’t happen just because you have an I—there’s
127
00:06:57,000 --> 00:06:58,890
a bazillion ideas out there; most of them never amount
128
00:06:58,900 --> 00:07:00,930
to anything because people don’t follow through.
129
00:07:01,460 --> 00:07:02,960
This is a place where you can do that.
130
00:07:03,179 --> 00:07:06,209
It’s a place where it’s encouraged, and it’s a place that, over the
131
00:07:06,210 --> 00:07:10,210
past 80 years, we’ve also said we’re going to support science and
132
00:07:10,230 --> 00:07:12,680
the scientific enterprise, and we’re going to support technology.
133
00:07:13,010 --> 00:07:17,330
And when you put that mix together—Ronald Reagan had a great quote at his very
134
00:07:17,330 --> 00:07:20,629
last speech where he says, you know, “There’s one thing to celebrate about
135
00:07:20,630 --> 00:07:24,070
America is this, which is that, you know, when you move to another country,
136
00:07:24,270 --> 00:07:27,050
you can be a person in that country, and you can even participate in it, but
137
00:07:27,050 --> 00:07:30,149
when you move to America, no matter where you are from in the world, you can be
138
00:07:30,150 --> 00:07:34,090
an American.” And that’s why you end up with an organization that’s 176 years
139
00:07:34,090 --> 00:07:39,729
old and has a CEO named Sudip Parikh, and has a board that is majority women.
140
00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:43,580
And it’s still Nobel Prize winners, it’s still National Academy
141
00:07:43,580 --> 00:07:47,259
members, it’s still leaders in scientific fields, but it changes
142
00:07:47,260 --> 00:07:51,159
over time because this country has this great aspiration, and that
143
00:07:51,690 --> 00:07:57,030
aspiration is powerful, it’s inspiring, and it’s never quite reached.
144
00:07:57,500 --> 00:08:00,740
It’s always asymptotic, right, if I’m talking to scientists.
145
00:08:01,020 --> 00:08:03,420
We’re never going to reach perfection, but we’re always going
146
00:08:03,420 --> 00:08:05,319
to be working harder to make it just a little bit better.
147
00:08:05,580 --> 00:08:07,110
And sometimes we have setbacks.
148
00:08:07,440 --> 00:08:11,420
Immigration is a key part of that story, and it’s a part of the story that I
149
00:08:11,420 --> 00:08:16,200
hope we never change because it is, you know, when you’re calling on 7 billion
150
00:08:16,200 --> 00:08:19,719
people from around the world for creative talent, it’s amazing what’s possible.
151
00:08:20,120 --> 00:08:21,450
You had service on Capitol Hill.
152
00:08:21,450 --> 00:08:24,140
We’re sitting here in Washington, D.C. Today, and we talk
153
00:08:24,150 --> 00:08:28,690
about America, this being our wonderful nation’s capital.
154
00:08:28,930 --> 00:08:30,620
When you worked here, what did you find were the key
155
00:08:30,620 --> 00:08:34,070
elements when you were working with members of Congress?
156
00:08:34,389 --> 00:08:36,809
How did you garner support for innovation?
157
00:08:37,530 --> 00:08:41,630
Because innovation, by definition, can be risky, unknown.
158
00:08:42,039 --> 00:08:44,510
How did that work with folks who most likely
159
00:08:44,510 --> 00:08:46,320
were not coming from a scientific background?
160
00:08:46,830 --> 00:08:49,870
Yeah, you know, most of our politicians are lawyers or
161
00:08:49,890 --> 00:08:53,589
business people by background, and what I found, though, is
162
00:08:53,610 --> 00:08:58,449
that in Congress, most if not all, would tell you they support
163
00:08:58,570 --> 00:09:01,089
research and development, they support science and technology.
164
00:09:01,520 --> 00:09:04,180
But then there were champions, and that was really critical.
165
00:09:04,190 --> 00:09:07,290
There are some folks who would make this their number one issue to
166
00:09:07,290 --> 00:09:10,760
say, I want to see more funding go into research and development.
167
00:09:10,910 --> 00:09:13,579
I want to see investment in basic research.
168
00:09:13,980 --> 00:09:15,960
And that’s where the conversation had to happen, which
169
00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:18,630
is, how do you have a conversation about basic research?
170
00:09:18,660 --> 00:09:21,520
How do you do that in a way that makes sense to folks?
171
00:09:21,960 --> 00:09:24,220
And what I found is that, as scientists and engineers,
172
00:09:24,220 --> 00:09:27,640
we’re taught to be both precise and accurate, right?
173
00:09:27,660 --> 00:09:30,819
It’s that whole thing about a target, and if you’re precise, the three
174
00:09:30,820 --> 00:09:33,509
arrows end up right on top of each other, and if you’re accurate,
175
00:09:33,530 --> 00:09:35,960
they also end up in the middle of the target, in the bull’s eye.
176
00:09:36,039 --> 00:09:37,320
And we’re taught to be both.
177
00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:39,440
We want all three arrows in the center of that target.
178
00:09:40,070 --> 00:09:42,680
But to have precision requires having jargon.
179
00:09:43,030 --> 00:09:47,390
It requires being able to talk about things in very specific ways, and when
180
00:09:47,390 --> 00:09:51,829
you do that, you are unintentionally creating a barrier to communication.
181
00:09:52,500 --> 00:09:55,699
And so, you have to realize that when you’re talking in terms of policy
182
00:09:55,700 --> 00:09:59,130
or you’re talking to politicians, you have to modulate, do I need
183
00:09:59,130 --> 00:10:02,250
to be precise in this conversation, do I need to be accurate in this
184
00:10:02,250 --> 00:10:05,679
conversation, and how much can I modulate it so I can get the point across?
185
00:10:06,090 --> 00:10:09,400
And so, you know, examples of that are, if you’re talking about an
186
00:10:09,400 --> 00:10:13,310
experiment in biology and you want to use the name of a molecule, my gosh,
187
00:10:13,310 --> 00:10:16,420
those names, you know, as a structural biologist, I get confused by them.
188
00:10:16,580 --> 00:10:20,780
And so, you have to take that and say, is that important to this conversation?
189
00:10:21,150 --> 00:10:22,480
And one of the things that came out while I was
190
00:10:22,480 --> 00:10:24,489
in Congress was the structure of the ribosome.
191
00:10:24,910 --> 00:10:29,250
Now, the ribosome is a beautiful molecule that is really critical to life.
192
00:10:29,619 --> 00:10:30,870
Life doesn’t exist without it.
193
00:10:31,130 --> 00:10:34,829
And the beautiful thing that was learned at that time was that
194
00:10:34,840 --> 00:10:38,940
the protein is gigantic, but actually the thing that does the
195
00:10:38,940 --> 00:10:44,360
catalysis, where the critical reaction happens, is done by RNA.
196
00:10:44,430 --> 00:10:47,709
And there’s something profound about that.
197
00:10:47,760 --> 00:10:52,550
What it tells us is that reaction critical to life began with RNA,
198
00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:57,699
not protein, and what that means is that there’s implications for
199
00:10:58,270 --> 00:11:01,440
the development of life overall, there’s implications for medicine.
200
00:11:01,870 --> 00:11:04,409
And so, I took this to one of the senators, and I said, “Gosh, Senator, look
201
00:11:04,410 --> 00:11:07,050
at this. This is the structure of the ribosome. Look what it’s telling us.
202
00:11:07,100 --> 00:11:09,900
It has all these implications about life.” And the senator
203
00:11:09,900 --> 00:11:11,400
looked at me and said, “Sudip, that’s a great thing.
204
00:11:11,400 --> 00:11:14,990
It’s a great argument for an agency that’s a few billion dollars, but
205
00:11:14,990 --> 00:11:19,130
the National Institutes of Health is a, at that time, $24 billion agency.
206
00:11:19,270 --> 00:11:19,990
Tell me something else.
207
00:11:20,020 --> 00:11:20,780
Tell me something more.”
208
00:11:21,230 --> 00:11:23,799
And you know, you can say that, well, gosh, the ribosome is different in
209
00:11:23,799 --> 00:11:27,600
different species and in different—germs versus humans—and I said germs, right?
210
00:11:27,600 --> 00:11:29,970
You don’t say [unintelligible] . You say germs—and suddenly you
211
00:11:29,970 --> 00:11:34,010
realize, ah, it can be the basis for therapies and treatments.
212
00:11:34,270 --> 00:11:36,330
And suddenly it becomes valuable for a $24
213
00:11:36,570 --> 00:11:38,589
billion agency, not a $7 billion agency.
214
00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:41,510
You have to be able to have those kinds of conversations, be able to
215
00:11:41,510 --> 00:11:45,260
modulate precision and accuracy for what you’re trying to accomplish.
216
00:11:45,790 --> 00:11:48,290
Always curious, those champions you talk about on Capitol Hill.
217
00:11:48,300 --> 00:11:50,180
What differentiates them?
218
00:11:50,190 --> 00:11:51,580
Why do they become champions?
219
00:11:51,580 --> 00:11:54,789
Is it a matter of personal interest, constituencies,
220
00:11:54,790 --> 00:11:56,970
that type of thing, or is it something else?
221
00:11:57,339 --> 00:12:00,269
You know, it can be a unique story every time.
222
00:12:00,279 --> 00:12:02,170
Sometimes it is the fact that they happen to
223
00:12:02,170 --> 00:12:05,510
represent a district that has a large facility in it.
224
00:12:05,590 --> 00:12:08,829
You know, usually the person who represents Oak Ridge is a champion
225
00:12:08,830 --> 00:12:11,910
for the Department of Energy, almost always, Democrat or Republican.
226
00:12:12,210 --> 00:12:13,279
So, that’s one way.
227
00:12:13,520 --> 00:12:15,760
The other is that they have a story.
228
00:12:15,990 --> 00:12:18,700
For example, in support of biomedical research, they might have a story
229
00:12:18,700 --> 00:12:21,689
in their family where biomedical research has made a difference, and that
230
00:12:21,690 --> 00:12:25,870
becomes a powerful source of their entry into support for the sciences.
231
00:12:26,059 --> 00:12:28,530
And then in other cases, it is just that they happened to
232
00:12:28,530 --> 00:12:31,219
be put on a committee that they didn’t even realize what it
233
00:12:31,219 --> 00:12:34,130
was, and they learned about it, and they became intrigued.
234
00:12:34,199 --> 00:12:35,330
And we see that all the time.
