Leave us a review in the app store!
Nov. 5, 2024

E109: Top Tier Capital Partners ($7.9B AUM) - Lessons Learned from Investing in 450 Funds

E109: Top Tier Capital Partners ($7.9B AUM) - Lessons Learned from Investing in 450 Funds
The player is loading ...

Ben Challgren, Principal at Top Tier Capital Partners sits down with David Weisburd to discuss what makes a top-performing fund, the surprising role of local managers in European venture success and the secrets to spotting a winning startup before it’s big.

The 10X Capital Podcast now receives more than 170,000 downloads a month. Are you interested in sponsoring an episode? Please email me at David@10xcapital.com.

SPONSOR:

Carta is the all-in-one suite for private fund operations. Carta’s software-based approach takes fund administration out of the spreadsheet and into the modern age with powerful solutions and intuitive interfaces, all on one platform. Their suite of products and expert services help funds at any stage with up-to-date insights and automated workflows to get them to the next level. Learn more at: https://z.carta.com/10xpod

X / Twitter: @dweisburd (David Weisburd) @TTCP_SF (Top Tier Capital Partners)

LinkedIn: David Weisburd: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dweisburd/ Ben Challgren: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ben-challgren-aa0b2b98/ Top Tier Capital Partners: https://www.linkedin.com/company/top-tier-capital-partners/

Links: Top Tier Capital Partners: https://ttcp.com/

Questions or topics you want us to discuss on The 10X Capital Podcast? Email us at david@10xcapital.com

TIMESTAMPS:

(0:00) Episode Preview (2:17) Exploring secondary opportunities in the market (5:03) Strategies for assessing new fund managers (7:31) The impact of ecosystems on venture success (10:01) Client categories for venture fund of funds (12:33) Sector-specific vs. generalist investment strategies (14:06) Sponsor: Carta (21:14) Relationship dynamics with top-tier funds (24:03) Addressing concerns regarding market beta (25:11) The evolving landscape of fund of funds and new strategies (26:43) Chasing pure alpha in fund of funds investing (27:43) Understanding power laws in fund investing (30:05) Closing remarks
Transcript
1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:01,439
Venture capital fund funds.

2
00:00:01,439 --> 00:00:04,960
We manage about $8,000,000,000 Firm's been
around for the years.

3
00:00:04,960 --> 00:00:07,599
How much risk is it that a couple of your funds
don't perform?

4
00:00:07,599 --> 00:00:09,460
Venture's more risky inherently.

5
00:00:09,679 --> 00:00:11,859
450 funds, 100 managers.

6
00:00:12,175 --> 00:00:15,855
When you're looking at a new manager, are you
just looking for pure alpha who could make the

7
00:00:15,855 --> 00:00:16,595
best decisions?

8
00:00:16,734 --> 00:00:21,375
The dirty little secret of Venture Capital is
that you want all the best talent to stay and

9
00:00:21,375 --> 00:00:25,074
help grow a growth stage company, but those
make some of the best founders.

10
00:00:25,135 --> 00:00:27,660
So people aggressively target that talent.

11
00:00:27,660 --> 00:00:30,559
Every venture pitch you get is pretty exciting
and interesting.

12
00:00:30,619 --> 00:00:32,619
No one boring really starts a venture fund.

13
00:00:32,619 --> 00:00:34,399
It's the top 5% of society.

14
00:00:35,420 --> 00:00:37,420
Ben, welcome to the 10X Capital podcast.

15
00:00:37,420 --> 00:00:38,379
Thanks for having me.

16
00:00:38,379 --> 00:00:39,420
Thanks for coming on.

17
00:00:39,659 --> 00:00:40,795
So what is top Tier Capital?

18
00:00:40,795 --> 00:00:41,354
We're a

19
00:00:41,354 --> 00:00:42,635
venture capital fund of funds.

20
00:00:42,635 --> 00:00:46,255
We manage about $8,000,000,000 Firm's been
around for years.

21
00:00:46,475 --> 00:00:48,335
Offices, San Francisco, Boston.

22
00:00:48,395 --> 00:00:52,635
I just moved down outside of New York, and then
we have an office in London as well.

23
00:00:52,635 --> 00:00:55,614
How critical are you guys to be on the ground
next to your managers?

24
00:00:55,789 --> 00:00:57,070
It's a relationship thing.

25
00:00:57,070 --> 00:01:02,909
So, I mean, back in, when the firm started,
everybody wanted access to Silicon Valley Tech.

26
00:01:02,909 --> 00:01:07,790
And for us to have a local presence, feet on
the street, and be seen in the market was super

27
00:01:07,790 --> 00:01:09,709
important to our global LP base.

28
00:01:09,709 --> 00:01:15,604
Just to to get the real truth of what's going
on, I think we have a firm wide belief that

29
00:01:15,604 --> 00:01:17,844
it's important to be local in the markets that
matter.

30
00:01:17,844 --> 00:01:19,604
And what's your products look like?

31
00:01:19,604 --> 00:01:22,965
I know you have the primary fund of funds, but
what other products do you have?

32
00:01:22,965 --> 00:01:24,744
The last investment cycle was about
1,500,000,000.

33
00:01:25,204 --> 00:01:28,129
So 2 thirds of that is primary capital.

34
00:01:28,129 --> 00:01:30,049
So investments end up venture funds.

35
00:01:30,049 --> 00:01:31,890
We only do venture across all of that.

36
00:01:31,890 --> 00:01:37,890
So, 5 to $10,000,000 checks into kind of new
relationships, new managers, emerging managers,

37
00:01:37,890 --> 00:01:43,915
whatever you want to call them, up to kind of
20 to 40 and and more brand name stuff.

38
00:01:43,915 --> 00:01:49,114
And then the other third of our 1,000,000,000 5
this last cycle was or is secondaries and

39
00:01:49,114 --> 00:01:49,995
direct investments.

40
00:01:49,995 --> 00:01:54,810
And so we'll do all different sorts of
secondaries, whether that be LP stakes, GP

41
00:01:54,810 --> 00:01:58,969
stakes, direct company, secondaries, all over
the map.

42
00:01:58,969 --> 00:02:03,224
And then for the equity checks and co
investments, what we call it, that's

43
00:02:03,545 --> 00:02:09,004
predominantly Series B, C ish tech companies, a
lot of enterprise tech, some consumer.

44
00:02:09,145 --> 00:02:13,384
Over the years, biotech has been tough for us
to kind of wrap our heads around and leave that

45
00:02:13,384 --> 00:02:15,544
to the experts most days.

46
00:02:15,544 --> 00:02:17,790
So the team is split, really.

47
00:02:17,790 --> 00:02:22,830
So you either predominantly focus on primaries
or predominantly focus on secondaries and

48
00:02:22,830 --> 00:02:23,330
directs.

49
00:02:23,390 --> 00:02:26,110
And so I spend my time on the primary side of
the business.

50
00:02:26,110 --> 00:02:31,395
But the reality is, is we're co investors and
we only invest in things from our hiring book

51
00:02:31,395 --> 00:02:32,675
on the secondary indirect side.

52
00:02:32,675 --> 00:02:37,155
And so when things come in through somebody's
relationship on the primary side, it gets

53
00:02:37,155 --> 00:02:40,194
passed over the secondary side for
underwriting, but you're still on the kind of

54
00:02:40,194 --> 00:02:42,675
deal team for relationship management, let's
say.

55
00:02:42,675 --> 00:02:47,039
As Q3 2024, what kind of secondary
opportunities are in the market?

56
00:02:47,039 --> 00:02:52,319
I mean, I think there's a lot of people trying
to figure out, what value is and what what

57
00:02:52,319 --> 00:02:54,319
people are willing to part with.

