67: The Music of the Spheres: Kepler's Mystical Journey to Scientific Revolution

Welcome back to the I Take History With My Coffee podcast where we explore history in the time it takes to drink a cup of coffee.


Johannes Kepler, Astronomia Nova, 1609
“For, if I had believed that we could ignore these eight minutes, I would have patched up my hypothesis accordingly. But since it was not permissible to ignore them, those eight minutes point the road to a complete reformation of astronomy: they have become the building material for a large part of this work.”


In the waning days of the sixteenth century, as Europe stood poised between medieval tradition and scientific revolution, a profound astronomical partnership was forming that would forever alter humanity's understanding of the cosmos. The year was 1599, and the imperial court of Prague was about to become the stage for one of history's most consequential scientific collaborations. Johannes Kepler, a brilliant but impoverished German mathematician, would soon join forces with Tycho Brahe, the aristocratic Danish astronomer who possessed the most precise celestial observations to date. From this unlikely union would emerge a revolutionary new vision of planetary motion that discarded two millennia of astronomical dogma. 

In 1599, the eccentric Habsburg Emperor Rudolf II welcomed Tycho Brahe to Prague, providing him with Benatky Castle and a generous annual salary of 3,000 florins. Rudolf, more interested in science and art than politics, sought to transform Prague into a center of learning. Tycho's arrival represented a significant acquisition for the emperor's intellectual court. Having lost favor in his native Denmark following King Frederick II's death, Tycho had spent several years wandering through northern Europe with his family, assistants, and precious astronomical instruments before accepting Rudolf's patronage.

Tycho recognized his need for a capable mathematician to help analyze his decades of observations. He extended an invitation to Johannes Kepler, a promising mathematical talent whose published work had impressed him despite an awkward earlier correspondence. Kepler arrived in Prague on February 4, 1600, beginning what would become an extraordinarily productive yet personally tense collaboration.

The two astronomers could hardly have been more different. Tycho, born to Danish nobility, was accustomed to deference and authority. Described as having a "volcanic temper" yet also "warmhearted and extroverted," he had built his reputation on observational precision rather than mathematical theory. Kepler, by contrast, came from humble origins and was characterized as "shy, occasionally petulant, and introverted." Where Tycho was primarily an observer, Kepler excelled in theoretical mathematics. Their age difference—Tycho was 53, Kepler 29—created a natural power imbalance.

Religious differences added further tension. Tycho "had not received the sacrament for eighteen years," while Kepler was devout and had originally planned to enter the clergy. Their theoretical perspectives also diverged: Tycho advocated his own compromise, the “Tychonic system," while Kepler firmly supported the Copernican heliocentric model.

Upon Kepler's arrival, he was immediately and unwittingly drawn into a bitter scientific feud between Tycho and Nicolaus Reimers Baer, known as Ursus, “The Bear.” The controversy centered on a planetary system very similar to Tycho's own that Ursus had published in his 1588 "Foundation of Astronomy." Tycho suspected Ursus of plagiarizing his ideas after a visit to his observatory at Hven. The dispute had escalated into personal attacks, with Ursus ridiculing Tycho's prosthetic nose and slandering his common-law wife.

Inside Ursus's book was a letter from Kepler praising Ursus, which had been published without Kepler's permission. Tycho expressed shock that Kepler would praise "someone like Ursus" and required him to write a retraction. In the beginning, much of Kepler’s time was spent refuting Ursus's work in preparation for Tycho's legal battle. The dispute only ended when Ursus died before the trial could begin, finally freeing Kepler to focus on astronomical research.

Despite these tensions, Tycho assigned Kepler to study the orbit of Mars. However, their collaboration was short-lived. After a sumptuous banquet at Baron Rosenberg's house on October 13, 1601, Tycho developed a urinary infection after refusing to leave the table to relieve himself—a common matter of court etiquette. After eleven days of suffering, he died on October 24, 1601, at age 54.

In the aftermath, Kepler moved swiftly to secure his position, receiving an appointment as Imperial Mathematician to Rudolf II. More significantly, he gained access to Tycho's observations—though not without conflict with Tycho's heirs, particularly his son-in-law, Frans Tengnagel, who attempted to control the use of the data. Nonetheless, Kepler now possessed the empirical foundation that would enable his revolutionary insights into planetary motion.