235
00:12:35,330 --> 00:12:37,490
You know, the current ranking member on the House Science
236
00:12:37,490 --> 00:12:40,720
Committee is Frank Lucas, a wonderful member of Congress.
237
00:12:40,740 --> 00:12:44,120
He will tell you, you know, he’s a farmer, and he’s also one of
238
00:12:44,120 --> 00:12:46,859
the best champions of science that we have in Congress because
239
00:12:46,860 --> 00:12:50,510
he recognizes the value of science and technology to the country.
240
00:12:50,719 --> 00:12:53,270
As a former farm boy, I can tell you, I’m proud of that.
241
00:12:53,279 --> 00:12:57,760
That’s great [laugh] . So, from your experience again on Capitol Hill, if you
242
00:12:57,780 --> 00:13:01,900
look back at our history, are there any specific policies you see that came
243
00:13:01,900 --> 00:13:06,399
out of Washington, you say were really important to helping spur innovation?
244
00:13:06,740 --> 00:13:10,149
Those of us in science policy, we all point back to 1945 and we
245
00:13:10,150 --> 00:13:13,370
point back to Vannevar Bush who was working for Roosevelt, and
246
00:13:13,370 --> 00:13:16,579
in 1945 he basically wrote himself a letter with some questions,
247
00:13:16,580 --> 00:13:20,090
and had Roosevelt sign it, and then he answered those questions,
248
00:13:20,150 --> 00:13:22,640
and that turned into something called the Endless Frontier.
249
00:13:22,700 --> 00:13:27,000
And it basically describes the model that we’ve built upon ever since then,
250
00:13:27,009 --> 00:13:31,610
which is this idea that the government ought to fund basic research, that basic
251
00:13:31,610 --> 00:13:35,635
research ought to be carried out, for the most part in academia, and that at
252
00:13:35,640 --> 00:13:39,710
the same time, would be training a future workforce, and that as discovery
253
00:13:39,710 --> 00:13:43,120
happened, the industry and the private sector would take it from there and turn
254
00:13:43,120 --> 00:13:46,930
it into products for consumers, and for the nation, and for national security.
255
00:13:47,100 --> 00:13:51,720
Now, that’s a beautiful idea in 1945, and we often give it too much credit.
256
00:13:52,110 --> 00:13:54,959
And one of the things that I say is that Vannevar Bush
257
00:13:55,230 --> 00:13:57,600
would be blown away if he saw the enterprise that we have
258
00:13:57,600 --> 00:14:00,089
today because it looks nothing like what he described.
259
00:14:00,099 --> 00:14:04,520
In fact, we have built organically on top of it, a much more beautiful,
260
00:14:04,539 --> 00:14:07,750
much more powerful, much more profound scientific enterprise.
261
00:14:08,150 --> 00:14:11,500
That enterprise has federal investment as heat and light,
262
00:14:11,730 --> 00:14:15,589
about $200 billion a year of federal investment, but then it
263
00:14:15,599 --> 00:14:20,099
has private sector investment of around $700 billion a year.
264
00:14:20,290 --> 00:14:21,870
Now, Buch never imagined that.
265
00:14:21,880 --> 00:14:23,520
He never imagined there’d be $700 billion
266
00:14:23,520 --> 00:14:26,209
worth of investment by the private sector.
267
00:14:26,480 --> 00:14:28,810
And philanthropy: billions of dollars of
268
00:14:28,810 --> 00:14:31,220
investment by philanthropy, he never imagined that.
269
00:14:31,530 --> 00:14:34,140
That higher education would take on roles related
270
00:14:34,140 --> 00:14:36,430
to product development, he never imagined that.
271
00:14:36,859 --> 00:14:40,460
And so, one of the things that I’ve become really an advocate for is
272
00:14:40,460 --> 00:14:44,710
to say, yes, we should give proper credit to that time in 1945, and the
273
00:14:44,710 --> 00:14:48,340
policies that were created then, but we also have to recognize what the
274
00:14:48,340 --> 00:14:52,910
enterprise looks like today, so that we can make the right kinds of policy
275
00:14:53,120 --> 00:14:56,730
prescriptions and recommendations that are needed to get us to the future.
276
00:14:56,990 --> 00:15:00,059
What got us to today, all those wonderful policy prescriptions
277
00:15:00,059 --> 00:15:03,200
that got us to today are not going to help us win the future.
278
00:15:03,460 --> 00:15:04,750
They’re not going to get us to where we need
279
00:15:04,750 --> 00:15:06,949
to be, and so we’ve got to recognize that.
280
00:15:06,950 --> 00:15:11,720
And so, when I think of what is a great policy prescription, one is just money.
281
00:15:12,840 --> 00:15:17,069
This country has been an incredible supporter of science and
282
00:15:17,070 --> 00:15:19,890
technology, like the world has never seen before, and what
283
00:15:19,890 --> 00:15:22,510
that’s meant is other countries are now following us, right?
284
00:15:22,530 --> 00:15:25,300
They’ve seen the power that comes from that because they
285
00:15:25,300 --> 00:15:27,610
recognize that economic growth, normally—when you’re
286
00:15:27,610 --> 00:15:29,860
an economist, you say it comes from a couple things.
287
00:15:30,080 --> 00:15:32,459
One is it comes from the growth of population.
288
00:15:32,630 --> 00:15:33,800
It comes from demographics.
289
00:15:33,980 --> 00:15:36,169
You get incremental growth because you added another person.
290
00:15:36,680 --> 00:15:40,740
The other way is a rise in productivity, which is that, hey, those people
291
00:15:40,760 --> 00:15:43,890
can do more stuff and make more stuff, and that increases your economy.
292
00:15:44,429 --> 00:15:47,220
But there’s another thing, and that is science and technology.
293
00:15:47,230 --> 00:15:48,390
It’s a wild card.
294
00:15:48,450 --> 00:15:52,610
It can lead to step function changes in economic growth.
295
00:15:52,910 --> 00:15:55,780
And if you can get step function changes in economic growth, you can
296
00:15:55,780 --> 00:15:59,150
build a society that goes to the Moon, that goes to Mars, that cures
297
00:15:59,150 --> 00:16:03,030
disease, that feeds eight billion people, you can do that when you
298
00:16:03,030 --> 00:16:06,339
have that kind of disruption, which is what the country invented.
299
00:16:06,580 --> 00:16:10,400
Our good friend, Guru Madhavan, who helped connect us here today,
300
00:16:10,500 --> 00:16:14,620
has spoken pretty eloquently to me in the past on AMSEcast about
301
00:16:14,840 --> 00:16:19,250
striking a balance between innovation and maintaining current
302
00:16:19,300 --> 00:16:22,760
systems and infrastructure, and how we do that moving forward.
303
00:16:22,760 --> 00:16:25,919
So, how do you see us striking that balance of having those disruptive
304
00:16:25,920 --> 00:16:30,650
innovations but also maintaining our infrastructure and systems that we have?
305
00:16:31,059 --> 00:16:32,859
It’s a really critical question.
306
00:16:32,980 --> 00:16:36,730
In 1945, if you’d asked somebody in policy, they would say,
307
00:16:36,730 --> 00:16:38,530
“Well, gosh, the federal government is in charge of the
308
00:16:38,530 --> 00:16:41,620
infrastructure.” Oak Ridge, Lawrence Livermore, Los Alamos,
309
00:16:42,080 --> 00:16:44,440
these are the places where big infrastructure is going to be.
310
00:16:44,759 --> 00:16:48,229
Big telescopes at Arecibo and elsewhere are going to be government funded.
311
00:16:48,670 --> 00:16:51,180
When you look at it from the point of view of 2024, we have to
312
00:16:51,180 --> 00:16:54,630
realize that infrastructure, now because of the fact that the private
313
00:16:54,630 --> 00:16:57,870
sector is also investing, some of that infrastructure that is the
314
00:16:57,880 --> 00:17:01,230
backbone of our technology, whether it’s the internet, artificial
315
00:17:01,230 --> 00:17:05,690
intelligence, or even in biology, is coming from the private sector.
316
00:17:06,039 --> 00:17:10,430
We have to be recognizing that there has to be a level of coordination
317
00:17:10,530 --> 00:17:13,810
and situational awareness between the federal government, and
318
00:17:13,819 --> 00:17:17,520
industry, and philanthropy that has never been seen before.
319
00:17:17,889 --> 00:17:20,469
Because we have to know what is the linchpin of
320
00:17:20,480 --> 00:17:23,079
this particular area of science and technology?
321
00:17:23,240 --> 00:17:25,180
We have to understand well, who’s supporting that?
322
00:17:25,520 --> 00:17:29,440
Who is making sure that if we are wanting to make our
323
00:17:29,440 --> 00:17:33,109
grid dependent upon lithium, where are we getting that?
324
00:17:33,139 --> 00:17:34,770
Is somebody taking care of the supply chain?
325
00:17:34,790 --> 00:17:35,790
Who is looking at all that?
326
00:17:36,059 --> 00:17:39,199
And in the past, we allowed that to happen organically, but we
327
00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:41,280
can’t do that anymore, and that’s part of what I mean when I
328
00:17:41,280 --> 00:17:43,610
say that what got us to here isn’t going to get us to there.
329
00:17:43,890 --> 00:17:48,060
As the publisher of the Science family of journals, as we talk about these
330
00:17:48,060 --> 00:17:52,860
ideas for the future, what do you see as your role of disseminating those ideas,
331
00:17:53,250 --> 00:17:57,769
versus talking about, kind of, incremental changes to our current knowledge?
332
00:17:57,770 --> 00:18:00,580
So, in terms of bringing radical new ideas, if that’s
333
00:18:00,580 --> 00:18:04,129
the right word, to the table, versus incremental changes.
334
00:18:04,360 --> 00:18:06,860
What a privilege it is, first of all, just let me say this out loud,
335
00:18:06,860 --> 00:18:09,639
it’s a privilege for me to get to be the executive publisher of Science.
336
00:18:09,960 --> 00:18:12,189
The journal was started by Thomas Edison in 1880.
337
00:18:12,320 --> 00:18:15,170
He gave the first $10,000 for it, and then when he got bored
338
00:18:15,170 --> 00:18:18,350
of it, Alexander Graham Bell gave the second $10,000 for it.
339
00:18:18,790 --> 00:18:23,560
And so, it has this rich history going back to 1880, and it is the
340
00:18:23,560 --> 00:18:27,760
manifestation of that idea of multidisciplinary science, right?