58
00:02:54,319 --> 00:02:58,814
I think everyone last year thought there was
going to be a huge rush to sell secondaries,

59
00:02:59,034 --> 00:03:02,474
and, oh, what a time to be buying, and you can
get things for 50 off.

60
00:03:02,474 --> 00:03:07,675
Like, reality is not that much volume traded in
the venture market, and it's because, I mean,

61
00:03:07,675 --> 00:03:12,189
2022, the venture market was down, like, 35%
from highs.

62
00:03:12,189 --> 00:03:17,310
And so if I'm the CIO sitting there looking at
cleaning up my book, like, I'm gonna be down

63
00:03:17,310 --> 00:03:23,775
35% and then take another 50% haircut and sell
it for some cash, like, I think we'll just

64
00:03:23,775 --> 00:03:24,275
wait.

65
00:03:24,335 --> 00:03:26,574
And and I think they're probably right to do
that.

66
00:03:26,574 --> 00:03:32,895
And so today, I mean, when you see, portfolios
being traded, they're kind of in the 25 ish

67
00:03:32,895 --> 00:03:33,294
discount.

68
00:03:33,294 --> 00:03:37,534
I mean, you still see the occasional 50% where
somebody just doesn't wanna be in a manager

69
00:03:37,534 --> 00:03:41,909
anymore or maybe a CIO regime change, and they
just don't buy venture.

70
00:03:41,909 --> 00:03:42,549
They don't care.

71
00:03:42,549 --> 00:03:44,629
They wanna rotate whatever cash they can.

72
00:03:44,629 --> 00:03:48,949
You see a bit of that, but for the most part,
the venture market on the secondary side.

73
00:03:48,949 --> 00:03:51,689
And now I'm talking LP stakes, with all these
discounts.

74
00:03:52,205 --> 00:03:57,584
The LP stakes, I mean, really, yeah, call it
20, 25 up to 35, 40.

75
00:03:57,644 --> 00:04:01,245
20, 25 up to 35 of the last valuation, last
quarter?

76
00:04:01,245 --> 00:04:01,405
Yeah.

77
00:04:01,405 --> 00:04:01,644
Yeah.

78
00:04:01,644 --> 00:04:05,084
So everything prices off at quarter end NAV,
basically.

79
00:04:05,084 --> 00:04:10,509
So we get our capital account balance for q2
here in a couple of weeks.

80
00:04:10,569 --> 00:04:16,009
And so then I could take that pricing and say,
like, it's 35% discount off of that.

81
00:04:16,009 --> 00:04:20,009
Some people you'll hear people say, like, Oh,
it traded at $0.85 on the dollar or something.

82
00:04:20,009 --> 00:04:23,254
Well, that's a 15% discount, like the lingo.

83
00:04:23,314 --> 00:04:27,714
Curious, why are discounts so high given that
there are quite a few secondary buyers

84
00:04:27,714 --> 00:04:28,354
coming down?

85
00:04:28,354 --> 00:04:28,915
For sure.

86
00:04:28,915 --> 00:04:34,354
But a lot of the AUM, for people who buy
secondaries, has gone into strategies focused

87
00:04:34,354 --> 00:04:36,035
on buyout and growth stage companies.

88
00:04:36,035 --> 00:04:42,259
I mean, these profitable businesses, it is not
uncommon to see those things trade at 5%

89
00:04:42,319 --> 00:04:44,560
discount, so 95¢ on the dollar.

90
00:04:44,560 --> 00:04:46,900
I mean, I was just talking to a broker Tuesday.

91
00:04:47,040 --> 00:04:53,555
The competition you see in the big broker
trades for the buyout stuff is 5 to 15%

92
00:04:53,694 --> 00:04:56,894
discount, where venture is still 25 to 35.

93
00:04:56,894 --> 00:05:00,334
And they're still I mean, venture is more risky
inherently and

94
00:05:00,495 --> 00:05:03,055
And the marks might not be as accurate,
correct?

95
00:05:03,055 --> 00:05:03,214
So

96
00:05:03,214 --> 00:05:04,095
we're a fund of funds.

97
00:05:04,095 --> 00:05:06,115
We're invested in 100 managers.

98
00:05:06,254 --> 00:05:10,000
We have 450 active underlying funds on our
platform.

99
00:05:10,060 --> 00:05:11,420
So, we actually track this stat.

100
00:05:11,420 --> 00:05:16,699
And it's one of the most asked for things from
our managers of like, Hey, can you blind my

101
00:05:16,699 --> 00:05:21,375
book and just say relative to all the other
managers who have an investment in our

102
00:05:21,375 --> 00:05:23,214
underlying companies, like, where do I sit?

103
00:05:23,214 --> 00:05:26,975
And there's a couple outliers for sure, every
time you look at those.

104
00:05:26,975 --> 00:05:31,774
And, like, you know, one manager maybe has more
confidence in the company than another,

105
00:05:31,774 --> 00:05:32,175
etcetera.

106
00:05:32,175 --> 00:05:35,389
But for the most part, people are pretty close
these days.

107
00:05:35,389 --> 00:05:39,470
Or we know that some firms just inherently
don't care and they won't mark their book up,

108
00:05:39,470 --> 00:05:42,670
no matter what the operating metrics are, from
last round price.

109
00:05:42,670 --> 00:05:45,949
And they just leave it there until, I mean, the
company goes public.

110
00:05:45,949 --> 00:05:48,530
You're in 450 funds, 100 managers.

111
00:05:49,285 --> 00:05:53,925
When you're looking at a new manager, are you
thinking about how is this, has a diverse set

112
00:05:53,925 --> 00:05:57,625
of assets or are you just looking for pure
alpha who could make the best decisions?

113
00:05:57,685 --> 00:06:04,665
We only add 2 to 3 new managers in our,
probably, core portfolio every 2 to 3 years.

114
00:06:04,800 --> 00:06:07,839
So, there's not a lot of, rotation in our book.

115
00:06:07,839 --> 00:06:11,459
And a lot of it's because people perform well
and they stay.

116
00:06:13,120 --> 00:06:18,720
And so, like, when I'm adding a new manager, I
mean, I have to think about how is that

117
00:06:18,720 --> 00:06:23,754
different from what I already have because I'm
kind of assuming, luckily, fortunately, for a

118
00:06:23,754 --> 00:06:27,754
young guy to to join a Fund A Fund platform,
that we have access to some of the best venture

119
00:06:27,754 --> 00:06:29,514
capitalists in the world already today.

120
00:06:29,514 --> 00:06:32,875
And so what's gonna be different and new, and
how does that fit into my book?

121
00:06:32,875 --> 00:06:39,439
Are you somehow looking at their assets versus
other assets, like whether they're doing SaaS

122
00:06:39,439 --> 00:06:42,000
and consumer and you have too much exposure to
SaaS or consumer?

123
00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:42,240
How do you

124
00:06:42,319 --> 00:06:45,279
Say we missed a big winner in our portfolio.

125
00:06:45,279 --> 00:06:48,705
Like, say we weren't in Uber indirectly, and we
had some.

126
00:06:49,264 --> 00:06:53,845
But, like, say we weren't, and there are a
bunch of spinouts coming from those companies,

127
00:06:53,985 --> 00:06:58,785
and some other VCs are just capitalized on that
talent because, let's face it, the dirty little

128
00:06:58,785 --> 00:07:04,019
secret about your capital is that, yeah, you
want all the best talent to stay and help grow

129
00:07:04,019 --> 00:07:07,319
a growth stage company, but those make some of
the best founders.

130
00:07:08,019 --> 00:07:11,060
And so, like, people aggressively target that
talent.

