Transcript
WEBVTT
00:00:04.427 --> 00:00:08.013
Welcome to the Index Podcast hosted by Alex Kahaya.
00:00:08.720 --> 00:00:27.207
Plug in as we explore new frontiers with Web 3 and the decentralized future, hey everyone and welcome to the Index brought to you by the Graph, where we talk with the entrepreneurs building the next wave of the internet.
00:00:27.207 --> 00:00:29.025
I'm your host, Alex Kahaya.
00:00:29.025 --> 00:00:37.064
In today's episode, I'm excited to welcome Samuel Harcourt, director of Business Development at the Fantom Foundation.
00:00:37.064 --> 00:00:44.033
Phantom is a decentralized, permissionless, open source smart contract platform for decentralized applications.
00:00:44.033 --> 00:00:51.567
It is one of the leading blockchain networks created to offer an alternative to Ethereum, and I'm super interested to learn more about Phantom.
00:00:51.567 --> 00:00:52.844
Thanks so much for being here, sam.
00:00:52.844 --> 00:00:57.645
Let me know your background, like how you got into crypto, and then I would love to learn more about your role at Phantom.
00:00:58.719 --> 00:01:02.610
So I guess my experience is relatively boring to everything that's happening at Fantom.
00:01:02.610 --> 00:01:10.290
But just to keep it brief, coming from the Australian military, I went to work with one of Australia's first digital asset desks, called DCH.
00:01:10.290 --> 00:01:16.686
That was right in the middle of the bear market in 2018, so it was quite a ruthless time to join, but I really loved it.
00:01:16.686 --> 00:01:27.605
And then I worked down the road, essentially opening up my own digital asset desk where I hoped that crypto startups at that time raised some capital for Bitcoin mining companies, and then from there I joined Phantom.
00:01:28.239 --> 00:01:30.846
You were in the Australian military first, though that's interesting.
00:01:30.846 --> 00:01:31.828
What were you doing there?
00:01:32.310 --> 00:01:32.951
I was a raffleman.
00:01:32.951 --> 00:01:34.344
It was an interesting time.
00:01:34.344 --> 00:01:36.224
I'm glad to be doing a different thing now.
00:01:36.224 --> 00:01:38.710
But yeah, it's a good experience and quite valuable to say.
00:01:39.019 --> 00:01:40.686
So you were at this trading desk.
00:01:40.686 --> 00:01:41.507
What did you call it?
00:01:42.159 --> 00:01:45.790
Digital asset desks, just hoping that a lot of the crypto clients that were coming in.
00:01:45.790 --> 00:01:50.947
They were raising capital for pretty crazy things back then and I was just saying like this is legit or this doesn't seem legit.
00:01:50.947 --> 00:01:52.465
It was quite an interesting time.
00:01:52.959 --> 00:01:55.487
It's interesting that you were doing that during that bear market.
00:01:55.487 --> 00:02:07.430
I got into this space in 2016, and I was, like, I would say, the first half of the upswing and I went all the way up with the bull market and then all the way down the other side.
00:02:07.430 --> 00:02:11.169
I was at every single conference in this space back then.
00:02:11.169 --> 00:02:15.792
I was traveling two, three days a week and the conferences were nuts.
00:02:15.792 --> 00:02:18.968
They were just packed with just so much ridiculousness.
00:02:18.968 --> 00:02:24.080
The CEO of the company I was working with, skyname7, who was one of the co-founders at the market.
00:02:24.080 --> 00:02:30.753
He asked me to audit the top 50 projects by Marketcap on CoinMarketCap.
00:02:30.753 --> 00:02:44.335
I had not really been in this space before, so I went through every single one of them and I went really deep, went through all their websites, went through all their founders' backgrounds, read all the white papers and everything and I came away from being like holy shit.
00:02:45.117 --> 00:02:46.081
Two of these are good.
00:02:46.081 --> 00:02:49.485
The rest of them are super sketchy.