To understand the significance of Kepler's inheritance of Tycho's data, we must examine the unique intellectual journey that prepared him for this moment.

 Born on December 27, 1571, in Weil der Stadt near Stuttgart, Germany, Kepler emerged from troubled circumstances. His father, Heinrich Kepler, was a mercenary soldier who was nearly hanged in 1577 and eventually abandoned the family permanently in 1589. His mother, Katherine, would later face witch trial accusations, reflecting the superstitious era into which Kepler was born.

Despite these difficulties, Kepler showed early interest in astronomy. At age six, he observed the comet of 1577 with his mother—the same comet Tycho Brahe was measuring with his instruments. At the age of thirteen, Kepler observed a lunar eclipse, noting its distinctive red color. These early experiences fostered his fascination with celestial phenomena.

The Lutheran education system provided Kepler with an escape from family instability. His academic talents earned him scholarships to attend the seminary at Adelberg and later Maulbronn before he entered the University of Tübingen in 1589. At Tübingen, he studied under Michael Maestlin, who introduced him to Copernican theory, although Maestlin publicly taught the traditional Ptolemaic system. Kepler embraced Copernicanism with a conviction that would guide his life's work.

His troubled family background profoundly shaped Kepler's psychological makeup. He described himself as having a "doglike nature" characterized by insecurity, a need for approval, and intellectual restlessness. His deep-seated psychological issues with authority figures—manifested in his alternating reverence for and rebellion against Tycho—echoed his earlier relationships with father figures. This pattern of conflicted relationships extended to his interactions with other mentors, such as Maestlin, and would influence his scientific collaborations throughout his life.

In 1594, before completing his theological studies, Kepler accepted a position teaching mathematics in Graz, Austria. There, on July 9, 1595, he experienced what he considered a divine revelation about the structure of the cosmos. While drawing a geometric figure during a lecture, he was struck by the idea that the orbits of the six known planets could be explained by the five perfect Platonic solids nested inside one another. These five solids—the tetrahedron (4 triangular faces), cube (6 square faces), octahedron (8 triangular faces), dodecahedron (12 pentagonal faces), and icosahedron (20 triangular faces)—your standard set of D&D dice - are the only regular polyhedra possible in three-dimensional space. Kepler proposed that these solids, nested within each other, determined the relative distances between planetary orbits. This insight formed the basis of his first book, "Mysterium Cosmographicum" (Cosmographical Mystery), published in 1596.

The Mysterium revealed Kepler's unique approach to astronomy, combining rigorous mathematics with Neoplatonic mysticism. He sought not just to describe planetary motions but to understand the divine mathematical harmonies he believed God had encoded in the cosmos. Though his perfect solids theory would ultimately prove incorrect, it demonstrated the blend of geometrical intuition and religious devotion that characterized his work.

In 1597, Kepler married Barbara Müller, a twice-widowed mill owner's daughter. Their marriage was arranged through intermediaries with primarily financial considerations in mind. That same year, religious persecution of Protestants in the Habsburg territories began to threaten Kepler's position in Graz. After a temporary exile and an increasingly precarious situation, Kepler recognized the need to seek new employment, which led to his correspondence with Tycho and, ultimately, to his journey to Prague in 1600.

Following Tycho's death, Kepler leveraged his position as Imperial Mathematician to access Tycho's complete observational records. With characteristic confidence, he initially boasted that he could solve the orbit of Mars in eight days. Instead, the task would consume nearly eight years of intense calculation, filling over 900 folio pages with computations.

Kepler's work on Mars proved revolutionary due to his willingness to let observational evidence supersede theoretical assumptions. The traditional axiom of astronomy, dating back to antiquity, had been that celestial bodies must move in perfect circles at uniform speeds—an assumption even Copernicus had maintained. When Kepler's circular models failed to match Tycho's observations of Mars by 8 arc-minutes (about 1/4 the width of a full moon), he made the crucial decision to trust the data rather than the theory.

As he famously declared, "those eight minutes point the road to a complete reformation of astronomy." Unlike previous astronomers who might have "cheated away or shrugged away" such discrepancies by adding more geometric constructs, Kepler's commitment to physical causality made it impossible to ignore even small errors.