131
00:07:11,060 --> 00:07:15,295
We look periodically of like, hey, which
companies are we missing in recent kind of

132
00:07:15,295 --> 00:07:18,654
vintages and who are the VCs that are
capitalizing on that?

133
00:07:18,654 --> 00:07:20,495
And then we'll go try to get in front of them.

134
00:07:20,495 --> 00:07:26,574
Sometimes it's an early product person who got
into venture and is on their Fund 2 or Fund 3

135
00:07:26,574 --> 00:07:31,430
and has examples of this sort of thing, or it
is the VC who did that deal doubling down on

136
00:07:31,430 --> 00:07:31,990
the winners.

137
00:07:31,990 --> 00:07:36,389
Intuitively, it would appear you would think
that serial entrepreneurs have a leg up to

138
00:07:36,389 --> 00:07:40,790
these kind of former employee number 5 at Uber,
Tutan AI.

139
00:07:40,790 --> 00:07:44,615
But to your point, a lot of the big winners end
up being from these ecosystems.

140
00:07:44,675 --> 00:07:45,794
Why do you think that is?

141
00:07:45,794 --> 00:07:48,055
Solid is just building an early team.

142
00:07:48,194 --> 00:07:53,894
Like, if you can go start a company with 3 of
your buddies who you know are ex web operators

143
00:07:54,115 --> 00:07:59,009
and are in the trenches and frankly hungry,
like, they're not already wealthy, but they

144
00:07:59,009 --> 00:08:01,810
want to go change the world and be a part of
the next big thing.

145
00:08:01,810 --> 00:08:06,610
Like, that makes that initial 5 person team all
the more dangerous in our eyes.

146
00:08:06,610 --> 00:08:08,689
It derisks it and also sets the culture.

147
00:08:08,689 --> 00:08:08,930
Yeah.

148
00:08:08,930 --> 00:08:14,125
There's a corollary where David Sacks, the
first, like, 30 angel investments were just

149
00:08:14,125 --> 00:08:14,625
friends.

150
00:08:14,685 --> 00:08:16,524
He knew that people completely deristed.

151
00:08:16,524 --> 00:08:19,205
He has one of the best kind of angel track
records because

152
00:08:19,205 --> 00:08:22,044
he has one of the most angel track records in
the world.

153
00:08:22,044 --> 00:08:22,544
Yeah.

154
00:08:22,764 --> 00:08:23,564
You you sound like

155
00:08:23,564 --> 00:08:24,204
you know more about it.

156
00:08:24,204 --> 00:08:26,750
Well, he he he he he he's a Fund 1.

157
00:08:26,910 --> 00:08:29,710
So him and Bill coming together and launching
that.

158
00:08:29,710 --> 00:08:32,429
Like, I I hope, David and Bill are fine.

159
00:08:32,429 --> 00:08:32,910
That's good.

160
00:08:32,910 --> 00:08:34,610
My sword my sword is amazing.

161
00:08:34,830 --> 00:08:35,149
Yeah.

162
00:08:35,149 --> 00:08:36,669
And and a lot of fun to be a part of.

163
00:08:36,669 --> 00:08:38,144
You do invest in Fund 1s.

164
00:08:38,144 --> 00:08:40,945
So tell me about, well, when would you back a
Fund 1?

165
00:08:40,945 --> 00:08:46,225
So emerging manager, I kind of, like, said in
almost, like, air quotes earlier.

166
00:08:46,225 --> 00:08:51,090
So we don't internally think of us backing
emerging managers.

167
00:08:51,090 --> 00:08:55,490
Like, it's just too hard for for our platform
to really get excited about folks who don't

168
00:08:55,490 --> 00:08:56,450
really have a track record.

169
00:08:56,450 --> 00:08:59,410
I mean, you're being compared against Index and
Excel.

170
00:08:59,410 --> 00:09:02,129
And it's like, well, why, you know, why do you
deserve to win?

171
00:09:02,129 --> 00:09:03,990
And, like, what's your spot in the market?

172
00:09:04,085 --> 00:09:08,884
And so when we talk about backing of Fund 1,
it's usually someone like a David Sachs who has

173
00:09:08,884 --> 00:09:14,404
an amazing track record, wants to
institutionalize, either as family office,

174
00:09:14,404 --> 00:09:18,759
private activity, and, like, hey, he's all in
on being a venture capitalist now, or it's

175
00:09:18,759 --> 00:09:24,839
someone who has left one of the big brand firms
who, is going to, you know, generally, they

176
00:09:24,839 --> 00:09:29,559
talk about just not wanting to deal with, like,
the scope of a platform and want to really

177
00:09:29,559 --> 00:09:35,815
focus on either one sector or one stage, not
worry about the later stage follow on activity,

178
00:09:35,815 --> 00:09:36,215
etcetera.

179
00:09:36,215 --> 00:09:39,415
Like, we see that a lot, and we'll back those
sorts of managers.

180
00:09:39,415 --> 00:09:42,634
So, for example, we backed Tomas at Airheory.

181
00:09:42,774 --> 00:09:43,975
We were in FundOne there.

182
00:09:43,975 --> 00:09:47,379
We did West Chan at FPV, folks like that, when
they spin out.

183
00:09:47,379 --> 00:09:51,379
And they're just fantastic investors that we
know we want to be a part of.

184
00:09:51,379 --> 00:09:54,340
Just to play devil's advocate, there's
certainly persistence in venture capital

185
00:09:54,340 --> 00:09:56,179
returns, and you're in a lot of great funds.

186
00:09:56,179 --> 00:09:59,299
But can you really just go to these funds and
continuously upside?

187
00:09:59,299 --> 00:10:01,904
Aren't you basically capped in your top name?

188
00:10:01,904 --> 00:10:06,225
So, our Fund of Funds, like 70% of our
underlying dollars, if you look at it on a

189
00:10:06,225 --> 00:10:10,085
strategy basis, go into seed or Series A
focused strategies.

190
00:10:10,545 --> 00:10:16,320
And so, as platforms have raised AUM, and most
of that AUM growth has been on later stage and

191
00:10:16,320 --> 00:10:20,639
follow on activity like, if we scaled with a
bunch of those groups, like, our product mix

192
00:10:20,639 --> 00:10:23,299
would effectively change for our clients, our
LPs.

193
00:10:23,440 --> 00:10:25,080
And so we worry about that a lot.

194
00:10:25,080 --> 00:10:28,944
You know, at a certain point, our clients can
go and buy those platforms directly, and we're

195
00:10:28,944 --> 00:10:30,225
happy to make those introductions.

196
00:10:30,225 --> 00:10:34,324
And maybe they should, but then maybe it's not
a fit for us anymore.

197
00:10:34,464 --> 00:10:38,944
And so our, you know, our kind of core fund of
funds has actually stayed pretty consistent in

198
00:10:38,944 --> 00:10:41,345
size for the last 10 years sort of thing.

199
00:10:41,345 --> 00:10:45,870
And so you'd see $20,000,000 to $30,000,000
commitments in there across the platform.

200
00:10:46,330 --> 00:10:51,529
And then excess capacity goes to one of our
separately managed accounts that sits as an

201
00:10:51,529 --> 00:10:56,570
overflow vehicle on top of our stuff who would
like more of that type of investment.

202
00:10:56,570 --> 00:10:57,789
You mentioned your clients.

203
00:10:57,965 --> 00:11:00,524
Who are clients that invest into venture fund
of funds?

204
00:11:00,524 --> 00:11:01,904
What are some of those categories?

205
00:11:02,044 --> 00:11:03,644
Couple categories for us.