341
00:18:27,809 --> 00:18:31,570
It has every kind of science in it, and the front matter is really about,
342
00:18:31,580 --> 00:18:36,150
how do you synthesize that for a physicist to be able to learn about biology?
343
00:18:36,230 --> 00:18:38,730
And when you can do that, and when you can say, okay, there’s going to
344
00:18:38,730 --> 00:18:42,170
be incremental work that happens—and that might be published in Science.
345
00:18:42,170 --> 00:18:45,090
It might not be, might be published somewhere else—but when there are these
346
00:18:45,090 --> 00:18:50,160
moments of inspiration that come because of basic discovery, CRISPR, you
347
00:18:50,160 --> 00:18:53,549
know the idea that you can edit genes, and you can do it in a way that
348
00:18:53,549 --> 00:18:56,490
takes advantage of the human genome project that, you know, that we spent
349
00:18:56,740 --> 00:19:00,940
billions of dollars on, that only comes about when you’ve got people talking
350
00:19:00,940 --> 00:19:04,989
to one another across disciplines, and that happens at a place like Science.
351
00:19:04,989 --> 00:19:08,949
It’s not the only place, but I would say that we are wedded to the
352
00:19:08,950 --> 00:19:12,560
idea that communication, that dissemination, is critically important.
353
00:19:13,010 --> 00:19:16,430
We’re not wedded to the idea that it’s always going to be a paper magazine.
354
00:19:16,590 --> 00:19:17,600
I appreciate that.
355
00:19:17,900 --> 00:19:20,780
What I’ve learned is that anybody who has a small pox
356
00:19:20,780 --> 00:19:23,479
inoculation, so who has the scar on their arm from that, so
357
00:19:23,480 --> 00:19:26,350
that means they’re over 50, they like reading a paper magazine.
358
00:19:26,350 --> 00:19:27,639
That’s where they see the synthesis.
359
00:19:28,029 --> 00:19:30,349
What we’ve also learned is those of us who don’t have that
360
00:19:30,350 --> 00:19:34,230
smallpox vaccination, because we eradicated smallpox, those
361
00:19:34,230 --> 00:19:37,640
folks, they like to see that synthesis in a different way.
362
00:19:37,720 --> 00:19:38,890
They’re going to want to see it online.
363
00:19:38,900 --> 00:19:40,409
They’re going to want to see it through newsletters.
364
00:19:40,410 --> 00:19:42,100
They’re going to want to see it through social media.
365
00:19:42,570 --> 00:19:46,109
And so, we are wedded to the idea that synthesis has to
366
00:19:46,119 --> 00:19:49,060
happen, and that multidisciplinary science is the way forward,
367
00:19:49,060 --> 00:19:51,110
and it’s the only way we’re going to solve big problems.
368
00:19:51,410 --> 00:19:54,889
And we’re also, we are energized by the idea that it’s going
369
00:19:54,890 --> 00:19:57,570
to change radically over the next ten years and twenty years.
370
00:19:57,840 --> 00:20:00,580
Because it’s one of those things that happens like a phase transition.
371
00:20:00,650 --> 00:20:02,960
Those of us who read the magazine, we read it, we read it, we
372
00:20:02,960 --> 00:20:04,909
read it, and then all of a sudden, [snaps finger] it changes.
373
00:20:04,910 --> 00:20:06,880
I just snapped my finger, for those of you on the podcast.
374
00:20:07,270 --> 00:20:10,360
You know, it changes like that: it happens, slow, slow, slow, then fast.
375
00:20:10,530 --> 00:20:13,540
And we want to be at the vanguard of that because we recognize that if we can
376
00:20:13,830 --> 00:20:18,300
be involved in dissemination, then we can be a catalyst for what comes next.
377
00:20:18,599 --> 00:20:21,330
Is there a thought as you make that transition,
378
00:20:21,330 --> 00:20:23,269
that any process will have to change?
379
00:20:23,459 --> 00:20:26,530
I know peer reviewed; is that part of your process?
380
00:20:26,530 --> 00:20:30,090
Will that support, or perhaps not support talking
381
00:20:30,090 --> 00:20:32,509
about innovation, new things in the journals?
382
00:20:32,700 --> 00:20:36,540
It requires rethinking what stages are dissemination important?
383
00:20:36,540 --> 00:20:39,359
So, for example, pre-prints are before peer
384
00:20:39,360 --> 00:20:41,669
review, and they’re incredibly valuable.
385
00:20:41,930 --> 00:20:44,610
We are incredibly supportive of peer review, even though
386
00:20:44,610 --> 00:20:47,110
it happens before a paper ever gets to us at Science.
387
00:20:47,110 --> 00:20:50,850
And the reason we are is because we know that as people put their
388
00:20:50,850 --> 00:20:55,430
ideas up in a pre-print server, they can have a conversation online
389
00:20:55,630 --> 00:21:00,150
that is radically faster than what was imagined in the 1600s, right?
390
00:21:00,150 --> 00:21:02,660
In the 1600s, you’d write things down in a book, that book
391
00:21:02,660 --> 00:21:04,820
would get disseminated over the course of 20 years, and
392
00:21:04,820 --> 00:21:06,860
over the course of 20 years, you’d start to get feedback.
393
00:21:07,180 --> 00:21:09,560
We can take that down to 20 minutes because
394
00:21:09,560 --> 00:21:11,560
what can happen is you’re sharing that online.
395
00:21:11,820 --> 00:21:14,420
Now, that has to still be part of the story.
396
00:21:14,429 --> 00:21:15,540
There’s another part of the story, which
397
00:21:15,540 --> 00:21:16,950
is, how do you get to a version of record?
398
00:21:16,959 --> 00:21:19,240
How do you get to a place where, all right, this is the
399
00:21:19,240 --> 00:21:21,780
finished product for that, so that we can then use that for
400
00:21:21,780 --> 00:21:24,950
citations and for the formal part of getting science done?
401
00:21:25,220 --> 00:21:29,300
But we have to be able to think in terms of two things at once, which is
402
00:21:29,300 --> 00:21:32,480
that there is a need for that process, but there’s also a need for this
403
00:21:32,490 --> 00:21:36,880
fast, dynamic, in-the-moment communication of science because that’s how
404
00:21:36,880 --> 00:21:39,379
we’re going to get to vaccines faster, when needed; that’s how we’re going
405
00:21:39,380 --> 00:21:41,730
to get to treatments faster, when needed; that’s also how we’re going to
406
00:21:41,730 --> 00:21:45,560
solve big problems like, if you’ve got to temporarily build a bridge over
407
00:21:45,560 --> 00:21:48,830
a river because a boat ran into your bridge, how are you going to do that?
408
00:21:48,830 --> 00:21:51,279
And how are you going to crowdsource ideas to make that happen in the
409
00:21:51,280 --> 00:21:55,640
fastest way, and in the most efficient way, and in the most affordable way?
410
00:21:56,070 --> 00:21:58,690
So, you’re really talking about how we maintain this edge
411
00:21:58,690 --> 00:22:02,690
and innovation we’ve had for 250 years, for the next 250.
412
00:22:02,809 --> 00:22:03,399
Amen.
413
00:22:03,440 --> 00:22:04,600
I’m all about that.
414
00:22:04,610 --> 00:22:05,400
How are we going to do that?
415
00:22:05,400 --> 00:22:08,290
Because if people are copying what we’ve already done—and
416
00:22:08,290 --> 00:22:10,941
that’s great, we were leading for that very reason—now is
417
00:22:10,941 --> 00:22:12,720
the time to say, how are we going to stay at the vanguard?
418
00:22:13,330 --> 00:22:13,879
That’s right.
419
00:22:14,080 --> 00:22:14,920
Ask that question.
420
00:22:15,200 --> 00:22:18,800
My last question for you is related to that: we do so
421
00:22:18,800 --> 00:22:22,979
much work with K through 12 students at AMSE and K-25.
422
00:22:23,300 --> 00:22:25,880
What do you think are the best ways to inspire that next generation
423
00:22:25,880 --> 00:22:29,220
of scientists, engineers, and innovators as we move forward?
424
00:22:30,010 --> 00:22:31,330
I think that there are several things.
425
00:22:31,340 --> 00:22:36,110
One is, when you see great stuff, there’s nothing like seeing great engineering.
426
00:22:36,150 --> 00:22:40,410
When you see a beautiful bridge, when you see a rocket, when you see
427
00:22:40,450 --> 00:22:45,120
a robotic mission to a far off planet, there is nothing like that.
428
00:22:45,230 --> 00:22:46,889
And that’s what inspired me.
429
00:22:46,979 --> 00:22:48,570
That’s what inspired many others, I think.
430
00:22:48,720 --> 00:22:53,760
The other is when you see that person who’s doing that work in your community.
431
00:22:54,310 --> 00:22:57,260
When you recognize that we can see the mountains of Pluto.
432
00:22:57,340 --> 00:23:00,530
I love the fact that we know that there are methane-covered mountains on Pluto.
433
00:23:00,660 --> 00:23:02,600
That blows me away that we know that.
434
00:23:03,059 --> 00:23:05,730
And when you recognize that the person who made that possible is
435
00:23:05,730 --> 00:23:08,709
living in your community, or who grew up in your community, that
436
00:23:08,710 --> 00:23:11,199
makes a world of difference, to recognize there’s a connection
437
00:23:11,200 --> 00:23:15,410
between that thing that seems like magic, and it’s actually not magic.
438
00:23:15,670 --> 00:23:18,300
It’s math, and it’s physics, and it’s engineering.
439
00:23:18,400 --> 00:23:20,360
We want to be able to see that in our communities.
440
00:23:20,360 --> 00:23:22,819
And so, if we can do those two things, which is first of all, to inspire
441
00:23:22,820 --> 00:23:26,270
with great works, and then the second is to show that it’s human.
442
00:23:26,420 --> 00:23:27,430
It is human.
443
00:23:27,800 --> 00:23:31,350
And that there are some folks like Einstein who are extraordinary,
444
00:23:31,920 --> 00:23:36,250
but so much of this happens from humans that are flawed, we
445
00:23:36,250 --> 00:23:39,770
make mistakes, and yet we are inspired to do something great.
446
00:23:39,809 --> 00:23:43,949
We are inspired to do something that pushes humanity farther.