Kepler's psychological traits significantly influenced his approach to science. His outsider status and personal insecurities freed him to challenge established dogma. Where conventional astronomers hesitated to abandon centuries of tradition, Kepler's complex psychological makeup gave him the freedom to pursue radical solutions. His self-described "magic dynamo" transformed disadvantages into creative energy.

Kepler completed the outline of his "Astronomia Nova" (New Astronomy) by 1605, but publication was delayed until 1609 due to funding issues and disputes with Tycho's heirs. It was in this work that Kepler stated his first two laws of planetary motion.

Ironically, he discovered his Second Law before his First. By 1602, he determined that planets sweep out equal areas in equal times as they orbit, moving faster when closer to the sun and slower when farther away. This insight emerged from his physical intuition that "there is a force in the sun" that moves the planets—remarkably anticipating the concept of gravity. Curiously, his derivation involved mathematical errors that "canceled out in the most precise manner, as if by miracle," yielding the correct result despite flawed reasoning.

The path to the First Law involved numerous false starts. After rejecting circular orbits, Kepler became fixated on an "egg-shaped" orbit for Mars. The breakthrough came when he noticed a recurring numerical value appearing in different calculation contexts, revealing that Mars' orbit was an ellipse with the sun at one focus. This discovery directly challenged the 2,000-year-old assumption of circular celestial motion.

 The significance extended beyond mathematics. By introducing physical causality into astronomy, he transformed the field from a purely geometrical exercise into a search for natural laws. He even came remarkably close to discovering gravity, correctly intuiting that if two stones were placed in space, "they would come together... each approaching the other in proportion to the other's mass."

Despite these insights, Kepler couldn't fully embrace the concept of gravity acting at a distance, which seemed too reminiscent of the mystical "anima mundi" that early modern science was rejecting. Even Newton would later struggle with the "absurdity" of action at a distance, underscoring the difficulty of this conceptual leap.

The reception to the work was largely negative. One of his foremost correspondents rejected elliptical orbits as "absurd" and suggested Kepler should "preserve the perfect circular orbit" by adding "another little epicycle." This resistance illustrates the power of established paradigms in scientific thought.

While working on Mars, Kepler also made significant contributions to the field of optics. In a 1604 publication, he explained vision, the camera obscura, and how spectacles functioned—partly inspired by his own visual problems.

In 1610, astronomical discourse was transformed by Galileo Galilei's telescopic discoveries, published in "Sidereus Nuncius" (Starry Messenger). Within a month of this publication, Kepler wrote "Conversation with the Starry Messenger," supporting Galileo's observations of Jupiter's moons and the moon's mountainous surface—despite not having confirmed them himself.

Kepler's generous endorsement of Galileo contrasted with the skepticism of many academics, who refused even to look through the telescope. When Kepler finally observed Jupiter's moons himself in August 1610, he lent his considerable authority to Galileo's claims. This support proved crucial in gaining acceptance for the field of telescopic astronomy.

The relationship between these men highlights their complementary approaches: Galileo excelled at observation and experimentation, while Kepler excelled at mathematical foundations and theory. Despite correspondence, they never met, and Galileo never fully accepted Kepler's elliptical orbits despite their elegance.

This period of productive work ended with political upheaval. Emperor Rudolf II, whose patronage had enabled Kepler's research, was forced to abdicate in 1611 and died in 1612. Kepler's position at court became untenable, leading to his relocation to Linz as district mathematician.

Kepler arrived in Linz in 1612, having experienced significant personal loss. His wife, Barbara, had died in 1611, a victim of an epidemic that swept through Prague. In 1613, after methodically evaluating eleven potential candidates, Kepler married Susanna Reuttinger, who would provide stability during his later years.

Despite his Lutheran faith, Kepler's unorthodox religious views—particularly his rejection of Christ's presence in communion—led to his partial excommunication from Lutheran services. Nevertheless, he continued developing his comprehensive explanation of the Copernican system while enduring the outbreak of the Thirty Years' War and defending his mother in a traumatic six-year witch trial. 

Amidst these troubles, Kepler experienced his next great breakthrough. On March 8, 1618, he discovered a mathematical relationship between a planet's orbital period and its distance from the sun but initially rejected it. On May 15, he rediscovered this relationship whereby he recognized its validity, noting that it "agreed so perfectly with the data" from Tycho's observations. This became his Third Law: the squares of the orbital periods of any two planets are proportional to the cubes of their mean distances from the sun.