206
00:11:03,644 --> 00:11:08,785
I mean, we are almost exclusively large pension
retirement systems globally.

207
00:11:09,085 --> 00:11:15,839
Half our money comes from US and then the other
half internationally, so Germany, South Korea,

208
00:11:15,980 --> 00:11:16,459
Japan.

209
00:11:16,459 --> 00:11:21,659
So, folks like that who think of us as venture
experts who will help them manage their venture

210
00:11:21,659 --> 00:11:22,159
allocation.

211
00:11:22,220 --> 00:11:23,579
And so those are the large checks.

212
00:11:23,579 --> 00:11:26,399
And so then they're just like, Hey, here's our
venture allocation.

213
00:11:26,745 --> 00:11:32,024
We might hire 2 venture fund to funds, and you
guys go figure it out and get me into the best

214
00:11:32,024 --> 00:11:32,524
managers.

215
00:11:33,144 --> 00:11:37,164
And then there's a cohort of LP that wants us
to help with access.

216
00:11:37,464 --> 00:11:42,950
And since our founding of our firm, we always
have inherent churn in our LP base because it's

217
00:11:42,950 --> 00:11:43,990
part of our business model.

218
00:11:43,990 --> 00:11:48,549
So they'll give us a primary commitment, and
we'll help it for maybe, like, 2 funds in a

219
00:11:48,549 --> 00:11:49,029
row.

220
00:11:49,029 --> 00:11:51,610
And then we'll help them with introductions to
managers.

221
00:11:52,629 --> 00:11:55,129
And it's always up to the manager to let them
in, certainly.

222
00:11:55,269 --> 00:11:59,144
But, and we don't make a lot of promises there
because it just it is what it is.

223
00:11:59,204 --> 00:12:04,725
But, you know, the reality is, is it's worked
and people take their money, and it's a way to

224
00:12:04,725 --> 00:12:09,125
get smart on the space and then eventually
build out their their program directly.

225
00:12:09,125 --> 00:12:10,356
And we're totally happy to do that.

226
00:12:10,356 --> 00:12:10,725
Those family offices, endowment?

227
00:12:10,725 --> 00:12:13,259
And Those family offices, endowments?

228
00:12:13,259 --> 00:12:20,460
Smaller endowments or maybe, some international
funds that know they don't have access in the

229
00:12:20,460 --> 00:12:24,220
US and they want it, we're happy to help them
get up to speed.

230
00:12:24,220 --> 00:12:28,715
Maybe kind of to the way we start up, the feet
on the street and know the market.

231
00:12:29,095 --> 00:12:33,014
Like, they're willing to pay someone to help
them figure it out.

232
00:12:33,014 --> 00:12:36,795
You mentioned when we last shot you that you
don't chase sector funds.

233
00:12:36,855 --> 00:12:43,029
For us, and this is a house view, it's that we
kind of view venture and innovation as people

234
00:12:43,089 --> 00:12:45,589
finding opportunities at the fringes.

235
00:12:45,889 --> 00:12:51,089
Maybe it's where 2 sectors collide, and then
bam, you have a new business model or a new

236
00:12:51,089 --> 00:12:52,450
method distribution, etcetera.

237
00:12:52,450 --> 00:12:53,829
And those are the big wins.

238
00:12:54,075 --> 00:12:59,514
And so, as we think about sectors, it's really
hard for us to not imagine that the generalist

239
00:12:59,514 --> 00:13:05,514
VCs wouldn't end up in some of the most
interesting collisions of sectors and finding

240
00:13:05,514 --> 00:13:09,709
the coolest opportunities because they're just
good FEC and they know a lot of people who've

241
00:13:09,709 --> 00:13:10,370
been successful.

242
00:13:10,669 --> 00:13:16,990
I will caveat that with saying we do have
really 2 sectors on our platform that we will

243
00:13:16,990 --> 00:13:18,909
invest in or are investing in today.

244
00:13:18,909 --> 00:13:19,889
1 is biotech.

245
00:13:20,644 --> 00:13:23,785
And that's like 10%, 15% of our book.

246
00:13:24,004 --> 00:13:26,264
And then the other is cybersecurity.

247
00:13:26,644 --> 00:13:31,365
The way we've kind of gotten there is that we
think you kind of need some of the gray hair in

248
00:13:31,365 --> 00:13:35,059
the room when you're talking to, like, the
customers of those 2 businesses.

249
00:13:35,059 --> 00:13:40,179
Like, big pharma is not gonna just, like, pick
up the phone to any VC who invests in biotech

250
00:13:40,179 --> 00:13:40,659
companies.

251
00:13:40,659 --> 00:13:44,820
Like, you need to have some gravitas to get in
front of the decision makers there.

252
00:13:44,820 --> 00:13:45,914
It's just the truth.

253
00:13:45,914 --> 00:13:50,654
And cybersecurity, we knew where for us that
it's a sector biotech goes back to, like, 99

254
00:13:50,715 --> 00:13:53,195
being, you know, about 15% of the book.

255
00:13:53,195 --> 00:13:57,274
But but recently, we kind of came to a
conclusion that cybersecurity, you need that

256
00:13:57,274 --> 00:14:03,029
same I'm using the term gravitas to get in
front of CSOs and and the importance of

257
00:14:03,029 --> 00:14:06,649
decision makers who can really move the needle
for early stage company.

258
00:14:06,789 --> 00:14:07,269
Hey.

259
00:14:07,269 --> 00:14:09,529
We'll be right back after a word from our
sponsor.

260
00:14:10,164 --> 00:14:14,485
Our sponsor for today's episode is Carta, the
end to end accounting platform purposely built

261
00:14:14,485 --> 00:14:15,465
for fund CFOs.

262
00:14:16,004 --> 00:14:20,345
For the first time ever, private fund operators
can leverage their very own bespoke software

263
00:14:20,485 --> 00:14:23,705
that's designed from the ground up to bring
their whole portfolio together.

264
00:14:24,129 --> 00:14:28,709
This enables formations, transactions, and
distributions to flow seamlessly and accurately

265
00:14:28,929 --> 00:14:29,909
to limited partners.

266
00:14:30,449 --> 00:14:34,850
The end result is a remarkably fast and precise
platform that empowers better strategic

267
00:14:34,850 --> 00:14:38,789
decision making and delivers transformational
insights on demand.

268
00:14:39,404 --> 00:14:42,625
Come see the new standard in private fund
management atz.carta.comforward/10xpod.

269
00:14:45,325 --> 00:14:46,144
That's z.carta.comforward/10xpod.

270
00:14:48,284 --> 00:14:50,705
So we chatted last time about the pros and
cons.

271
00:14:51,240 --> 00:14:55,000
When you're in a situation where you have one
more vintage where you think that the fund

272
00:14:55,000 --> 00:14:58,679
could really deliver very well, would you
invest knowing that it's a one and done?

273
00:14:58,679 --> 00:15:00,039
And we're already existing LPs?

274
00:15:00,039 --> 00:15:00,759
You're not existing.

275
00:15:00,759 --> 00:15:01,799
They're probably unlikely.

276
00:15:01,799 --> 00:15:06,325
Reality is we have to monitor these funds for
15, 18 years anyways.

277
00:15:06,325 --> 00:15:12,325
And I mean, if I can't hand over my heart, say
that I think I can get 2 to 3 commitment cycles

278
00:15:12,325 --> 00:15:14,985
with a manager, like, we're just not adding a
new relationship.

279
00:15:15,125 --> 00:15:18,584
So how often do you not commit to the 2nd or
3rd vintage?

280
00:15:18,679 --> 00:15:22,679
I could count on one hand in, like, the 8 and a
half ish years that have been near.

281
00:15:22,679 --> 00:15:23,879
How many times it's happened?