00:02:49.485 --> 00:02:52.807
So many of them were sketchy, but it did teach me a lot.
00:02:52.807 --> 00:02:53.830
I can relate.
00:02:53.830 --> 00:02:57.088
It was kind of a similar exercise to what you were doing in 2018.
00:02:57.088 --> 00:03:01.189
I'm wondering what the deal flow looked like in 2018.
00:03:01.189 --> 00:03:12.088
There were some crazy things getting built Crazy for me back then was this is some random ICO that I have no idea how it has a billion dollar market cap, but what were you seeing in 2018?
00:03:12.088 --> 00:03:13.844
Anything interesting pop up that you looked at.
00:03:14.860 --> 00:03:19.799
Nothing that I would mention today because it all was a lot of crazy ideas.
00:03:19.799 --> 00:03:22.483
Just trying to get involved with the space One, I did join.
00:03:22.483 --> 00:03:27.187
I missed that fun part that you were talking about and I always just hear stories about that massive run up.
00:03:27.187 --> 00:03:35.227
I joined on the other side of that, so it was all depressing People just going home early because they're just sick of seeing double digit reds every day.
00:03:35.247 --> 00:03:36.911
Yeah, dude, I remember.
00:03:38.461 --> 00:03:45.748
So a lot of ideas in that time were quite crazy and I think, being a fresh eyes into the space then I was able to say, no, this is quite a crazy idea.
00:03:45.748 --> 00:03:47.627
I don't think you guys should go down this path.
00:03:47.627 --> 00:03:51.689
There were some interesting ones but none of them kind of lasted up until today.
00:03:51.689 --> 00:03:53.987
I guess more into what I do at Phantom.
00:03:53.987 --> 00:03:55.344
It's a BD role.
00:03:55.344 --> 00:03:57.306
It's covered in three different verticals.
00:03:57.560 --> 00:04:01.251
The first one would be inbound, so dealing with applications who want to come to Fantom.
00:04:01.251 --> 00:04:02.825
They want to learn about deploying on the network.
00:04:02.825 --> 00:04:05.407
They want access, maybe some marketing together.
00:04:05.407 --> 00:04:07.086
They want access to a watchdog program.
00:04:07.086 --> 00:04:10.127
They want some sort of foundation guidance.
00:04:10.127 --> 00:04:15.069
Sometimes when deploying Not everyone does, but we are here for that supportive growth of the network.
00:04:15.069 --> 00:04:16.322
And then on.
00:04:16.341 --> 00:04:22.249
The second one would be outbound, so dealing with some pitches, governments, companies across the world, finding synergies where we can.
00:04:22.249 --> 00:04:31.826
I think the space is still early and there's a lot to build and to understand before we can find massive synergies, but nevertheless we do have great conversations with different verticals, I guess you'd say.
00:04:31.826 --> 00:04:34.288
And then the last one would be internal operations.
00:04:34.288 --> 00:04:39.072
So a good example of this would be Rainier hackathon that we've just launched with AWS and Covalent.
00:04:39.072 --> 00:04:42.045
That's still got about 10 days to go, so if anyone's keen, they want to join that.
00:04:42.045 --> 00:04:43.807
Check out our DevPost website.
00:04:43.807 --> 00:04:46.247
You can still get involved over 200K in prizes.
00:04:46.247 --> 00:04:49.428
There's lots of prizes to get around there.
00:04:49.428 --> 00:04:53.122
That's essentially what I'm up to, as well as some other little things that we'll talk about today.
00:04:53.122 --> 00:04:58.747
Which I really like to highlight is our own program, our vaults and a few other things that we're working on at the foundation.
00:04:59.660 --> 00:05:04.211
How did you get from where you were working when you entered crypto to phantom?
00:05:04.211 --> 00:05:05.444
How did you meet the team?
00:05:05.444 --> 00:05:06.562
What was that like?
00:05:06.562 --> 00:05:08.786
What inspired you to want to join?