447
00:23:44,510 --> 00:23:47,670
And when you see that, how would you not want to be involved in science?
448
00:23:47,890 --> 00:23:49,600
Now, there’s a whole bunch of practical things involved,
449
00:23:49,600 --> 00:23:52,360
which is, we got to make it a better job, better profession.
450
00:23:52,580 --> 00:23:55,296
If you want to be an engineer, we shouldn’t make it to where you’ve got to be
451
00:23:55,296 --> 00:24:00,180
able to afford tuition at a high price to get to your first job in engineering.
452
00:24:00,400 --> 00:24:03,550
If you want to be in molecular biology or in the sciences, you
453
00:24:03,550 --> 00:24:06,620
shouldn’t have to realize that you have to wait ten years or twenty
454
00:24:06,620 --> 00:24:10,770
years before you get to your first investigator-initiated grant.
455
00:24:10,870 --> 00:24:13,590
We have to fix the things that are involved in the professions that make it
456
00:24:13,590 --> 00:24:17,720
harder and make it tougher for folks to be creative and innovative and lead.
457
00:24:18,270 --> 00:24:20,780
But the inspiration, my gosh, it’s all around us.
458
00:24:20,990 --> 00:24:23,260
Well, certainly an inspiring conversation today.
459
00:24:23,270 --> 00:24:25,180
Thank you so much for joining us in AMSEcast.
460
00:24:25,180 --> 00:24:26,500
I really enjoyed our conversation.
461
00:24:26,580 --> 00:24:27,080
It was terrific.
462
00:24:27,080 --> 00:24:27,899
Thank you so much.
463
00:24:32,830 --> 00:24:35,230
Thank you for joining us on this episode of AMSEcast.
464
00:24:35,940 --> 00:24:40,260
For more information on this topic or any others, you can always visit us at
465
00:24:40,520 --> 00:24:46,899
AMSE.org or find, like, and follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.
466
00:24:47,400 --> 00:24:49,729
I invite you to visit the American Museum of Science
467
00:24:49,730 --> 00:24:52,530
and Energy and the K-25 History Center in person.
468
00:24:52,850 --> 00:24:57,020
You can also shop at our online store and become a member at AMSE.org.
469
00:24:57,480 --> 00:25:00,920
Thanks to our production team with Matt Mullins, plus our supportive colleagues
470
00:25:00,920 --> 00:25:04,760
at the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, Office of Environmental
471
00:25:04,760 --> 00:25:08,740
Management, and Office of Legacy Management, as well as Oak Ridge National
472
00:25:08,740 --> 00:25:14,600
Laboratory, the Y-12 National Security Complex, NNSA, and the AMSE Foundation.
473
00:25:15,090 --> 00:25:16,830
And of course, thanks to our wonderful guests
474
00:25:16,830 --> 00:25:18,670
today, and to all of you for listening.
475
00:25:19,140 --> 00:25:21,919
I hope you’ll join us for the next episode of AMSEcast.
476
00:25:24,530 --> 00:25:27,509
If you’ve enjoyed this podcast, I would like to ask that you consider
477
00:25:27,509 --> 00:25:32,090
becoming a member of the 117 Society, the newest membership opportunity
478
00:25:32,140 --> 00:25:35,600
offered by the American Museum of Science and Energy Foundation.
479
00:25:36,360 --> 00:25:39,550
By joining the 117 Society, you will help us continue
480
00:25:39,550 --> 00:25:42,349
this podcast and our other innovative programming.
481
00:25:42,740 --> 00:25:45,649
You will support the expansion of our vitally important educational
482
00:25:45,650 --> 00:25:49,530
outreach, including virtual classes, and you will help ensure that both
483
00:25:49,540 --> 00:25:54,170
the American Museum of Science and Energy and the K-25 History Center can
484
00:25:54,170 --> 00:25:58,240
continue to provide world-class exhibits to our community and to the world.
485
00:25:59,080 --> 00:26:01,949
Benefits of membership includes special access to video
486
00:26:01,950 --> 00:26:06,160
and audio content, and 117 Society merchandise, as well
487
00:26:06,160 --> 00:26:09,100
as all the benefits of our Atom Splitter Membership Level.
488
00:26:09,690 --> 00:26:11,969
To learn more, go to AMSE.org.
489
00:26:13,070 --> 00:26:17,850
The 117 Society is vital to the future of AMSE and the K-25 History Center.
490
00:26:18,250 --> 00:26:20,850
I hope you will consider joining, and thank you very much.
00:00:04,040 --> 00:00:07,840
Welcome to AMSEcast, coming to you from Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
2
00:00:08,179 --> 00:00:11,500
a global leader in science, technology, and innovation.
3
00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:15,309
My name is Alan Lowe, director of the American Museum
4
00:00:15,339 --> 00:00:18,740
of Science and Energy, and the K-25 History Center.
5
00:00:19,690 --> 00:00:23,080
Each episode of AMSEcast presents world-renowned authors,
6
00:00:23,530 --> 00:00:27,490
scientists, historians, policymakers, and everyone in between,
7
00:00:27,929 --> 00:00:31,160
sharing their insights on a variety of fascinating topics.
8
00:00:36,760 --> 00:00:39,280
Welcome to a special edition of AMSEcast as
9
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:42,360
we celebrate 250 years of American innovation.
10
00:00:42,540 --> 00:00:46,480
With much appreciated support from the Institute of Museum and Library Services,
11
00:00:46,480 --> 00:00:51,879
or IMLS, we’re undertaking a series of AMSEcast interviews focusing on American
12
00:00:51,880 --> 00:00:56,720
innovations as part of our commemoration of the nation’s semi-quincentennial.
13
00:00:57,070 --> 00:00:59,150
On this episode, I’m honored to be joined in
14
00:00:59,150 --> 00:01:02,460
person in Washington, D.C. By Dr. Sudip Parikh.
15
00:01:02,650 --> 00:01:06,170
With undergraduate studies in journalism, and then in materials science at
16
00:01:06,170 --> 00:01:10,559
University of North Carolina, and his PhD in macromolecular structure and
17
00:01:10,559 --> 00:01:15,530
chemistry at the Scripps Research Institute, Sudip has an amazing career
18
00:01:15,730 --> 00:01:19,010
that’s included service as science advisor to the Senate Appropriations
19
00:01:19,010 --> 00:01:23,189
Committee, as vice president at Battelle, senior vice president and managing
20
00:01:23,190 --> 00:01:28,949
director at DIA global, and today as the 19th chief executive officer of the
21
00:01:28,949 --> 00:01:33,850
American Association for the Advancement of Science, or AAAS, and executive
22
00:01:33,850 --> 00:01:38,330
publisher of the Science family of journals, a post who began in January 2020.
23
00:01:38,910 --> 00:01:40,960
Sudip, thanks so much for joining us on the AMSEcast.
24
00:01:41,099 --> 00:01:41,990
Thanks so much for having me.
25
00:01:41,990 --> 00:01:42,860
I’m honored to be here.
26
00:01:42,929 --> 00:01:44,160
It’s a real, real pleasure.
27
00:01:44,770 --> 00:01:49,280
You’ve had such an amazing career that’s touched on so many points of science
28
00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:53,370
and engineering, I kind of thought we would look at our key theme of innovation
29
00:01:53,370 --> 00:01:56,800
by approaching it in three big buckets, if that’s all right with [laugh] you.
30
00:01:57,139 --> 00:02:01,940
So, kind of, dissemination of information, advocacy, and product development.
31
00:02:01,950 --> 00:02:04,789
So, I know you were an expert in developing
32
00:02:04,789 --> 00:02:08,100
a host of healthcare products and therapies.
33
00:02:08,180 --> 00:02:11,450
When you were in that business, what did you find were the primary
34
00:02:11,460 --> 00:02:15,229
instigators of innovation, and what were the primary obstacles to innovation?
35
00:02:15,469 --> 00:02:16,410
That’s a great question.
36
00:02:16,730 --> 00:02:20,150
The instigators were really when disciplines got together.
37
00:02:20,200 --> 00:02:22,780
That’s where it got exciting, particularly at a place like Battelle.
38
00:02:23,079 --> 00:02:26,850
When you can bring together molecular biologists and engineers,
39
00:02:27,000 --> 00:02:30,750
and you can build a device to deliver a medicine, it’s exciting.
40
00:02:30,770 --> 00:02:33,390
And it’s exciting for the basic part of it,
41
00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:34,929
which is, I just love great engineering.
42
00:02:34,940 --> 00:02:38,329
You know, seeing a little gadget that can make something happen in a perfectly
43
00:02:38,330 --> 00:02:42,830
precise way every time, no matter who does it, is a feat of engineering.
44
00:02:43,030 --> 00:02:46,579
And then there’s the audacity of thinking that we can work with
45
00:02:46,590 --> 00:02:51,900
molecules, at the molecular level, in living things and fix things.
46
00:02:51,950 --> 00:02:54,509
There’s an audacity to that that’s incredible.
47
00:02:54,509 --> 00:02:56,220
And so, you put those things together, and
48
00:02:56,220 --> 00:02:58,660
you realize the power that is in our hands.
49
00:02:58,660 --> 00:03:00,119
And then you think, my gosh, what if we brought
50
00:03:00,119 --> 00:03:01,799
together four or five of those disciplines?
51
00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:06,260
What if, in the mix, you add computational power, AI now?
52
00:03:06,260 --> 00:03:08,330
You know, there’s just so much that comes together
53
00:03:08,330 --> 00:03:09,630
when you bring these disciplines together.
54
00:03:09,630 --> 00:03:10,730
So, that’s the instigators.
55
00:03:11,160 --> 00:03:13,179
Things to hold you back: silos.
56
00:03:13,210 --> 00:03:16,329
You know, in every organization, no matter how wonderful they
57
00:03:16,329 --> 00:03:19,200
are, you have silos that build between these disciplines.
58
00:03:19,530 --> 00:03:23,100
Some of those silos are real in terms of walls and buildings, and some of them
59
00:03:23,290 --> 00:03:26,930
are in our minds, which is the jargon that we have to create for precision.
60
00:03:27,400 --> 00:03:31,660
And so, how do we lower those real barriers and those virtual barriers?
61
00:03:31,969 --> 00:03:34,530
And at a place like Battelle, one of the things we did for the physical
62
00:03:34,530 --> 00:03:36,520
barriers was just to say, hey, we’re all going to be in a room.