282
00:15:23,879 --> 00:15:27,399
And that's been due to something that
specifically happened, or what are those cases?

283
00:15:27,399 --> 00:15:27,639
Yeah.

284
00:15:27,639 --> 00:15:30,919
I mean, a lot of it is just changing strategy
to something.

285
00:15:30,919 --> 00:15:34,725
If you started a seed fund and you raised
what's up to 150 and then, like, you come back

286
00:15:34,725 --> 00:15:40,565
and had great success and you're raising at 450
and you want to go be multistage, like, we

287
00:15:40,565 --> 00:15:42,745
might have a pause at that one.

288
00:15:43,365 --> 00:15:45,704
I would say the number 2 reason would be team.

289
00:15:45,924 --> 00:15:51,839
I mean, certainly, if there's a bunch of team
turnover and, it's just not the same story and

290
00:15:51,839 --> 00:15:55,779
pitch, like, that's hard to get behind because
it's such a personal business.

291
00:15:55,839 --> 00:15:59,120
What are some other reasons that venture
franchises decline over time?

292
00:15:59,120 --> 00:16:03,524
I mean, just senior partners who have made a
lot of money and are really doing the deals.

293
00:16:03,745 --> 00:16:08,865
And it's just a bunch of junior folks who don't
know how to make money in the business of

294
00:16:08,865 --> 00:16:11,024
venture capital, that give the keys to the car.

295
00:16:11,024 --> 00:16:15,440
Do you believe venture could function out of
office, or do you think that you have to be in

296
00:16:15,440 --> 00:16:17,200
office to be a good venture firm today?

297
00:16:17,200 --> 00:16:21,379
Now, I do think fundraising would be really
tough.

298
00:16:21,679 --> 00:16:23,519
And just there's a trust element to it.

299
00:16:23,519 --> 00:16:27,245
I mean, so, like, yeah, I do pitch your
strategy totally great.

300
00:16:27,625 --> 00:16:28,424
I understand it.

301
00:16:28,424 --> 00:16:29,865
It's in the meeting now, and I get it.

302
00:16:29,865 --> 00:16:34,184
But there's just something about breaking bread
with somebody and sitting down and and having

303
00:16:34,184 --> 00:16:41,304
an in person conversation that I just don't
think changes, that quickly in in this business

304
00:16:41,304 --> 00:16:46,529
because there's such an opportunity cost for
making the wrong decision here.

305
00:16:46,529 --> 00:16:52,290
Like, if you are one of the big platforms and
you invest in what you you know, you invest in,

306
00:16:52,290 --> 00:16:57,075
like, the number 5 winner versus the number 1
or 2 winner in the category, like, let's just

307
00:16:57,235 --> 00:17:00,754
and then you can't invest in the number 1 or 2
because you're conflicted, whatever.

308
00:17:00,754 --> 00:17:06,195
Like, I just don't think people are going to be
so willing to take it only on Zoom.

309
00:17:06,195 --> 00:17:10,674
Just to play devil's advocate, I do think in
person as well, I think venture more than

310
00:17:10,674 --> 00:17:14,789
anything, and like many asset management
fields, is an apprenticeship model.

311
00:17:14,849 --> 00:17:15,349
Sure.

312
00:17:15,490 --> 00:17:19,170
And you just imagine, you know, you have a
carpenter and they're doing it virtually.

313
00:17:19,170 --> 00:17:20,049
It's very difficult.

314
00:17:20,049 --> 00:17:21,569
Obviously, that's a very physical thing.

315
00:17:21,569 --> 00:17:26,445
But I think some of the greatest venture
managers, the next generation, tend to be from

316
00:17:26,445 --> 00:17:27,485
in office cultures.

317
00:17:27,485 --> 00:17:28,924
There's a lot of truth to what you're saying.

318
00:17:28,924 --> 00:17:30,365
And I mean, top tier.

319
00:17:30,365 --> 00:17:30,924
That's what I'm saying.

320
00:17:30,924 --> 00:17:31,725
You can do it remote.

321
00:17:31,725 --> 00:17:35,965
Like, we still work 2 days in the office, and
we actually we hire kids out of college every

322
00:17:35,965 --> 00:17:36,525
couple of years.

323
00:17:36,525 --> 00:17:38,125
That's how I lucked into it.

324
00:17:38,125 --> 00:17:38,525
Yeah.

325
00:17:38,525 --> 00:17:42,200
And for the first year, like, you don't get to
go to a lot of conferences.

326
00:17:42,420 --> 00:17:43,059
Like, you don't.

327
00:17:43,059 --> 00:17:47,640
Like, your job is to learn the book, which, I
mean, we have a lot of active portfolio

328
00:17:47,700 --> 00:17:48,200
companies

329
00:17:48,259 --> 00:17:48,380
and

330
00:17:48,380 --> 00:17:50,920
a lot of active managers, so that's a tall
task.

331
00:17:50,980 --> 00:17:54,660
I'd love to see if any of our analysts right
now could could talk to our entire book.

332
00:17:54,660 --> 00:18:00,424
But, until you're shooting an LP and until you
know enough to be dangerous and probably this

333
00:18:00,424 --> 00:18:05,224
is true for a lot of VCs like, you probably
really shouldn't be representing your firm.

334
00:18:05,224 --> 00:18:10,099
Like, you manage people's retirement money and,
like, that reputation has built over years.

335
00:18:10,099 --> 00:18:15,619
And so until, like, our junior people can kind
of talk the talk, and we know we're gonna have

336
00:18:15,619 --> 00:18:18,099
a good answer for like, Hey, what's an LP look
for?

337
00:18:18,099 --> 00:18:21,640
Like, what are the things with my venture funds
I should be thinking about?

338
00:18:21,724 --> 00:18:24,845
Like, until you can prove that, like, you know,
we're not sure.

339
00:18:24,845 --> 00:18:26,625
You're in 450 funds.

340
00:18:27,164 --> 00:18:29,025
I'm assuming you don't know all 10,000.

341
00:18:29,244 --> 00:18:31,964
I know you're very smart, but probably there's
limitations set to it.

342
00:18:31,964 --> 00:18:32,525
Oh, totally.

343
00:18:32,525 --> 00:18:34,285
So how do you talk about your book?

344
00:18:34,285 --> 00:18:38,670
And how do you talk about top tier when you
talk to LPs or at conferences?

345
00:18:39,130 --> 00:18:44,190
We have a standing thing that we get together
as an investment team and we review quarterly

346
00:18:44,250 --> 00:18:45,289
new deal activity.

347
00:18:45,289 --> 00:18:47,210
And so it'd be like, how many companies?

348
00:18:47,210 --> 00:18:48,109
At what stages?

349
00:18:48,170 --> 00:18:49,529
What was the average check size?

350
00:18:49,529 --> 00:18:53,585
Like, the managers who do provide ownership
percents, like, how does that tick up and down?

351
00:18:53,585 --> 00:18:54,884
And this is kind of a scoreboard.

352
00:18:54,944 --> 00:18:56,464
What are some of the things you're tracking
there?

353
00:18:56,464 --> 00:18:56,704
Yeah.

354
00:18:56,704 --> 00:19:00,944
Average entry price, ownership percent, size of
rounds.

355
00:19:00,944 --> 00:19:08,339
Maybe if you'd be curious, qq123 versus Q1
'twenty 4 is actually about the same invested

356
00:19:08,339 --> 00:19:11,000
capital on, like, a look through basis of our
managers.

357
00:19:11,539 --> 00:19:16,660
But if you look this year, there was more of a
shift to, seed and Series A stage.