Kepler published this discovery in "Harmonice Mundi" (Harmony of the World) in 1619. Characteristically, he valued this law primarily for its support of his mystical theory of cosmic harmony, which was based on geometric solids and musical intervals. The Third Law completed his mathematical description of planetary motion but remained isolated from his earlier laws until Newton later unified them through the concept of universal gravitation.

Kepler's practical masterpiece came with the publication of the Rudolphine Tables in 1627, named after his former patron, Emperor Rudolph II.

These astronomical tables included an expanded star catalog, logarithmic tables for calculations, and a gazetteer of world locations. Their creation involved overcoming extraordinary obstacles, including financial limitations (Kepler personally funded the printing), religious persecution, warfare, and even a fire that destroyed the printing shop.

The tables achieved unprecedented accuracy, remaining the standard astronomical reference for nearly a century. They represented the practical legacy of both Tycho's observations and Kepler's theoretical innovations.

In 1628, after completing the tables, Kepler accepted a position with Albrecht von Wallenstein, Duke of Friedland and Imperial Generalissimo. Wallenstein, one of the most powerful figures in the Thirty Years' War, sought Kepler's services primarily for astrological predictions to guide military and political decisions. Ironically, Kepler had cast Wallenstein's horoscope years earlier, in 1608 and again in 1624, accurately predicting that March 1634 would bring "dreadful disorders." Wallenstein would be assassinated in February 1634 after being accused of treason.

The relationship proved disappointing to both parties. While Kepler sought scientific patronage and working conditions, Wallenstein primarily wanted practical divination. When Wallenstein temporarily fell out of favor with the emperor in 1630, Kepler, now 58, found himself without support.

He embarked on a journey across war-torn Germany, seeking to recover salary arrears owed by the imperial chamber. This final journey concluded in Regensburg, where he passed away in November 1630. His burial site was later destroyed in the war and remains lost to history.

Kepler's three laws of planetary motion transformed astronomy by replacing complex geometric models with simple, elegant mathematical relationships. Yet their full significance wasn't recognized until Isaac Newton incorporated them into his theory of universal gravitation over half a century later. 

Historians have debated how to characterize Kepler's unique approach to science. Some emphasize his work as representing a crucial shift in scientific thinking—what Alfred North Whitehead described as "the union of passionate interest in the detailed facts with equal devotion to abstract generalization." Others focus on the peculiar mix of mysticism and empiricism in his methods. Arthur Koestler famously called him a "sleepwalker" who made discoveries while guided by mystical intuitions—a view recent historians have challenged, emphasizing his conscious methodological innovations.

What remains undisputed is Kepler's pivotal role in the Scientific Revolution. His work bridged medieval and modern approaches, incorporating Renaissance mysticism while anticipating Enlightenment empiricism. By insisting on physical causes rather than mere geometrical descriptions, he established a new standard where observations couldn't be ignored for convenience.

Perhaps most remarkable was his ability to maintain scientific productivity amid extraordinary personal, religious, and political challenges. His resilience ensured that Tycho's observational legacy would bear revolutionary fruit.

While Kepler was formulating his laws through intense mathematical labor, Galileo was taking a complementary path toward astronomical revolution. If Kepler was the theoretical architect, Galileo became the observational champion and public defender. Their approaches reflected their distinct personalities: Kepler, the introspective and mystical mathematician, worked in relative obscurity; Galileo, the extroverted experimentalist, operated in the cultural spotlight of Renaissance Italy.

Unlike Kepler, Galileo thrust the Copernican system into public consciousness through telescopic discoveries and accessible writings in Italian rather than scholarly Latin. In our next episode, we will pick up the story of Galileo and his telescope.

As always, maps and other supporting resources for all episodes are listed in the episode description. In the meantime, for more historical content, please visit the “I Take History With My Coffee” blog at itakehistory.com and also consider liking the I Take History With My Coffee Facebook page.  Feedback and comments are welcome at itakehistory@gmail.com.  Or you can leave a review on Apple Podcasts or on Spotify.  You can also help support this podcast by buying me a coffee at buymeacoffee.com/itakehistory.  If you know anyone else who would enjoy this podcast, please let them know.  And thanks for listening.