00:05:09.439 --> 00:05:10.704
There's a street called Pidstreet.
00:05:10.704 --> 00:05:18.011
The offices were on the same street and we actually had a mutual connection back in the day called Stephen Bollotti to Michael Kohn today.
00:05:18.011 --> 00:05:21.829
So just friends of friends, and they kind of needed to be a good D-Guy back there.
00:05:21.829 --> 00:05:23.345
I was willing to jump on board.
00:05:23.899 --> 00:05:27.009
I don't know a ton about phantom and its founders.
00:05:27.009 --> 00:05:36.264
Can you just walk me through the Genesis story of the company and just from your knowledge, and just give us a little history lesson on why phantom exists and who's behind it?
00:05:37.005 --> 00:05:40.194
The Phantom's history really started just after I joined.
00:05:40.324 --> 00:05:50.911
I know that sounds a bit ego-tistical, but from when the mainnet launched in 2019, andre, michael Kwan those are the true guys who have formed what we're using today and built the technology that we have today.
00:05:50.911 --> 00:05:56.351
And then from there, it's been almost four years of operation, 99.9% uptime.
00:05:56.351 --> 00:05:59.990
And, yeah, there's actually a big scoop about the foundation I can provide.
00:05:59.990 --> 00:06:09.892
Everyone is very straightforward, everyone's very direct, which I really love, so everyone's just really focused on building out the network technology and, I guess, the mission of the foundation.
00:06:09.892 --> 00:06:18.334
I can give you something that's quite cliche, like oh, we want to onboard a billion people or we want to dominate the world with blockchain technology.
00:06:18.334 --> 00:06:20.050
I can give you something a little bit more specific.
00:06:20.050 --> 00:06:22.752
One side would be it's very tech-focused.
00:06:22.752 --> 00:06:27.673
So the work that the R&D side is doing with Phantom Virtual Machine, it's just brilliant.
00:06:27.673 --> 00:06:35.689
If you want to watch one of Michael Kong or Andre's speeches about that, they can tell you way more insights and give you a much better, I guess, analysis of what's been built.
00:06:35.689 --> 00:06:43.194
But a big takeaway there is about 200 to 300 million transactions will be able to be executed on chain per day.
00:06:43.194 --> 00:06:53.791
That's what the data's been telling us, that's what it's forecasted, and that's pretty incredible to me, because if you add up every L1, l2, sidechain subnet and put all those transactions together.
00:06:53.791 --> 00:06:54.790
It won't mean that threshold.
00:06:54.790 --> 00:07:01.053
So it's quite an amazing milestone to hit and I'm super excited to see that roll out later this year.
00:07:01.704 --> 00:07:06.990
And then, on the other side of everything, it's what I come to plan with a bit more it's on the demand side.
00:07:06.990 --> 00:07:09.052
So there's so much supply side to that block space.
00:07:09.052 --> 00:07:10.389
We need to fill that with demand.
00:07:10.389 --> 00:07:11.552
That's my mission.
00:07:11.552 --> 00:07:15.889
And really focusing on gas-paid-to-the-network transactions daily.
00:07:15.889 --> 00:07:21.872
Back in 2021, in the DeFi summer, I think TVL was such a big metric.
00:07:21.872 --> 00:07:28.045
Everyone just you know, probably said about TVL right, and we hit a peak TVL of about $14 billion.
00:07:28.045 --> 00:07:32.992
It doesn't increase the speed of the network, it doesn't increase security, it doesn't increase validated rewards.
00:07:32.992 --> 00:07:37.273
It's great for DeFi, but that's just one component of what can be built on the blockchain.
00:07:37.273 --> 00:07:42.091
So that's I guess the other side of what we're focused on is those transactions and gas-paid-to-the-network.
00:07:42.593 --> 00:07:42.934
Interesting.
00:07:42.934 --> 00:07:44.651
Yeah, that makes a ton of sense to me.