358
00:19:16,900 --> 00:19:21,984
So the number of investments was higher, which,
like, for us is a good early indicator that the

359
00:19:21,984 --> 00:19:26,784
venture industry is, like, really kind of like,
at least with, like, you know, premier venture

360
00:19:26,784 --> 00:19:31,200
managers, which maybe I'm saying irregently,
but, you know, those top tier.

361
00:19:31,279 --> 00:19:33,359
Those are the top tier, whatever you wanna call
it.

362
00:19:34,079 --> 00:19:37,519
Those those managers are back to the works
writing early stage checks versus trying to

363
00:19:37,519 --> 00:19:43,359
follow on into some of their winners or, you
know, huge, huge sums of capital into, like, a

364
00:19:43,359 --> 00:19:45,039
couple big AI deals last year.

365
00:19:45,039 --> 00:19:48,355
Whereas this year, we saw a lot more kind of
back to basics.

366
00:19:48,575 --> 00:19:53,615
And, I think it bodes well for for the industry
here over the next 18 months that that there's

367
00:19:53,615 --> 00:19:55,214
such a there was such an increase.

368
00:19:55,214 --> 00:19:56,095
You mentioned AI.

369
00:19:56,095 --> 00:20:01,420
Do you have any early views on the ecosystem on
what you see, to your manager?

370
00:20:01,420 --> 00:20:06,539
Well, real revenue pulling through these
businesses, but it's still TBD if that's just

371
00:20:06,539 --> 00:20:09,840
fickle revenue of people just trying to figure
out which tools they want.

372
00:20:10,220 --> 00:20:13,039
It's totally unclear who's going to be category
winners.

373
00:20:13,304 --> 00:20:18,744
It's obvious that there's an enterprise budget
for these corporate tools solving real pain

374
00:20:18,744 --> 00:20:19,224
points.

375
00:20:19,224 --> 00:20:23,304
The problem is when you see 3 companies show up
that are solving the same thing, can our fund

376
00:20:23,304 --> 00:20:23,784
of funds go?

377
00:20:23,784 --> 00:20:25,944
Can I just like, Alright, who's going to win?

378
00:20:25,944 --> 00:20:27,144
All 3 are going to be winners.

379
00:20:27,144 --> 00:20:28,424
It's just the reality of the business.

380
00:20:28,424 --> 00:20:32,640
You said last time we chatted, our clients hire
us because we have people that will tell us the

381
00:20:32,640 --> 00:20:33,039
truth.

382
00:20:33,039 --> 00:20:34,240
Maybe feet on the street.

383
00:20:34,240 --> 00:20:35,119
We'll go back to that.

384
00:20:35,119 --> 00:20:39,140
But, references are such important.

385
00:20:39,200 --> 00:20:43,600
If you listen to any LP talk about investing in
venture, I mean, they talk about how important

386
00:20:43,600 --> 00:20:44,714
references are.

387
00:20:44,794 --> 00:20:50,634
Well, like, if I was starting a Fund of Funds
today and was just like cold start, like, I'm

388
00:20:50,634 --> 00:20:54,954
going to go get into the best venture managers,
like, every venture pitch you get is pretty

389
00:20:54,954 --> 00:20:56,255
exciting and interesting.

390
00:20:56,394 --> 00:20:58,794
Like, no one boring really starts a venture
fund.

391
00:20:58,794 --> 00:21:00,450
It's the top five percent of society.

392
00:21:00,450 --> 00:21:02,329
The risk manager is the top 5.

393
00:21:02,329 --> 00:21:04,490
They're just really smart, interesting people.

394
00:21:04,970 --> 00:21:08,809
And I think you could get caught up and just
like, Man, this is obvious.

395
00:21:08,809 --> 00:21:10,109
This is going to be a winner.

396
00:21:10,250 --> 00:21:12,569
And we talked to all our junior people about
this.

397
00:21:12,569 --> 00:21:14,509
Like, totally and I have the same experience.

398
00:21:14,704 --> 00:21:17,825
The funds that I thought day 1 were, like,
super interesting.

399
00:21:17,825 --> 00:21:18,625
Obviously great.

400
00:21:18,625 --> 00:21:19,664
We're like, Yeah, that's cool.

401
00:21:19,664 --> 00:21:23,345
But, like, wait until you meet all of our
managers who come through our office, and I

402
00:21:23,345 --> 00:21:26,865
think you'll understand why our book looks the
way it does.

403
00:21:26,865 --> 00:21:30,599
And, like, that then is the bar that you have
to compare new relationships to.

404
00:21:30,759 --> 00:21:35,079
And then those are the people that I get to
call to tell me the truth about the other

405
00:21:35,079 --> 00:21:36,380
managers and their ecosystem.

406
00:21:36,599 --> 00:21:40,839
And, like, Hey, is that seed manager really
getting into all these deals?

407
00:21:40,839 --> 00:21:43,720
They're getting into your shittiest 20% of
deals.

408
00:21:43,720 --> 00:21:43,880
Yeah.

409
00:21:43,880 --> 00:21:45,400
They're just scraping the bottom of your phone.

410
00:21:45,400 --> 00:21:46,575
Those people tell us the truth.

411
00:21:47,054 --> 00:21:49,855
And I mean, they're friends of the firm over
time.

412
00:21:49,855 --> 00:21:50,355
Absolutely.

413
00:21:50,494 --> 00:21:54,494
And we we look to, to help us continue to make
money.

414
00:21:54,494 --> 00:21:58,815
In terms of your relationship with these top
funds outside of being an LP, what care do you

415
00:21:58,815 --> 00:22:01,634
have to give them to kind of maintain and
strengthen their relationship?

416
00:22:01,774 --> 00:22:05,609
I hope people view us as knowing what we're
talking about.

417
00:22:05,609 --> 00:22:09,929
When you sit down with somebody on top tier,
like, with the access to the data that we have,

418
00:22:09,929 --> 00:22:14,089
like, what I hope and what the firm spends a
lot of time thinking about is, like, being a

419
00:22:14,089 --> 00:22:15,525
trusted partner for them.

420
00:22:15,765 --> 00:22:17,945
And the money's next, right?

421
00:22:18,005 --> 00:22:21,045
Everybody's nice to LPs, totally.

422
00:22:21,045 --> 00:22:21,285
Yeah.

423
00:22:21,285 --> 00:22:26,825
I mean, the ability to run LPACs for 2 thirds
of our managers and stuff like that.

424
00:22:27,125 --> 00:22:30,539
We just can sit down and be like, Hey, that's
market, or like, Yeah, you guys actually are

425
00:22:30,539 --> 00:22:32,619
doing a great job, or You're light on DPI.

426
00:22:32,619 --> 00:22:34,240
I'm like, We're just going to tell you the
truth.

427
00:22:34,539 --> 00:22:36,299
And I think people respect that.

428
00:22:36,299 --> 00:22:37,340
I hope people respect that.

429
00:22:37,340 --> 00:22:41,340
Do you find out the people that are most open
to feedback, your top managers somewhere in the

430
00:22:41,340 --> 00:22:43,494
middle, or talk to me about the correlation
between

431
00:22:43,575 --> 00:22:45,015
VC is super curious.

432
00:22:45,015 --> 00:22:50,295
People like, as soon as they know we have some
benchmark thing that, like, will come up in a

433
00:22:50,295 --> 00:22:52,934
meeting, they always want to see it.

434
00:22:52,934 --> 00:22:56,455
Like, they always want to to figure out where
they stack.

435
00:22:56,455 --> 00:22:59,430
So you lead with data, not not with ego,
essentially.

436
00:22:59,809 --> 00:23:03,750
Most of the firms we invest in are not like,
again, first time managers, whatever.