63
00:03:36,520 --> 00:03:39,250
We’d have big rooms that you could set up in any way
64
00:03:39,250 --> 00:03:42,110
you wanted, and the teams would all be based there.
65
00:03:42,160 --> 00:03:44,359
You bring the molecular biologists and engineers into the same
66
00:03:44,360 --> 00:03:47,940
room, so you could break down the concrete walls that way.
67
00:03:48,259 --> 00:03:49,719
The mental barriers are harder.
68
00:03:50,099 --> 00:03:52,649
They require actually spending time together and getting to know one
69
00:03:52,650 --> 00:03:55,829
another, and talking over a table, maybe while you’re having lunch,
70
00:03:56,100 --> 00:03:59,720
and seeing, oh, now I see what that three letter acronym means.
71
00:03:59,720 --> 00:04:01,370
It actually is something relatively simple.
72
00:04:01,620 --> 00:04:02,960
I just needed to understand that.
73
00:04:02,960 --> 00:04:05,260
And that can happen over time, and I think we’ve got
74
00:04:05,260 --> 00:04:06,890
to do more of it if we’re going to get more innovation.
75
00:04:07,160 --> 00:04:09,709
I think in this day and age, too, not to sound like the old
76
00:04:09,740 --> 00:04:12,950
guy here, but as we do social media, and emails, and that
77
00:04:12,950 --> 00:04:15,540
type of thing, in terms of our communications, that back
78
00:04:15,540 --> 00:04:18,680
and forth over the lunch table, I think, is getting less.
79
00:04:18,880 --> 00:04:20,679
So, how do we keep those silos, if we break them
80
00:04:20,679 --> 00:04:22,940
down, how we keep them broken down is a challenge.
81
00:04:23,270 --> 00:04:26,050
There’s so many things that I can—you know, we sort of look down
82
00:04:26,050 --> 00:04:29,530
on social media sometimes, but, you know, it’s a great start.
83
00:04:29,740 --> 00:04:30,569
It’s a great start.
84
00:04:30,570 --> 00:04:31,770
It’s a great exposure.
85
00:04:31,900 --> 00:04:34,930
In the right spaces, social media is a wonderful place for a
86
00:04:34,930 --> 00:04:38,219
biologist to interact with an ecologist to interact with a physicist.
87
00:04:38,720 --> 00:04:40,070
But then there’s going to be a next step.
88
00:04:40,230 --> 00:04:42,979
And that next step really requires some real time
89
00:04:42,980 --> 00:04:45,090
together, where you can get to know one another.
90
00:04:45,360 --> 00:04:47,960
And there’s also that bond of trust that you create when you do that.
91
00:04:47,990 --> 00:04:51,180
When you create that bond of trust, then it’s fun to have an intellectual
92
00:04:51,270 --> 00:04:56,660
exploration of what’s possible, and it’s hard to do that over 180 characters.
93
00:04:57,000 --> 00:04:57,450
And you’re right.
94
00:04:57,450 --> 00:04:59,260
I’ve seen this in just about every field.
95
00:04:59,790 --> 00:05:03,530
Before I ran science museums, as I told you, I ran presidential museums, and
96
00:05:03,770 --> 00:05:07,750
great staff members, but silos would develop just almost naturally over time.
97
00:05:07,890 --> 00:05:10,180
So, how you are aware of that, how you break
98
00:05:10,180 --> 00:05:12,539
those down and keep them down is important.
99
00:05:12,550 --> 00:05:14,860
So, I want to get to AAAS.
100
00:05:15,809 --> 00:05:19,780
Can you tell us a bit about what AAAS is, when it was created, and what it does?
101
00:05:19,960 --> 00:05:22,340
The AAAS, the American Association for the Advancement
102
00:05:22,340 --> 00:05:26,650
of Science, was created in 1848, 176 years ago.
103
00:05:26,990 --> 00:05:29,740
It was founded by a group of scientists in the United States who
104
00:05:29,740 --> 00:05:32,560
wanted to get together and talk about science, and they modeled
105
00:05:32,560 --> 00:05:35,349
it after the British Association for the Advancement of Science.
106
00:05:35,469 --> 00:05:38,510
87 of them got together in Philadelphia—they were all guys because
107
00:05:38,520 --> 00:05:42,905
it was 1848—remember, this pre-Civil War, right, so anytime you
108
00:05:42,930 --> 00:05:46,000
have an organization that’s 176 years old, they are of their time.
109
00:05:46,410 --> 00:05:50,039
Now, the thing I like to talk about with AAAS is that over that 176
110
00:05:50,050 --> 00:05:55,340
years, it has both had evolution and revolution so that it is still
111
00:05:55,340 --> 00:06:00,650
relevant, and I would say, boldly at the front of innovation, and also
112
00:06:01,020 --> 00:06:05,410
in creating a scientific enterprise that looks like America and that
113
00:06:05,410 --> 00:06:08,560
takes advantage of the creativity that comes from a diversity of thought.
114
00:06:08,630 --> 00:06:10,630
And so, that’s happened through evolution and revolution.
115
00:06:11,010 --> 00:06:14,740
I know, talking about the evolution of creativity in America
116
00:06:14,740 --> 00:06:18,909
and what makes America unique in that way—in many ways, I
117
00:06:18,910 --> 00:06:22,840
think—what do you think the role of immigration has been of
118
00:06:22,870 --> 00:06:27,039
getting in new ideas from around the world into this nation?
119
00:06:27,360 --> 00:06:30,009
The United States has such an amazing story.
120
00:06:30,050 --> 00:06:32,680
I love everything about the story of
121
00:06:32,719 --> 00:06:35,809
immigration, and the beacon that this country is.
122
00:06:35,889 --> 00:06:40,900
It has drawn folks for, you know, two centuries, over two centuries, and
123
00:06:40,920 --> 00:06:44,600
when you look at the innovations that have happened in the country, they
124
00:06:44,600 --> 00:06:49,250
are a mix of both people that are here and people that have immigrated here.
125
00:06:49,420 --> 00:06:54,680
They are a mix of hard work and sweat that must happen after an idea.
126
00:06:54,880 --> 00:06:56,390
That doesn’t happen just because you have an I—there’s
127
00:06:57,000 --> 00:06:58,890
a bazillion ideas out there; most of them never amount
128
00:06:58,900 --> 00:07:00,930
to anything because people don’t follow through.
129
00:07:01,460 --> 00:07:02,960
This is a place where you can do that.
130
00:07:03,179 --> 00:07:06,209
It’s a place where it’s encouraged, and it’s a place that, over the
131
00:07:06,210 --> 00:07:10,210
past 80 years, we’ve also said we’re going to support science and
132
00:07:10,230 --> 00:07:12,680
the scientific enterprise, and we’re going to support technology.
133
00:07:13,010 --> 00:07:17,330
And when you put that mix together—Ronald Reagan had a great quote at his very
134
00:07:17,330 --> 00:07:20,629
last speech where he says, you know, “There’s one thing to celebrate about
135
00:07:20,630 --> 00:07:24,070
America is this, which is that, you know, when you move to another country,
136
00:07:24,270 --> 00:07:27,050
you can be a person in that country, and you can even participate in it, but
137
00:07:27,050 --> 00:07:30,149
when you move to America, no matter where you are from in the world, you can be
138
00:07:30,150 --> 00:07:34,090
an American.” And that’s why you end up with an organization that’s 176 years
139
00:07:34,090 --> 00:07:39,729
old and has a CEO named Sudip Parikh, and has a board that is majority women.
140
00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:43,580
And it’s still Nobel Prize winners, it’s still National Academy
141
00:07:43,580 --> 00:07:47,259
members, it’s still leaders in scientific fields, but it changes
142
00:07:47,260 --> 00:07:51,159
over time because this country has this great aspiration, and that
143
00:07:51,690 --> 00:07:57,030
aspiration is powerful, it’s inspiring, and it’s never quite reached.
144
00:07:57,500 --> 00:08:00,740
It’s always asymptotic, right, if I’m talking to scientists.
145
00:08:01,020 --> 00:08:03,420
We’re never going to reach perfection, but we’re always going
146
00:08:03,420 --> 00:08:05,319
to be working harder to make it just a little bit better.
147
00:08:05,580 --> 00:08:07,110
And sometimes we have setbacks.
148
00:08:07,440 --> 00:08:11,420
Immigration is a key part of that story, and it’s a part of the story that I
149
00:08:11,420 --> 00:08:16,200
hope we never change because it is, you know, when you’re calling on 7 billion
150
00:08:16,200 --> 00:08:19,719
people from around the world for creative talent, it’s amazing what’s possible.
151
00:08:20,120 --> 00:08:21,450
You had service on Capitol Hill.
152
00:08:21,450 --> 00:08:24,140
We’re sitting here in Washington, D.C. Today, and we talk
153
00:08:24,150 --> 00:08:28,690
about America, this being our wonderful nation’s capital.
154
00:08:28,930 --> 00:08:30,620
When you worked here, what did you find were the key
155
00:08:30,620 --> 00:08:34,070
elements when you were working with members of Congress?
156
00:08:34,389 --> 00:08:36,809
How did you garner support for innovation?
157
00:08:37,530 --> 00:08:41,630
Because innovation, by definition, can be risky, unknown.
158
00:08:42,039 --> 00:08:44,510
How did that work with folks who most likely
159
00:08:44,510 --> 00:08:46,320
were not coming from a scientific background?
160
00:08:46,830 --> 00:08:49,870
Yeah, you know, most of our politicians are lawyers or
161
00:08:49,890 --> 00:08:53,589
business people by background, and what I found, though, is
162
00:08:53,610 --> 00:08:58,449
that in Congress, most if not all, would tell you they support
163
00:08:58,570 --> 00:09:01,089
research and development, they support science and technology.
164
00:09:01,520 --> 00:09:04,180
But then there were champions, and that was really critical.
165
00:09:04,190 --> 00:09:07,290
There are some folks who would make this their number one issue to
166
00:09:07,290 --> 00:09:10,760
say, I want to see more funding go into research and development.
167
00:09:10,910 --> 00:09:13,579
I want to see investment in basic research.
168
00:09:13,980 --> 00:09:15,960
And that’s where the conversation had to happen, which
169
00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:18,630
is, how do you have a conversation about basic research?
170
00:09:18,660 --> 00:09:21,520
How do you do that in a way that makes sense to folks?
