This is a clear and concise example of what is wrong with our system. Why does it seem like podcasts and publicity is the only way to make the courts even look at a case, much less evaluate it without bias. How could an appellate court review the case files, obvious ineffective representation, new evidence and blatant corruption-then uphold this conviction? Why do we see so many cases of persistent persecution by prosecutors who let their ego outweigh truth and justice? Or is it fear they will have to provide a payout after decades wrongfully imprisoned? At the least, he deserves the retrial he is asking for. Wow.
Nov. 29, 2022 by Use? on Apple Podcasts