437
00:23:03,809 --> 00:23:06,870
We're happy to help on operational stuff, all
that.

438
00:23:07,250 --> 00:23:09,650
But, like, we've kind of got that figured out
at this point.

439
00:23:09,650 --> 00:23:13,634
It's like, how do you tweak things at the
fringes to to win?

440
00:23:13,634 --> 00:23:18,595
And so, like, the scout programs, I don't know,
what, 8 years ago when everybody was doing

441
00:23:18,595 --> 00:23:19,394
that, it was, like, okay.

442
00:23:19,394 --> 00:23:20,595
Like, what's best in class?

443
00:23:20,595 --> 00:23:21,954
Like, how do I go keep up?

444
00:23:21,954 --> 00:23:23,174
Was that a failed experiment?

445
00:23:23,315 --> 00:23:26,375
Honestly, some of those, like, buckets have
performed well.

446
00:23:26,809 --> 00:23:29,529
But I don't know, and I'd love to see the data
on this.

447
00:23:29,529 --> 00:23:32,890
We should probably I should talk to some other
fund of funds and, like, we should figure it

448
00:23:32,890 --> 00:23:33,049
out.

449
00:23:33,049 --> 00:23:40,109
But, like, I would love to see the success rate
of the VCs doubling down on the winners from

450
00:23:40,250 --> 00:23:41,390
their scalp portfolio.

451
00:23:41,845 --> 00:23:47,684
Because there's, I mean, many portfolios of 100
of companies sometimes, and really hard to

452
00:23:47,684 --> 00:23:50,005
figure out which ones are working so early on.

453
00:23:50,005 --> 00:23:56,549
And then how do you go from your 150 ks check
by your operator that you gave money to to MS's

454
00:23:56,610 --> 00:24:00,789
company, is really the one that I should go and
back up the truck and put $4,000,000

455
00:24:01,730 --> 00:24:03,730
superseding or whatever you want to call it.

456
00:24:03,730 --> 00:24:07,570
Are you not concerned that you guys are in
market beta given you're in 10,000 companies?

457
00:24:07,570 --> 00:24:08,984
And how do you assess that out?

458
00:24:09,065 --> 00:24:09,224
Yeah.

459
00:24:09,224 --> 00:24:12,105
I mean, that's worry, sure, with the fund of
funds.

460
00:24:12,105 --> 00:24:18,125
I mean, we try to benchmark ourselves against
the Cambridge USBC benchmark.

461
00:24:18,184 --> 00:24:21,325
Fund of funds and secondary benchmarks are a
little wacky because it's together.

462
00:24:21,849 --> 00:24:22,490
So, yeah.

463
00:24:22,490 --> 00:24:25,929
But most fund of funds, actually, I mean, I've
seen some of the numbers, and a lot of them are

464
00:24:25,929 --> 00:24:26,329
public.

465
00:24:26,329 --> 00:24:28,329
Like, they've done pretty well relative to the
market.

466
00:24:28,329 --> 00:24:29,130
Why do you think that is?

467
00:24:29,130 --> 00:24:34,649
I mean, access, the best name, persistence is
certainly, I mean, statistically, does exist in

468
00:24:34,649 --> 00:24:35,309
our industry.

469
00:24:35,450 --> 00:24:35,950
Sure.

470
00:24:37,654 --> 00:24:42,214
Willingness to probably take a little more
risk, than other folks in the asset class as

471
00:24:42,214 --> 00:24:42,535
well.

472
00:24:42,535 --> 00:24:46,054
I mean, it's you know, I have a $50,000,000
minimum check size.

473
00:24:46,054 --> 00:24:49,734
Like, I'm limited, on the new I can go for.

474
00:24:49,734 --> 00:24:54,390
And that's probably maybe a platform where I'm
a little more later stage focused, and it's,

475
00:24:54,390 --> 00:24:55,849
like, kind of an obvious buy.

476
00:24:56,789 --> 00:24:59,750
That that certainly I'm saying all those about
platforms.

477
00:24:59,750 --> 00:25:01,529
Some of the platforms are our best performers.

478
00:25:01,670 --> 00:25:04,970
So, like, I I don't want to get that loss in
the conversation.

479
00:25:05,029 --> 00:25:05,269
Yeah.

480
00:25:05,269 --> 00:25:06,710
David Clark said the same thing.

481
00:25:06,710 --> 00:25:11,404
He said that David Clark from Bendcap said that
his highest performing fund ever was a growth

482
00:25:11,404 --> 00:25:11,644
fund.

483
00:25:11,644 --> 00:25:12,045
Yeah.

484
00:25:12,045 --> 00:25:12,444
Why not?

485
00:25:12,444 --> 00:25:12,845
What do you

486
00:25:12,845 --> 00:25:18,704
look at the future of fund of funds in your
industry, any new products, any new approaches?

487
00:25:18,845 --> 00:25:19,505
For us,

488
00:25:20,099 --> 00:25:22,259
We went to Europe, which was new.

489
00:25:22,259 --> 00:25:30,179
We spun our European allocation out in 2019,
2020 to sort of like, we've been investing

490
00:25:30,179 --> 00:25:32,119
there since 2004, I think.

491
00:25:32,654 --> 00:25:36,755
And we just saw what was going on in Asia,
probably China specifically.

492
00:25:38,174 --> 00:25:44,575
We just saw the quality of company and even I
mean, our USBC being like, Yeah, we love

493
00:25:44,575 --> 00:25:45,934
investing in European companies.

494
00:25:45,934 --> 00:25:47,795
We can get it for a bit of a discount.

495
00:25:48,019 --> 00:25:51,700
And then they immediately come move to New York
or Silicon Valley.

496
00:25:51,700 --> 00:25:52,819
Like, yeah, why would we not?

497
00:25:52,819 --> 00:25:54,500
They're just really good technical teams.

498
00:25:54,500 --> 00:25:59,299
And then if you look at the underlying data on
the European continent, I mean, the seed and

499
00:25:59,299 --> 00:26:01,779
Series A round, I think it's something I'll
probably misquote it.

500
00:26:01,779 --> 00:26:08,644
Our European team will correct me after this,
but it's, like, 85% of the dollars, done is

501
00:26:08,644 --> 00:26:12,884
from a regional local manager at that, at that
round.

502
00:26:12,884 --> 00:26:16,984
And so if you're thinking of just, like, dollar
cost averaging into a strong tech ecosystem,

503
00:26:17,205 --> 00:26:21,679
like, that's where you wanna be, and the local
guys are just commanding the market.

504
00:26:22,139 --> 00:26:24,539
And the US folks are coming in at the Series B.

505
00:26:24,539 --> 00:26:26,539
So you don't have an existing exposure into it.

506
00:26:26,539 --> 00:26:26,779
Yeah.

507
00:26:26,779 --> 00:26:28,700
And so we're, like, we're getting in at the b.

508
00:26:28,700 --> 00:26:32,625
Like, well, that's cool, but, like, we might as
well go buy it at seed if we can as a fund to

509
00:26:32,625 --> 00:26:33,025
funds.

510
00:26:33,025 --> 00:26:34,985
And so we launched that strategy.

511
00:26:34,985 --> 00:26:40,144
And I mean, some of those firms absolutely
compete on a relative performance basis, like

512
00:26:40,144 --> 00:26:43,365
with a historical track record with our US
relationships.

513
00:26:43,559 --> 00:26:47,259
As a fund to fund, are you able to pursue pure
alpha?

514
00:26:47,400 --> 00:26:53,160
In other words, are you penalized if one of
your funds has a 0.5x if overall you're doing

515
00:26:53,160 --> 00:26:53,559
really well?