171
00:09:21,960 --> 00:09:24,220
And what I found is that, as scientists and engineers,
172
00:09:24,220 --> 00:09:27,640
we’re taught to be both precise and accurate, right?
173
00:09:27,660 --> 00:09:30,819
It’s that whole thing about a target, and if you’re precise, the three
174
00:09:30,820 --> 00:09:33,509
arrows end up right on top of each other, and if you’re accurate,
175
00:09:33,530 --> 00:09:35,960
they also end up in the middle of the target, in the bull’s eye.
176
00:09:36,039 --> 00:09:37,320
And we’re taught to be both.
177
00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:39,440
We want all three arrows in the center of that target.
178
00:09:40,070 --> 00:09:42,680
But to have precision requires having jargon.
179
00:09:43,030 --> 00:09:47,390
It requires being able to talk about things in very specific ways, and when
180
00:09:47,390 --> 00:09:51,829
you do that, you are unintentionally creating a barrier to communication.
181
00:09:52,500 --> 00:09:55,699
And so, you have to realize that when you’re talking in terms of policy
182
00:09:55,700 --> 00:09:59,130
or you’re talking to politicians, you have to modulate, do I need
183
00:09:59,130 --> 00:10:02,250
to be precise in this conversation, do I need to be accurate in this
184
00:10:02,250 --> 00:10:05,679
conversation, and how much can I modulate it so I can get the point across?
185
00:10:06,090 --> 00:10:09,400
And so, you know, examples of that are, if you’re talking about an
186
00:10:09,400 --> 00:10:13,310
experiment in biology and you want to use the name of a molecule, my gosh,
187
00:10:13,310 --> 00:10:16,420
those names, you know, as a structural biologist, I get confused by them.
188
00:10:16,580 --> 00:10:20,780
And so, you have to take that and say, is that important to this conversation?
189
00:10:21,150 --> 00:10:22,480
And one of the things that came out while I was
190
00:10:22,480 --> 00:10:24,489
in Congress was the structure of the ribosome.
191
00:10:24,910 --> 00:10:29,250
Now, the ribosome is a beautiful molecule that is really critical to life.
192
00:10:29,619 --> 00:10:30,870
Life doesn’t exist without it.
193
00:10:31,130 --> 00:10:34,829
And the beautiful thing that was learned at that time was that
194
00:10:34,840 --> 00:10:38,940
the protein is gigantic, but actually the thing that does the
195
00:10:38,940 --> 00:10:44,360
catalysis, where the critical reaction happens, is done by RNA.
196
00:10:44,430 --> 00:10:47,709
And there’s something profound about that.
197
00:10:47,760 --> 00:10:52,550
What it tells us is that reaction critical to life began with RNA,
198
00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:57,699
not protein, and what that means is that there’s implications for
199
00:10:58,270 --> 00:11:01,440
the development of life overall, there’s implications for medicine.
200
00:11:01,870 --> 00:11:04,409
And so, I took this to one of the senators, and I said, “Gosh, Senator, look
201
00:11:04,410 --> 00:11:07,050
at this. This is the structure of the ribosome. Look what it’s telling us.
202
00:11:07,100 --> 00:11:09,900
It has all these implications about life.” And the senator
203
00:11:09,900 --> 00:11:11,400
looked at me and said, “Sudip, that’s a great thing.
204
00:11:11,400 --> 00:11:14,990
It’s a great argument for an agency that’s a few billion dollars, but
205
00:11:14,990 --> 00:11:19,130
the National Institutes of Health is a, at that time, $24 billion agency.
206
00:11:19,270 --> 00:11:19,990
Tell me something else.
207
00:11:20,020 --> 00:11:20,780
Tell me something more.”
208
00:11:21,230 --> 00:11:23,799
And you know, you can say that, well, gosh, the ribosome is different in
209
00:11:23,799 --> 00:11:27,600
different species and in different—germs versus humans—and I said germs, right?
210
00:11:27,600 --> 00:11:29,970
You don’t say [unintelligible] . You say germs—and suddenly you
211
00:11:29,970 --> 00:11:34,010
realize, ah, it can be the basis for therapies and treatments.
212
00:11:34,270 --> 00:11:36,330
And suddenly it becomes valuable for a $24
213
00:11:36,570 --> 00:11:38,589
billion agency, not a $7 billion agency.
214
00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:41,510
You have to be able to have those kinds of conversations, be able to
215
00:11:41,510 --> 00:11:45,260
modulate precision and accuracy for what you’re trying to accomplish.
216
00:11:45,790 --> 00:11:48,290
Always curious, those champions you talk about on Capitol Hill.
217
00:11:48,300 --> 00:11:50,180
What differentiates them?
218
00:11:50,190 --> 00:11:51,580
Why do they become champions?
219
00:11:51,580 --> 00:11:54,789
Is it a matter of personal interest, constituencies,
220
00:11:54,790 --> 00:11:56,970
that type of thing, or is it something else?
221
00:11:57,339 --> 00:12:00,269
You know, it can be a unique story every time.
222
00:12:00,279 --> 00:12:02,170
Sometimes it is the fact that they happen to
223
00:12:02,170 --> 00:12:05,510
represent a district that has a large facility in it.
224
00:12:05,590 --> 00:12:08,829
You know, usually the person who represents Oak Ridge is a champion
225
00:12:08,830 --> 00:12:11,910
for the Department of Energy, almost always, Democrat or Republican.
226
00:12:12,210 --> 00:12:13,279
So, that’s one way.
227
00:12:13,520 --> 00:12:15,760
The other is that they have a story.
228
00:12:15,990 --> 00:12:18,700
For example, in support of biomedical research, they might have a story
229
00:12:18,700 --> 00:12:21,689
in their family where biomedical research has made a difference, and that
230
00:12:21,690 --> 00:12:25,870
becomes a powerful source of their entry into support for the sciences.
231
00:12:26,059 --> 00:12:28,530
And then in other cases, it is just that they happened to
232
00:12:28,530 --> 00:12:31,219
be put on a committee that they didn’t even realize what it
233
00:12:31,219 --> 00:12:34,130
was, and they learned about it, and they became intrigued.
234
00:12:34,199 --> 00:12:35,330
And we see that all the time.
235
00:12:35,330 --> 00:12:37,490
You know, the current ranking member on the House Science
236
00:12:37,490 --> 00:12:40,720
Committee is Frank Lucas, a wonderful member of Congress.
237
00:12:40,740 --> 00:12:44,120
He will tell you, you know, he’s a farmer, and he’s also one of
238
00:12:44,120 --> 00:12:46,859
the best champions of science that we have in Congress because
239
00:12:46,860 --> 00:12:50,510
he recognizes the value of science and technology to the country.
240
00:12:50,719 --> 00:12:53,270
As a former farm boy, I can tell you, I’m proud of that.
241
00:12:53,279 --> 00:12:57,760
That’s great [laugh] . So, from your experience again on Capitol Hill, if you
242
00:12:57,780 --> 00:13:01,900
look back at our history, are there any specific policies you see that came
243
00:13:01,900 --> 00:13:06,399
out of Washington, you say were really important to helping spur innovation?
244
00:13:06,740 --> 00:13:10,149
Those of us in science policy, we all point back to 1945 and we
245
00:13:10,150 --> 00:13:13,370
point back to Vannevar Bush who was working for Roosevelt, and
246
00:13:13,370 --> 00:13:16,579
in 1945 he basically wrote himself a letter with some questions,
247
00:13:16,580 --> 00:13:20,090
and had Roosevelt sign it, and then he answered those questions,
248
00:13:20,150 --> 00:13:22,640
and that turned into something called the Endless Frontier.
249
00:13:22,700 --> 00:13:27,000
And it basically describes the model that we’ve built upon ever since then,
250
00:13:27,009 --> 00:13:31,610
which is this idea that the government ought to fund basic research, that basic
251
00:13:31,610 --> 00:13:35,635
research ought to be carried out, for the most part in academia, and that at
252
00:13:35,640 --> 00:13:39,710
the same time, would be training a future workforce, and that as discovery
253
00:13:39,710 --> 00:13:43,120
happened, the industry and the private sector would take it from there and turn
254
00:13:43,120 --> 00:13:46,930
it into products for consumers, and for the nation, and for national security.
255
00:13:47,100 --> 00:13:51,720
Now, that’s a beautiful idea in 1945, and we often give it too much credit.
256
00:13:52,110 --> 00:13:54,959
And one of the things that I say is that Vannevar Bush
257
00:13:55,230 --> 00:13:57,600
would be blown away if he saw the enterprise that we have
258
00:13:57,600 --> 00:14:00,089
today because it looks nothing like what he described.
259
00:14:00,099 --> 00:14:04,520
In fact, we have built organically on top of it, a much more beautiful,
260
00:14:04,539 --> 00:14:07,750
much more powerful, much more profound scientific enterprise.
261
00:14:08,150 --> 00:14:11,500
That enterprise has federal investment as heat and light,
262
00:14:11,730 --> 00:14:15,589
about $200 billion a year of federal investment, but then it
263
00:14:15,599 --> 00:14:20,099
has private sector investment of around $700 billion a year.
264
00:14:20,290 --> 00:14:21,870
Now, Buch never imagined that.
265
00:14:21,880 --> 00:14:23,520
He never imagined there’d be $700 billion
266
00:14:23,520 --> 00:14:26,209
worth of investment by the private sector.
267
00:14:26,480 --> 00:14:28,810
And philanthropy: billions of dollars of
268
00:14:28,810 --> 00:14:31,220
investment by philanthropy, he never imagined that.
269
00:14:31,530 --> 00:14:34,140
That higher education would take on roles related
270
00:14:34,140 --> 00:14:36,430
to product development, he never imagined that.
271
00:14:36,859 --> 00:14:40,460
And so, one of the things that I’ve become really an advocate for is
272
00:14:40,460 --> 00:14:44,710
to say, yes, we should give proper credit to that time in 1945, and the
273
00:14:44,710 --> 00:14:48,340
policies that were created then, but we also have to recognize what the
274
00:14:48,340 --> 00:14:52,910
enterprise looks like today, so that we can make the right kinds of policy
275
00:14:53,120 --> 00:14:56,730
prescriptions and recommendations that are needed to get us to the future.
276
00:14:56,990 --> 00:15:00,059
What got us to today, all those wonderful policy prescriptions
277
00:15:00,059 --> 00:15:03,200
that got us to today are not going to help us win the future.