00:07:44.651 --> 00:07:46.591
I mean, I spent a long time thinking about this.
00:07:46.591 --> 00:07:49.548
It's like how do you bootstrap a network and create this demand?
00:07:49.548 --> 00:07:50.552
It's a marketplace, right.
00:07:50.552 --> 00:07:56.711
You have validators who are running the chain and providing the security and they get paid for that service.
00:07:56.711 --> 00:07:57.649
Who's paying for it?
00:07:57.649 --> 00:07:57.930
Right?
00:07:57.930 --> 00:08:04.793
It's a very interesting decentralized business model to try to get off the ground, and it's still early days for pretty much everybody.
00:08:04.793 --> 00:08:11.850
Still like even Ethereum, which has tons of transaction volume, or Solana right, it's still really early.
00:08:12.464 --> 00:08:17.353
Just on transactions it is transactions with gas-paid, but it's not validators talking to each other.
00:08:17.353 --> 00:08:22.512
It's a user coming to the network paying to do some sort of transaction and then not going through and going to validators.
00:08:22.884 --> 00:08:25.233
How do you think about driving that demand?
00:08:25.233 --> 00:08:35.134
And when you have a partner that you're trying to attract to build on the chain, what are you telling them to try to convince them to use your stack versus somebody else's?
00:08:35.644 --> 00:08:37.291
There's a lot of things we can talk about.
00:08:37.291 --> 00:08:42.472
That, I guess, set us apart from other O1s out there and there's a lot of O1s out there L2s.
00:08:42.472 --> 00:08:44.751
It's becoming quite a competitive space, which is good.
00:08:44.751 --> 00:08:46.671
We can talk about phantom speed.
00:08:46.671 --> 00:08:51.173
You can get a sub-second time to finality, and when I say finality I mean true finality.
00:08:51.173 --> 00:08:53.889
So we don't have any reorgs on chain or longest chain rule, which is cool.
00:08:53.889 --> 00:08:55.370
We've had a great uptime.
00:08:55.370 --> 00:09:01.892
We have, I guess, all these scalability side that's going to come with Fender Virtual Machine, with the 200 or 300 million transactions per day.
00:09:01.892 --> 00:09:08.509
But some unique factors that I think do draw in people to Fender that we've released recently, which was the vault.
00:09:08.509 --> 00:09:10.491
So the vault is quite a unique idea.
00:09:10.491 --> 00:09:12.692
It's essentially a never-ending grant program.
00:09:12.692 --> 00:09:20.611
It's not funded by the foundation, it's funded by 10% of all the gas paid to the network and that goes to a contract address and anybody can apply for those funds.
00:09:20.611 --> 00:09:22.230
That just have to make a governance proposal.
00:09:22.230 --> 00:09:30.774
Now we've had a little bit of trouble with voter app, I guess, and people making proposals and having to pitch it to all the validators is quite a hard thing to do.
00:09:30.774 --> 00:09:38.070
So we are looking to work with Gitcoin at the moment and just do a quarterly distribution round of the funds, and it's quite a significant amount.
00:09:38.070 --> 00:09:44.393
I mean, it's only been up for a few months and it's already over 500,000 fans, in which is 100,000 and something dollars.
00:09:44.393 --> 00:09:46.331
It's quite cool to see that idea.
00:09:46.331 --> 00:09:54.292
That's even if the foundation would go away today, but there's a grant program that's going to keep supporting development of the community through Gitcoin, which is a really cool idea.
00:09:54.465 --> 00:09:57.549
And then the other side of bringing demand would be our earn program.
00:09:57.549 --> 00:10:03.489
So before I get into the earn program, we can look back to the early days of the internet and Bill Gates.
00:10:03.489 --> 00:10:05.530
Although he's a bit of a controversial character now.
