Dec. 1, 2023

What Is It Like To Receive Gene Therapy?

What Is It Like To Receive Gene Therapy?

In this podcast, Brian O’Mahony explores the patient experience of gene therapy for hemophilia, from the shared decision-making process prior to gene therapy, to the administration itself, to the intense follow-up in the first months and finally, the long-term follow-up. Brian is Chief Executive Officer of the Irish Haemophilia Society and a former president of the World Federation of Hemophilia and the European Haemophilia Consortium.

Canadian Hemophilia Society

 

Transcript

Matt Cundill 00:00
This is GENE THERAPY FOR HEMOPHILIA: DREAM OR REALITY?, a show on behalf of the Canadian Hemophilia Society. Here's your host, David Page.

David Page 00:11
Today's guest is Brian O’Mahony, Chief Executive Officer of the Irish Haemophilia Society, and a former president of the World Federation of Hemophilia and the European Hamophilia Consortium. But more importantly for today's discussion, Brian has experienced hemophilia gene therapy himself, firsthand. Welcome, Brian.

Brian O’Mahony

Thank you, David.

David Page

So right, you were part of a clinical trial in hemophilia B, is that correct?

Brian O’Mahony 00:38
That's correct. That's correct. I was part of the HOPE-B clinical trial.

David Page 00:41
Brian, you've asked me not to focus on the actual factor level that that you achieved following gene therapy in your particular case. Why is that?

Brian O’Mahony 00:51
I have no problem talking about that, David. But I think that's the wrong question to start with. Because people often ask me, “Okay, how did you get on with gene therapy?” And the real question you should be asking is, “Why did you decide to take gene therapy? What were your decision drivers?” Because, of course, I've had a good experience with gene therapy. But I had to be prepared for a range of potential experiences. And that's the key message: you can't talk to one person who's had gene therapy and say, “Okay, they've had a good outcome, that's what I'm going to get.” You've got to be prepared for a range of outcomes. So it's all about setting your expectations and managing expectations.

David Page 01:26
And they really can be from no expression whatsoever to a very high and perhaps too high level?

Brian O’Mahony 01:31
In terms of setting expectations, we don't know how long the factor expression will last. We have no idea of durability. We don't know how much factor expression you will get. You might get less than 1%. You might get 5%. You might get 50%. You might get 100%. You might get 180%. You just don't know and there's no way of predicting. You don't know if you'll be one of the percentage who don't get any response to gene therapy. You don't know if you’ll need steroids, for short to medium term, although you've got a fairly good idea from the results of trials. And in terms of long-term safety, there is a theoretical risk from insertional mutagenesis, and you don't know about that. So there are a range of things we still don't fully understand. And unlike any other therapy for hemophilia, if you're not getting the outcome you desire, then you can change the frequency, you can change the dose, you can change the product. With a mimetic, you can go back on a factor concentrate. With gene therapy, you get one injection, it goes into your liver, and your liver responds in a particular way, and then you get the outcome you get. And you can't really predict that. There's no way of predicting beforehand who will get a good outcome, who won't get a good outcome. So, if you go in saying I absolutely have to get a good outcome, then it's the wrong attitude. You need to be prepared for the range of outcomes that could occur.

David Page 02:45
So, with all of these uncertainties, can you tell us some of your motivations in considering and then receiving gene therapy?

Brian O’Mahony 02:51
I was involved in in bringing the companies over to Ireland to talk about gene therapy clinical trials for the last 10 years, I've been following the science for many years. So I kept up-to-date with the science and the publications. And frankly, I was convinced by the science that the benefit-risk ratio for me was worthwhile. I also wanted the chance of having a significant factor IX expression, which would hopefully mean I could stop prophylaxis and also perhaps have less pain in my damaged joints. I wanted some freedom ... mental freedom ... from dealing with my own hemophilia. Although given my job and my role, it's hard for me to get a hemophilia free mind because, of course, hemophilia consumes most of my day, every day. But having said that, it's been nice to be dealing with other people's hemophilia, not just my own. I wanted to lead. We've been talking for several years about participating in clinical trials. Nobody had taken the jump. So I thought I'd jump. I was the first to get on the clinical trial in Ireland. And also I wanted to try life without severe hemophilia. Life is not a dress rehearsal; you get one go around. And I thought ... you know ... I was born with severe hemophilia. I've always had severe hemophilia. It would be interesting to try some of my life without severe hemophilia.