278
00:15:03,460 --> 00:15:04,750
They’re not going to get us to where we need
279
00:15:04,750 --> 00:15:06,949
to be, and so we’ve got to recognize that.
280
00:15:06,950 --> 00:15:11,720
And so, when I think of what is a great policy prescription, one is just money.
281
00:15:12,840 --> 00:15:17,069
This country has been an incredible supporter of science and
282
00:15:17,070 --> 00:15:19,890
technology, like the world has never seen before, and what
283
00:15:19,890 --> 00:15:22,510
that’s meant is other countries are now following us, right?
284
00:15:22,530 --> 00:15:25,300
They’ve seen the power that comes from that because they
285
00:15:25,300 --> 00:15:27,610
recognize that economic growth, normally—when you’re
286
00:15:27,610 --> 00:15:29,860
an economist, you say it comes from a couple things.
287
00:15:30,080 --> 00:15:32,459
One is it comes from the growth of population.
288
00:15:32,630 --> 00:15:33,800
It comes from demographics.
289
00:15:33,980 --> 00:15:36,169
You get incremental growth because you added another person.
290
00:15:36,680 --> 00:15:40,740
The other way is a rise in productivity, which is that, hey, those people
291
00:15:40,760 --> 00:15:43,890
can do more stuff and make more stuff, and that increases your economy.
292
00:15:44,429 --> 00:15:47,220
But there’s another thing, and that is science and technology.
293
00:15:47,230 --> 00:15:48,390
It’s a wild card.
294
00:15:48,450 --> 00:15:52,610
It can lead to step function changes in economic growth.
295
00:15:52,910 --> 00:15:55,780
And if you can get step function changes in economic growth, you can
296
00:15:55,780 --> 00:15:59,150
build a society that goes to the Moon, that goes to Mars, that cures
297
00:15:59,150 --> 00:16:03,030
disease, that feeds eight billion people, you can do that when you
298
00:16:03,030 --> 00:16:06,339
have that kind of disruption, which is what the country invented.
299
00:16:06,580 --> 00:16:10,400
Our good friend, Guru Madhavan, who helped connect us here today,
300
00:16:10,500 --> 00:16:14,620
has spoken pretty eloquently to me in the past on AMSEcast about
301
00:16:14,840 --> 00:16:19,250
striking a balance between innovation and maintaining current
302
00:16:19,300 --> 00:16:22,760
systems and infrastructure, and how we do that moving forward.
303
00:16:22,760 --> 00:16:25,919
So, how do you see us striking that balance of having those disruptive
304
00:16:25,920 --> 00:16:30,650
innovations but also maintaining our infrastructure and systems that we have?
305
00:16:31,059 --> 00:16:32,859
It’s a really critical question.
306
00:16:32,980 --> 00:16:36,730
In 1945, if you’d asked somebody in policy, they would say,
307
00:16:36,730 --> 00:16:38,530
“Well, gosh, the federal government is in charge of the
308
00:16:38,530 --> 00:16:41,620
infrastructure.” Oak Ridge, Lawrence Livermore, Los Alamos,
309
00:16:42,080 --> 00:16:44,440
these are the places where big infrastructure is going to be.
310
00:16:44,759 --> 00:16:48,229
Big telescopes at Arecibo and elsewhere are going to be government funded.
311
00:16:48,670 --> 00:16:51,180
When you look at it from the point of view of 2024, we have to
312
00:16:51,180 --> 00:16:54,630
realize that infrastructure, now because of the fact that the private
313
00:16:54,630 --> 00:16:57,870
sector is also investing, some of that infrastructure that is the
314
00:16:57,880 --> 00:17:01,230
backbone of our technology, whether it’s the internet, artificial
315
00:17:01,230 --> 00:17:05,690
intelligence, or even in biology, is coming from the private sector.
316
00:17:06,039 --> 00:17:10,430
We have to be recognizing that there has to be a level of coordination
317
00:17:10,530 --> 00:17:13,810
and situational awareness between the federal government, and
318
00:17:13,819 --> 00:17:17,520
industry, and philanthropy that has never been seen before.
319
00:17:17,889 --> 00:17:20,469
Because we have to know what is the linchpin of
320
00:17:20,480 --> 00:17:23,079
this particular area of science and technology?
321
00:17:23,240 --> 00:17:25,180
We have to understand well, who’s supporting that?
322
00:17:25,520 --> 00:17:29,440
Who is making sure that if we are wanting to make our
323
00:17:29,440 --> 00:17:33,109
grid dependent upon lithium, where are we getting that?
324
00:17:33,139 --> 00:17:34,770
Is somebody taking care of the supply chain?
325
00:17:34,790 --> 00:17:35,790
Who is looking at all that?
326
00:17:36,059 --> 00:17:39,199
And in the past, we allowed that to happen organically, but we
327
00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:41,280
can’t do that anymore, and that’s part of what I mean when I
328
00:17:41,280 --> 00:17:43,610
say that what got us to here isn’t going to get us to there.
329
00:17:43,890 --> 00:17:48,060
As the publisher of the Science family of journals, as we talk about these
330
00:17:48,060 --> 00:17:52,860
ideas for the future, what do you see as your role of disseminating those ideas,
331
00:17:53,250 --> 00:17:57,769
versus talking about, kind of, incremental changes to our current knowledge?
332
00:17:57,770 --> 00:18:00,580
So, in terms of bringing radical new ideas, if that’s
333
00:18:00,580 --> 00:18:04,129
the right word, to the table, versus incremental changes.
334
00:18:04,360 --> 00:18:06,860
What a privilege it is, first of all, just let me say this out loud,
335
00:18:06,860 --> 00:18:09,639
it’s a privilege for me to get to be the executive publisher of Science.
336
00:18:09,960 --> 00:18:12,189
The journal was started by Thomas Edison in 1880.
337
00:18:12,320 --> 00:18:15,170
He gave the first $10,000 for it, and then when he got bored
338
00:18:15,170 --> 00:18:18,350
of it, Alexander Graham Bell gave the second $10,000 for it.
339
00:18:18,790 --> 00:18:23,560
And so, it has this rich history going back to 1880, and it is the
340
00:18:23,560 --> 00:18:27,760
manifestation of that idea of multidisciplinary science, right?
341
00:18:27,809 --> 00:18:31,570
It has every kind of science in it, and the front matter is really about,
342
00:18:31,580 --> 00:18:36,150
how do you synthesize that for a physicist to be able to learn about biology?
343
00:18:36,230 --> 00:18:38,730
And when you can do that, and when you can say, okay, there’s going to
344
00:18:38,730 --> 00:18:42,170
be incremental work that happens—and that might be published in Science.
345
00:18:42,170 --> 00:18:45,090
It might not be, might be published somewhere else—but when there are these
346
00:18:45,090 --> 00:18:50,160
moments of inspiration that come because of basic discovery, CRISPR, you
347
00:18:50,160 --> 00:18:53,549
know the idea that you can edit genes, and you can do it in a way that
348
00:18:53,549 --> 00:18:56,490
takes advantage of the human genome project that, you know, that we spent
349
00:18:56,740 --> 00:19:00,940
billions of dollars on, that only comes about when you’ve got people talking
350
00:19:00,940 --> 00:19:04,989
to one another across disciplines, and that happens at a place like Science.
351
00:19:04,989 --> 00:19:08,949
It’s not the only place, but I would say that we are wedded to the
352
00:19:08,950 --> 00:19:12,560
idea that communication, that dissemination, is critically important.
353
00:19:13,010 --> 00:19:16,430
We’re not wedded to the idea that it’s always going to be a paper magazine.
354
00:19:16,590 --> 00:19:17,600
I appreciate that.
355
00:19:17,900 --> 00:19:20,780
What I’ve learned is that anybody who has a small pox
356
00:19:20,780 --> 00:19:23,479
inoculation, so who has the scar on their arm from that, so
357
00:19:23,480 --> 00:19:26,350
that means they’re over 50, they like reading a paper magazine.
358
00:19:26,350 --> 00:19:27,639
That’s where they see the synthesis.
359
00:19:28,029 --> 00:19:30,349
What we’ve also learned is those of us who don’t have that
360
00:19:30,350 --> 00:19:34,230
smallpox vaccination, because we eradicated smallpox, those
361
00:19:34,230 --> 00:19:37,640
folks, they like to see that synthesis in a different way.
362
00:19:37,720 --> 00:19:38,890
They’re going to want to see it online.
363
00:19:38,900 --> 00:19:40,409
They’re going to want to see it through newsletters.
364
00:19:40,410 --> 00:19:42,100
They’re going to want to see it through social media.
365
00:19:42,570 --> 00:19:46,109
And so, we are wedded to the idea that synthesis has to
366
00:19:46,119 --> 00:19:49,060
happen, and that multidisciplinary science is the way forward,
367
00:19:49,060 --> 00:19:51,110
and it’s the only way we’re going to solve big problems.
368
00:19:51,410 --> 00:19:54,889
And we’re also, we are energized by the idea that it’s going
369
00:19:54,890 --> 00:19:57,570
to change radically over the next ten years and twenty years.
370
00:19:57,840 --> 00:20:00,580
Because it’s one of those things that happens like a phase transition.
371
00:20:00,650 --> 00:20:02,960
Those of us who read the magazine, we read it, we read it, we
372
00:20:02,960 --> 00:20:04,909
read it, and then all of a sudden, [snaps finger] it changes.
373
00:20:04,910 --> 00:20:06,880
I just snapped my finger, for those of you on the podcast.
374
00:20:07,270 --> 00:20:10,360
You know, it changes like that: it happens, slow, slow, slow, then fast.
375
00:20:10,530 --> 00:20:13,540
And we want to be at the vanguard of that because we recognize that if we can
376
00:20:13,830 --> 00:20:18,300
be involved in dissemination, then we can be a catalyst for what comes next.
377
00:20:18,599 --> 00:20:21,330
Is there a thought as you make that transition,
378
00:20:21,330 --> 00:20:23,269
that any process will have to change?
379
00:20:23,459 --> 00:20:26,530
I know peer reviewed; is that part of your process?
380
00:20:26,530 --> 00:20:30,090
Will that support, or perhaps not support talking
381
00:20:30,090 --> 00:20:32,509
about innovation, new things in the journals?
382
00:20:32,700 --> 00:20:36,540
It requires rethinking what stages are dissemination important?
383
00:20:36,540 --> 00:20:39,359
So, for example, pre-prints are before peer
384
00:20:39,360 --> 00:20:41,669
review, and they’re incredibly valuable.