00:10:05.530 --> 00:10:25.355
He wrote a pretty good essay called Content is King, and in the essay he wrote for the internet to thrive, content creators need to get paid for their work, and that's the exact situation that I see today in blockchain is that for blockchain to survive, dabs need to get paid for their work, and a lot of them just don't have sustainable business models.
00:10:25.355 --> 00:10:28.951
It's either you raise from VCs, then hope you can build something.
00:10:28.951 --> 00:10:31.974
It's crazy fees that you have to charge your users.
00:10:31.974 --> 00:10:34.511
It's just really hard for them to find a balance there.
00:10:35.105 --> 00:10:39.734
And then we looked at what applications are doing and applications are bringing the demand to the block space.
00:10:39.734 --> 00:10:43.250
For us it's about splitting that demand that they bring with them.
00:10:43.250 --> 00:10:51.725
So we've done something called the OEM program, also known as gas monetization, where depths can get 15% back of all the gas that's been spent on their contracts.
00:10:51.725 --> 00:10:58.455
And you're probably like Sam you've just been talking about phantom, virtual machine, and transactions on phantom are quite low cost.
00:10:58.455 --> 00:11:00.100
You know it's about a cent per transaction.
00:11:00.100 --> 00:11:03.493
So what's 15% of that is a fair point.
00:11:03.594 --> 00:11:07.649
But we had some really positive results so far in our beta program with Stargate.
00:11:07.649 --> 00:11:14.706
So Stargate in their first two weeks and about 6000 phantom annualized, that's 150,000 phantom and that's from one contract.
00:11:14.706 --> 00:11:16.802
So we've been able to give them a whole.
00:11:16.802 --> 00:11:41.440
You know they still haven't claimed, but it just shows you the power of earn because they didn't have that revenue before and now they do by us just creating this own program and we're hoping that that, along with the I think about 1670 and other participants, and at the moment we're kind of incentivizing to really think about how the network should grow and align both the validators and the depths together to focus on the one thing that really matters, which is transactions on chain.
00:11:41.480 --> 00:11:51.783
So I really think that that's a fantastic idea and I've heard people talk about something similar, but I haven't actually heard of someone actually like I didn't know that you guys were doing that actually testing it out.
00:11:51.783 --> 00:11:58.758
I mean, look, there are not like very many applications in our space like Web three that have product market fit.
00:11:58.758 --> 00:12:03.038
Yet creating decentralized business models around that is hard, it's unknown, it's totally new.
00:12:03.038 --> 00:12:10.142
I think charging for the execution of the smart contracts is pretty smart, especially when it's aligned with the fee structure on chain.
00:12:10.142 --> 00:12:14.442
The balance you have to strike is fast and cheap, like scalable infrastructure.
00:12:14.442 --> 00:12:30.687
If application developers are having to charge on top of the fees that the chain charges, then now you're kind of degrading that value prop, which for, I think, for us to see mainstream scalable applications, you got to keep that alignment, otherwise you just you kind of break some of the value propositions.
00:12:31.532 --> 00:12:52.769
The product market fit issue is something I think we're all striving towards solving and I think part of it comes from just making sure that the network has all the tooling it needs to enable these developers to build applications quickly not just the smart contracts, but like everything above that that then creates the user experiences that consumers are in.
00:12:52.769 --> 00:12:54.816
Enterprises are like expecting a need.
00:12:54.816 --> 00:12:58.966
I've spent a lot of time trying to solve that problem, the last like I don't know two years.
00:12:58.966 --> 00:13:03.855
I think we've come up with some interesting solutions there, but yeah, it's a tough nut to crack.
00:13:04.236 --> 00:13:10.303
Yeah, there's a lot of ideas that are being placed now and I think we're going to see in like three to four years which one's really pale.
00:13:10.303 --> 00:13:12.011
So I believe in the IRM program.
00:13:12.011 --> 00:13:16.524
I think it's a great idea because, like you mentioned, users are getting hit with multiple layers of fees.
00:13:16.524 --> 00:13:18.389
They're getting fees when they're doing the transaction.