David Page 03:59
In another podcast in the series, Dr. Jerry Teitel talks about the shared decision-making process from the physician’s perspective. Can you take us through the steps that you went through from your first interest to agreeing to receive the therapy?

Brian O’Mahony 04:12
Well, I suppose my journey was slightly different because of my background with WFH, EHC and the Irish Society. And I've got some science background. So I had a lot of meetings and discussions with the pharmaceutical companies making the gene therapy. I looked at the data on an ongoing basis. I spoke to clinicians abroad, who were friends and colleagues, and I got a range of opinions when I decided to enroll in the clinical trial. Of course, there's a significant pre-gene therapy lead-in phase of several months, which actually also gives you time to re-evaluate and think about your motivations and re-evaluate that. And then I also discussed the logistics and the visits with the research team because you have to get ready for all of the fairly large series of visits after gene therapy. Now having said that, that became much easier because of COVID, because I got gene therapy about two weeks before the COVID pandemic. So suddenly all of this travel that I was trying to fit in, in between my hospital visits, disappeared. So, in fact, in one sense, it was easier. So it wasn't a normal shared decision-making journey for me. I didn't have to have a series of detailed discussions with the investigator or the team. I'd been keeping up with this and organizing those meetings, in fact, for several years,

David Page 05:21
Who was involved in that process, in your own personal process before the final decision? I guess your treating physician? And what about your family?

Brian O’Mahony 05:29
My treating physician, the research nurse, some of my colleagues and friends abroad who are clinicians who had various views around gene therapy, some people with hemophilia, like yourself, David, with whom I discussed this. With my family, to some extent, but not an enormous extent. My wife and kids tend to trust my judgment on this. And I explained it to them, but we didn't have long, detailed discussions on this because they know that I'm very familiar with the therapeutic landscape. And they fully supported my decision on this.

David Page 05:57
What are some of the things people absolutely need to understand before embarking on this journey?

Brian O’Mahony 06:03
You need to set and manage your expectations. You don't know how long it will last. You don't know what factor expression you will get. You don't know if you're going to get any increase in factor expression. You don't know if you need to take steroids. And there's obviously some theoretical concerns around long-term safety. So you need to be prepared for a range of outcomes there. So, if you go in thinking, “I want at least 15 years, I want a factor level of at least 50%, and I don't want to take steroids, ” if you don't get that outcome, that it's a failure, then you're not ready for gene therapy, You need to be aware, “Okay, I'd like this factor expression. But I'm aware I could get this range. I'd like this durability, but I can’t predict that,” and be ready for steroids. So, for example, with steroids, for factor VIII gene therapy, about 80% of the people on the trial had to take steroids for an average of seven months. So, if you're going to take factor VIII gene therapy, I think you work on the assumption that you're going to have to take steroids. With the factor IX gene therapy that is licensed, it was under 20% needed steroids for a shorter period of time. So you could probably think I may have to take steroids but it's less likely, but you just need to be aware of the range of expressions that you get. That's really important. So if you're hoping for 50% and you get 5%, you're going to be disappointed, but you need to be able to say, ”Okay, well, I knew this was a possibility. And I'm okay with that.”

David Page 07:22
So you're trying to avoid buyer's remorse? I've heard you use that expression before.

Brian O’Mahony 07:27
Absolutely. Treatment remorse. You don't want to go back to the clinician ... I don't want any of our members coming back to us in a couple of years’ time saying, “I wish you hadn't persuaded me to take gene therapy.” We're not going to persuade anybody. We're not going to persuade or dissuade. We're going to try and make sure that everybody who's considering gene therapy takes a fully informed decision for themselves.

David Page 07:45
People might imagine that the administration of gene therapy is an elaborate process. Can you describe that day?