385
00:20:41,930 --> 00:20:44,610
We are incredibly supportive of peer review, even though
386
00:20:44,610 --> 00:20:47,110
it happens before a paper ever gets to us at Science.
387
00:20:47,110 --> 00:20:50,850
And the reason we are is because we know that as people put their
388
00:20:50,850 --> 00:20:55,430
ideas up in a pre-print server, they can have a conversation online
389
00:20:55,630 --> 00:21:00,150
that is radically faster than what was imagined in the 1600s, right?
390
00:21:00,150 --> 00:21:02,660
In the 1600s, you’d write things down in a book, that book
391
00:21:02,660 --> 00:21:04,820
would get disseminated over the course of 20 years, and
392
00:21:04,820 --> 00:21:06,860
over the course of 20 years, you’d start to get feedback.
393
00:21:07,180 --> 00:21:09,560
We can take that down to 20 minutes because
394
00:21:09,560 --> 00:21:11,560
what can happen is you’re sharing that online.
395
00:21:11,820 --> 00:21:14,420
Now, that has to still be part of the story.
396
00:21:14,429 --> 00:21:15,540
There’s another part of the story, which
397
00:21:15,540 --> 00:21:16,950
is, how do you get to a version of record?
398
00:21:16,959 --> 00:21:19,240
How do you get to a place where, all right, this is the
399
00:21:19,240 --> 00:21:21,780
finished product for that, so that we can then use that for
400
00:21:21,780 --> 00:21:24,950
citations and for the formal part of getting science done?
401
00:21:25,220 --> 00:21:29,300
But we have to be able to think in terms of two things at once, which is
402
00:21:29,300 --> 00:21:32,480
that there is a need for that process, but there’s also a need for this
403
00:21:32,490 --> 00:21:36,880
fast, dynamic, in-the-moment communication of science because that’s how
404
00:21:36,880 --> 00:21:39,379
we’re going to get to vaccines faster, when needed; that’s how we’re going
405
00:21:39,380 --> 00:21:41,730
to get to treatments faster, when needed; that’s also how we’re going to
406
00:21:41,730 --> 00:21:45,560
solve big problems like, if you’ve got to temporarily build a bridge over
407
00:21:45,560 --> 00:21:48,830
a river because a boat ran into your bridge, how are you going to do that?
408
00:21:48,830 --> 00:21:51,279
And how are you going to crowdsource ideas to make that happen in the
409
00:21:51,280 --> 00:21:55,640
fastest way, and in the most efficient way, and in the most affordable way?
410
00:21:56,070 --> 00:21:58,690
So, you’re really talking about how we maintain this edge
411
00:21:58,690 --> 00:22:02,690
and innovation we’ve had for 250 years, for the next 250.
412
00:22:02,809 --> 00:22:03,399
Amen.
413
00:22:03,440 --> 00:22:04,600
I’m all about that.
414
00:22:04,610 --> 00:22:05,400
How are we going to do that?
415
00:22:05,400 --> 00:22:08,290
Because if people are copying what we’ve already done—and
416
00:22:08,290 --> 00:22:10,941
that’s great, we were leading for that very reason—now is
417
00:22:10,941 --> 00:22:12,720
the time to say, how are we going to stay at the vanguard?
418
00:22:13,330 --> 00:22:13,879
That’s right.
419
00:22:14,080 --> 00:22:14,920
Ask that question.
420
00:22:15,200 --> 00:22:18,800
My last question for you is related to that: we do so
421
00:22:18,800 --> 00:22:22,979
much work with K through 12 students at AMSE and K-25.
422
00:22:23,300 --> 00:22:25,880
What do you think are the best ways to inspire that next generation
423
00:22:25,880 --> 00:22:29,220
of scientists, engineers, and innovators as we move forward?
424
00:22:30,010 --> 00:22:31,330
I think that there are several things.
425
00:22:31,340 --> 00:22:36,110
One is, when you see great stuff, there’s nothing like seeing great engineering.
426
00:22:36,150 --> 00:22:40,410
When you see a beautiful bridge, when you see a rocket, when you see
427
00:22:40,450 --> 00:22:45,120
a robotic mission to a far off planet, there is nothing like that.
428
00:22:45,230 --> 00:22:46,889
And that’s what inspired me.
429
00:22:46,979 --> 00:22:48,570
That’s what inspired many others, I think.
430
00:22:48,720 --> 00:22:53,760
The other is when you see that person who’s doing that work in your community.
431
00:22:54,310 --> 00:22:57,260
When you recognize that we can see the mountains of Pluto.
432
00:22:57,340 --> 00:23:00,530
I love the fact that we know that there are methane-covered mountains on Pluto.
433
00:23:00,660 --> 00:23:02,600
That blows me away that we know that.
434
00:23:03,059 --> 00:23:05,730
And when you recognize that the person who made that possible is
435
00:23:05,730 --> 00:23:08,709
living in your community, or who grew up in your community, that
436
00:23:08,710 --> 00:23:11,199
makes a world of difference, to recognize there’s a connection
437
00:23:11,200 --> 00:23:15,410
between that thing that seems like magic, and it’s actually not magic.
438
00:23:15,670 --> 00:23:18,300
It’s math, and it’s physics, and it’s engineering.
439
00:23:18,400 --> 00:23:20,360
We want to be able to see that in our communities.
440
00:23:20,360 --> 00:23:22,819
And so, if we can do those two things, which is first of all, to inspire
441
00:23:22,820 --> 00:23:26,270
with great works, and then the second is to show that it’s human.
442
00:23:26,420 --> 00:23:27,430
It is human.
443
00:23:27,800 --> 00:23:31,350
And that there are some folks like Einstein who are extraordinary,
444
00:23:31,920 --> 00:23:36,250
but so much of this happens from humans that are flawed, we
445
00:23:36,250 --> 00:23:39,770
make mistakes, and yet we are inspired to do something great.
446
00:23:39,809 --> 00:23:43,949
We are inspired to do something that pushes humanity farther.
447
00:23:44,510 --> 00:23:47,670
And when you see that, how would you not want to be involved in science?
448
00:23:47,890 --> 00:23:49,600
Now, there’s a whole bunch of practical things involved,
449
00:23:49,600 --> 00:23:52,360
which is, we got to make it a better job, better profession.
450
00:23:52,580 --> 00:23:55,296
If you want to be an engineer, we shouldn’t make it to where you’ve got to be
451
00:23:55,296 --> 00:24:00,180
able to afford tuition at a high price to get to your first job in engineering.
452
00:24:00,400 --> 00:24:03,550
If you want to be in molecular biology or in the sciences, you
453
00:24:03,550 --> 00:24:06,620
shouldn’t have to realize that you have to wait ten years or twenty
454
00:24:06,620 --> 00:24:10,770
years before you get to your first investigator-initiated grant.
455
00:24:10,870 --> 00:24:13,590
We have to fix the things that are involved in the professions that make it
456
00:24:13,590 --> 00:24:17,720
harder and make it tougher for folks to be creative and innovative and lead.
457
00:24:18,270 --> 00:24:20,780
But the inspiration, my gosh, it’s all around us.
458
00:24:20,990 --> 00:24:23,260
Well, certainly an inspiring conversation today.
459
00:24:23,270 --> 00:24:25,180
Thank you so much for joining us in AMSEcast.
460
00:24:25,180 --> 00:24:26,500
I really enjoyed our conversation.
461
00:24:26,580 --> 00:24:27,080
It was terrific.
462
00:24:27,080 --> 00:24:27,899
Thank you so much.
463
00:24:32,830 --> 00:24:35,230
Thank you for joining us on this episode of AMSEcast.
464
00:24:35,940 --> 00:24:40,260
For more information on this topic or any others, you can always visit us at
465
00:24:40,520 --> 00:24:46,899
AMSE.org or find, like, and follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.
466
00:24:47,400 --> 00:24:49,729
I invite you to visit the American Museum of Science
467
00:24:49,730 --> 00:24:52,530
and Energy and the K-25 History Center in person.
468
00:24:52,850 --> 00:24:57,020
You can also shop at our online store and become a member at AMSE.org.
469
00:24:57,480 --> 00:25:00,920
Thanks to our production team with Matt Mullins, plus our supportive colleagues
470
00:25:00,920 --> 00:25:04,760
at the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, Office of Environmental
471
00:25:04,760 --> 00:25:08,740
Management, and Office of Legacy Management, as well as Oak Ridge National
472
00:25:08,740 --> 00:25:14,600
Laboratory, the Y-12 National Security Complex, NNSA, and the AMSE Foundation.
473
00:25:15,090 --> 00:25:16,830
And of course, thanks to our wonderful guests
474
00:25:16,830 --> 00:25:18,670
today, and to all of you for listening.
475
00:25:19,140 --> 00:25:21,919
I hope you’ll join us for the next episode of AMSEcast.
476
00:25:24,530 --> 00:25:27,509
If you’ve enjoyed this podcast, I would like to ask that you consider
477
00:25:27,509 --> 00:25:32,090
becoming a member of the 117 Society, the newest membership opportunity
478
00:25:32,140 --> 00:25:35,600
offered by the American Museum of Science and Energy Foundation.
479
00:25:36,360 --> 00:25:39,550
By joining the 117 Society, you will help us continue
480
00:25:39,550 --> 00:25:42,349
this podcast and our other innovative programming.
481
00:25:42,740 --> 00:25:45,649
You will support the expansion of our vitally important educational
482
00:25:45,650 --> 00:25:49,530
outreach, including virtual classes, and you will help ensure that both
483
00:25:49,540 --> 00:25:54,170
the American Museum of Science and Energy and the K-25 History Center can
484
00:25:54,170 --> 00:25:58,240
continue to provide world-class exhibits to our community and to the world.
485
00:25:59,080 --> 00:26:01,949
Benefits of membership includes special access to video
486
00:26:01,950 --> 00:26:06,160
and audio content, and 117 Society merchandise, as well
487
00:26:06,160 --> 00:26:09,100
as all the benefits of our Atom Splitter Membership Level.
488
00:26:09,690 --> 00:26:11,969
To learn more, go to AMSE.org.
489
00:26:13,070 --> 00:26:17,850
The 117 Society is vital to the future of AMSE and the K-25 History Center.
490
00:26:18,250 --> 00:26:20,850
I hope you will consider joining, and thank you very much.