00:13:18.389 --> 00:13:21.799
They're getting some sort of fee when interacting with the application generally.
00:13:21.799 --> 00:13:25.053
So it is just better to have it one fee at the transaction layer.
00:13:25.075 --> 00:13:42.758
In my opinion, if you devote that too much and applications get to the point where you know there's barely any gas being spent, then the validators all going to have nothing to run on maybe some sort of inflationary token idea, but you need something to sustain validators and the hardware costs I mean for fans.
00:13:42.758 --> 00:13:57.748
Another cool component of the FEM I can highlight a little bit would be that essentially, they've managed to reduce the storage requirements by about 95%, and I run a validator and the storage is about 50% of my costs.
00:13:57.748 --> 00:14:05.503
So being able to bring that down like by 50% is a massive, important part of making blockchain accessible and making sure it's a sustainable network.
00:14:05.503 --> 00:14:10.208
And then the other side is obviously, you know, the cost of the incentive to run a validator, and that's what gas is all about.
00:14:10.208 --> 00:14:12.399
Right, it's incentivizing the security of the network.
00:14:12.760 --> 00:14:15.715
What kind of hardware do you need to run a validator on Fantom?
00:14:17.258 --> 00:14:18.580
I use AWS.
00:14:18.580 --> 00:14:21.384
I use a 2x large.
00:14:21.384 --> 00:14:23.467
I'm not exactly sure right now.
00:14:23.489 --> 00:14:29.032
Double check We'll look it up and we'll put some notes in the show notes if anybody's curious for how to run a validator.
00:14:29.032 --> 00:14:33.182
On Phantom, I mentioned before the show I'm becoming a hard-bird nerd.
00:14:33.182 --> 00:14:42.346
I'm just very interested in the different infrastructure requirements for different chains and how you think about decentralization and how many nodes you have on the network.
00:14:42.346 --> 00:14:43.513
How are they getting hardware?
00:14:43.513 --> 00:14:44.975
How expensive is it?
00:14:44.975 --> 00:14:46.900
These high throughput chains?
00:14:46.900 --> 00:14:48.692
That's a big challenge.
00:14:48.692 --> 00:14:57.169
The more scalable you become, typically the more hardware you require to run a node, which means the operations get more expensive.
00:14:57.169 --> 00:15:02.611
For people listening, if it sounds like we're talking about a validator as a small business, that's exactly right.
00:15:02.611 --> 00:15:04.076
They are small businesses.
00:15:04.076 --> 00:15:10.283
They're usually one or two people running a bunch of nodes in different networks that they need to make money on.
00:15:10.283 --> 00:15:12.091
It's just like any other investment.
00:15:12.091 --> 00:15:12.913
They put money into it.
00:15:12.913 --> 00:15:18.264
They want to get some kind of profit back out In a volatile market, in a new emerging market, that can be tough.
00:15:18.264 --> 00:15:24.982
There's all these token economic incentives and different ideas that people are experimenting with to make that work.
00:15:26.071 --> 00:15:29.322
Yeah, we have about 60 something validators at the moment.
00:15:29.322 --> 00:15:37.230
We've just reduced the self-staking requirement from 500,000 to 50,000 Fantom, obviously making that a lot more accessible to everyone.
00:15:37.230 --> 00:15:40.780
It's interesting to see different networks on how they're exploring that.
00:15:40.780 --> 00:15:43.744
Fantom is becoming, I'd say, more decentralized every day.
00:15:43.744 --> 00:15:53.672
Every time I'm trying to get some sort of governance proposal passed, I'm running around two validators all across the world trying to say, hey, please vote for this or encourage them to vote, just to push things past.
00:15:53.672 --> 00:15:55.034
That's a cool aspect.
00:15:55.034 --> 00:15:57.601
I'm seeing in real time of how decentralized we're getting.
00:15:57.601 --> 00:15:59.899
It's quite cool to see that in first person.