Brian O’Mahony 07:52
It's actually not an elaborate process. I was asked one question at a meeting abroad about how long I had to stay in hospital. And did they have to replace all my white cells? it took three hours. It's a simple infusion. It's like getting a bag of plasma. You go in. Obviously, they take some bloods. At the last minute, they check to make sure you want to go ahead with this. And then you get the infusion. The infusion itself took about 80 minutes. It's about a liter of liquid, a very easy process. So I was
quite relaxed. It was a very easy process. But having said that, when I looked around me, you're got the clinician, you're got the resource nurses. Outside, you had the clinic director, you had the research director, you had a crash team ready to go, So there were a lot of people looking on because it's the first gene therapy that was actually done in the hospital. A very easy process but I must say, when I went home that night, I was emotionally exhausted because I was aware, this was a fairly momentous day.

David Page 08:46
We've heard from guests in this podcast series about the importance of very close follow-up in the weeks and months following gene therapy. What was that like in your case?

Brian O’Mahony 08:56
In the first year after gene therapy, I had to make 30 visits to the hospital. Now you have to actually go in once a week for the first three months, I actually exceeded that. I went in twice a week to have an extra liver blood test done. So I certainly didn't want to take any chance of missing an increase in liver enzymes. And I didn't think once a week was often enough. So I did this. I was fully aware of this. And so I was committed to it. I'd set aside the time. And, in fact, because it was during the COVID pandemic, there was more of a concern about going to a hospital at that point in time, but they managed it very well in the non-clinical setting.

David Page

Why is this frequent follow-up so important?

Brian O’Mahony

Well, first of all, you need to know what your factor expression level is and how that's changing, and that can change. With the liver enzymes, you want to monitor liver enzymes very carefully. You can't take the chance of missing an increase in liver enzymes even for a couple of days because that could lead to a loss of expression of the factor and you can't get that back. You need to look at your ultrasound scans for your liver health, joint scores and also to add knowledge about outcomes. And so it really is very, very important. But certainly the factor expression level and the liver enzymes are both tests, by the way, which can be done in a local hospital.

David Page 10:09
So I think it's now been three years ... going on three years ... since your ...

Brian O’Mahony

Three years, three years, eight months. Three years, eight months.

David Page

You're into the long term follow up. What's that like?

Brian O’Mahony 10:20
It's very easy. Twice a year, and then twice also for on ultrasound. And once a year I go in for some joint scores and things. It's very easy. Twice a year is no problem whatsoever. So yeah, at this stage, it's settled down totally. I've had a very good response. My experience has been good. I've had no treatment remorse. But I would hope that if I was sitting here talking to you today, and I hadn't got a good factor expression, I'd still be able to say I don't have treatment remorse, because I’d thought through the possibilities beforehand.

David Page 10:48
So you would have been ready to go back to factor IX prophylaxis if you had to?

Brian O’Mahony

Yes, yes.

David Page

So gene therapy for hemophilia has been a dream for decades. Do you consider it now to be a reality?

Brian O’Mahony 11:01
Well, it is a reality for hemophilia A and hemophilia B, because there are licensed gene therapies for both indications. I think certainly the durability of the hemophilia B gene therapy looks very, very good. In hemophilia A, more variable, but I think this is the start. This is the start of a journey. So we have the first two licensed gene therapies, which is very exciting. But there will be other gene therapies following on from other companies. And we also have gene editing coming down the pipeline. So I think, as things move on, our expectations will change. If you look at the first really successful hemophilia gene therapy from UCL in London, they were getting factor IX expressions of one to three percent, three to four percent. And they've been sustained. And we thought that was really good. And you know, 10 to 12 years ago, three to four percent was a very exciting outcome. Now, that would not be seen as an exciting outcome. Now, the mean is like 30 or 40 percent. So I think expectations have changed. And I think that's a good thing. So I think expectations will change. And in the future, hopefully, we'll have options for gene therapy, maybe for those aged 12 or 14 and up, and maybe gene editing for the children.

David Page 12:07
Thank you, Brian, for doing this podcast and for all your work over many, many decades for hemophilia, and the bleeding disorder community.

Brian O’Mahony

Thank you, David.
For more information on gene therapy, we invite you to check out other podcasts in the series.

Matt Cundill 12:19
For more information. We invite you to check out more episodes in this series, HEMOPHILIA GENE THERAPY: DREAM OR REALITY? This podcast series was made possible by an unrestricted educational grant from Pfizer Canada to the Canadian Hemophilia Society.