00:16:00.260 --> 00:16:08.109
You see on Twitter all this heated debate about how decentralized one thing is, one chain is versus another, and the merits and how they calculate it.
00:16:08.109 --> 00:16:10.052
The way I look at it is dude.
00:16:10.052 --> 00:16:14.721
We're all trying to figure it out, everybody's trying to figure it out and striving for that path.
00:16:14.721 --> 00:16:18.517
I always like to just hear what people's ideas are, even if they're not like.
00:16:18.517 --> 00:16:19.942
I work in the Solana ecosystem.
00:16:19.942 --> 00:16:26.509
I think there's a lot people can learn from how we built the network and how decentralized it is today.
00:16:26.509 --> 00:16:28.176
I think we can learn from other people too.
00:16:29.160 --> 00:16:37.316
I think there's always this fear that people are just going to nitpick, they're going to arm share quarterback about how decentralized you are or whatever, and the things you're choosing to do.
00:16:37.316 --> 00:16:46.971
Typically, those people are the loud voices out there are not the ones that are actually boots on the ground in the trenches trying to solve these problems.
00:16:46.971 --> 00:16:48.096
I find that a lot.
00:16:48.096 --> 00:16:53.215
They really have not actually tried to solve the problem in a meaningful way.
00:16:53.215 --> 00:16:55.164
It's more than just technology.
00:16:55.164 --> 00:16:58.337
There's business development involved, there's hustle, there's people.
00:16:58.337 --> 00:17:02.413
Really, the social consensus is the thing that drives a lot of these networks.
00:17:02.413 --> 00:17:05.101
It's the human beings that are actually running the validators.
00:17:05.101 --> 00:17:06.332
Humans are tough.
00:17:06.332 --> 00:17:09.476
They're tough to work with Aaron Ross.
00:17:09.516 --> 00:17:10.619
I love people like myself.
00:17:10.619 --> 00:17:12.467
They sell the validator.
00:17:12.467 --> 00:17:13.250
They haven't seen it for a while.
00:17:13.250 --> 00:17:15.140
You just get updates saying everything's running fine.
00:17:15.140 --> 00:17:17.150
You're not looking at governance proposals.
00:17:17.150 --> 00:17:19.201
You're not looking at things to interact with the network.
00:17:19.201 --> 00:17:21.454
A lot of the time, I can put myself in a lot of people's shoes.
00:17:21.454 --> 00:17:22.500
They have their jobs.
00:17:22.500 --> 00:17:27.042
They run a validator on the side and not really focused on the work related to the use that come up to vote.
00:17:27.424 --> 00:17:29.593
Like you said, everyone's a person running a validator.
00:17:29.593 --> 00:17:30.595
That's a good point.
00:17:30.595 --> 00:17:33.951
I'd also say it's not just the amount of validators on a network.
00:17:33.951 --> 00:17:37.201
That doesn't just mean decentralization on proof of stake.
00:17:37.201 --> 00:17:39.517
It's to make on how much is staked at where.
00:17:39.517 --> 00:17:41.967
I mean how distributed is that stake.
00:17:41.967 --> 00:17:43.713
There's lots of angles to tackle that.
00:17:44.191 --> 00:17:45.273
Chris, yeah, it's stake.
00:17:45.273 --> 00:17:47.961
It's also depending on the hardware requirements.
00:17:47.961 --> 00:17:55.217
If you're able to validate a chain on a laptop, then that can get really decentralized really fast because it's super inexpensive.
00:17:55.217 --> 00:17:57.626
Inexpensive and a lot of people have laptops.
00:17:57.626 --> 00:18:00.095
Buddy of mine, al Morissi, runs Koi Network.
00:18:00.095 --> 00:18:05.777
I don't know if you've heard of Koi, but really cool decentralized compute network.
00:18:05.777 --> 00:18:07.540
Actually really interesting token.
00:18:07.540 --> 00:18:09.214
You should take a look at the token economics.