516
00:26:53,559 --> 00:26:55,080
And how much is it?

517
00:26:55,080 --> 00:26:55,400
Yeah.

518
00:26:55,400 --> 00:26:59,355
How much risk is it that one of your funds or a
couple of your funds don't perform?

519
00:26:59,434 --> 00:27:04,075
Just like looking at on maybe the other side,
like, it's really hard to pick which of our we

520
00:27:04,075 --> 00:27:09,674
kinda have, like, 25 managers per 5.50,
$600,000,000, on a fund size.

521
00:27:09,674 --> 00:27:10,554
Like, just if you go.

522
00:27:10,554 --> 00:27:15,680
So, like, it's hard to pick on any given fund
which of those 25 is gonna be the huge

523
00:27:15,680 --> 00:27:16,180
outperformer.

524
00:27:16,400 --> 00:27:20,480
And so, like, the opportunity cost is really
like, okay, which one is gonna be the screaming

525
00:27:20,480 --> 00:27:20,960
home run?

526
00:27:20,960 --> 00:27:23,140
And, like, what do you think about portfolio
construction?

527
00:27:23,200 --> 00:27:29,105
Like, I would be I have I would love to ask our
partners and myself, like, if you only have one

528
00:27:29,105 --> 00:27:33,744
fund, and like, it had to be over 3x net, like,
who we hand over your art this cycle would you

529
00:27:33,744 --> 00:27:34,545
put the money in?

530
00:27:34,545 --> 00:27:35,984
Like, that's tough to do.

531
00:27:35,984 --> 00:27:40,500
And so for us, I mean, taking that basket
approach with with the upside opportunity is

532
00:27:40,500 --> 00:27:43,400
probably more how we think about it than
worrying about the downside.

533
00:27:43,460 --> 00:27:45,779
Is there a power lot to investing in funds?

534
00:27:45,779 --> 00:27:47,880
Otherwise, is it right tail skewed?

535
00:27:48,500 --> 00:27:53,160
Or is it about, like, do you expect one of your
funds to return at 10.15x?

536
00:27:53,539 --> 00:27:54,339
Or does that not

537
00:27:54,500 --> 00:27:54,900
No.

538
00:27:54,900 --> 00:27:55,875
I think it happens.

539
00:27:55,954 --> 00:27:56,115
Sure.

540
00:27:56,115 --> 00:27:59,154
Some of the seed funds have like crazy, huge
multiples.

541
00:27:59,154 --> 00:28:00,994
But no, we don't think about it like that.

542
00:28:00,994 --> 00:28:06,355
I mean, if you're a 5x net plus venture fund,
you're crushing it, and you should be really

543
00:28:06,355 --> 00:28:07,335
happy about that.

544
00:28:08,115 --> 00:28:12,430
So the like, just the number of company and we
kind of got on this.

545
00:28:12,430 --> 00:28:18,029
So, like, I think since our 2,008 fund of
funds, we just did this over the summer, since

546
00:28:18,029 --> 00:28:23,150
our 2,008 fund of funds, like, oh, you could
say on average, like, a 1000 to 1200 companies

547
00:28:23,150 --> 00:28:30,664
and each of our fund of funds every couple of
years at scale or at maturity, like 18 to 25

548
00:28:30,804 --> 00:28:33,765
companies, they make up like 2 thirds of the
value.

549
00:28:33,765 --> 00:28:38,484
And then the next tail to get you up to like
90% of value is only like another 100

550
00:28:38,484 --> 00:28:38,984
companies.

551
00:28:39,409 --> 00:28:40,230
And so 10%.

552
00:28:40,369 --> 00:28:41,909
It's like kind of a 10 90%.

553
00:28:41,970 --> 00:28:44,309
The 18 to 25 account for 75%.

554
00:28:44,690 --> 00:28:49,649
And I think 18 to 23, I think was the stat,
account for like 2 thirds of the value.

555
00:28:49,649 --> 00:28:51,190
How does that inform your strategy?

556
00:28:51,329 --> 00:28:55,595
If folks don't have and this is talking about
maybe some of the venture math and, like, how

557
00:28:55,595 --> 00:28:56,875
do you make money in venture?

558
00:28:56,875 --> 00:29:02,255
If a VC can't sit down with me and have a
really clear, like, eyes wide open conversation

559
00:29:02,474 --> 00:29:09,019
of how much you need to own upfront, like, what
the sort of business can I'll just, like, pick

560
00:29:09,019 --> 00:29:10,299
a company and be like, Oh, hey.

561
00:29:10,299 --> 00:29:11,899
Like, you know, this company seems cool.

562
00:29:11,899 --> 00:29:16,000
Like, walk me through how that, like, return
your fund or, like, how that's a substantial

563
00:29:16,059 --> 00:29:16,460
driver.

564
00:29:16,460 --> 00:29:21,044
And so, as you're, like, talking about the
finance side of life, if a VC can't be really

565
00:29:21,044 --> 00:29:23,224
clear, like, Oh, we bought this much upfront.

566
00:29:23,605 --> 00:29:26,244
We think the market is huge, whatever.

567
00:29:26,244 --> 00:29:29,704
And we can scale it to this amount of revenue
and sell it for this return.

568
00:29:29,924 --> 00:29:35,549
And at that exit price with some dilution, I'll
return, you know, a huge portion of my fund.

569
00:29:35,549 --> 00:29:37,089
If not, it'd be a fund return.

570
00:29:37,230 --> 00:29:42,450
If they don't have a strategy and a clarity of
thought of, like, how to capture those winners

571
00:29:42,670 --> 00:29:48,269
and and be really diligent, about that, then I
just I'm not convinced, you know, how to make

572
00:29:48,269 --> 00:29:50,525
money at scale in this entry.

573
00:29:50,525 --> 00:29:55,805
I think it's also, you know, if I was to
advocate on behalf of those managers, I would

574
00:29:55,805 --> 00:29:58,045
say, A, is it's a learnable skill.

575
00:29:58,045 --> 00:29:58,545
Totally.

576
00:29:58,765 --> 00:30:01,484
And, 2, it's because they don't come from the
finance side.

577
00:30:01,484 --> 00:30:02,924
They come from the finance side.

578
00:30:02,924 --> 00:30:03,404
Yes.

579
00:30:03,404 --> 00:30:04,305
Different strengths.

580
00:30:04,849 --> 00:30:05,410
I agree.

581
00:30:05,410 --> 00:30:08,930
What would you like our audience to know about
you, about top tier, and anything else you'd

582
00:30:08,930 --> 00:30:09,890
like to shine a light on?

583
00:30:09,890 --> 00:30:11,970
I'm down here in in New York now.

584
00:30:11,970 --> 00:30:13,410
It's people thank you.

585
00:30:13,410 --> 00:30:13,809
Yeah.

586
00:30:13,809 --> 00:30:19,570
If if, any local managers around, that wanna
meet, happy to, to get to know you over the the

587
00:30:19,570 --> 00:30:20,289
coming months and

588
00:30:20,289 --> 00:30:20,744
all that.

589
00:30:20,825 --> 00:30:21,644
What's your criteria?

590
00:30:21,704 --> 00:30:22,184
Criteria?

591
00:30:22,184 --> 00:30:26,285
I mean, look, like we're probably going to
watch for a fund regardless.

592
00:30:26,424 --> 00:30:28,525
Like, we're just meeting you for the first
time.

593
00:30:28,585 --> 00:30:28,904
Sorry.

594
00:30:28,904 --> 00:30:32,505
It's the reality of it, and the business, the
way the business works.

595
00:30:32,505 --> 00:30:38,929
But interesting people that, like, on average,
are entry point for a group that isn't like a

596
00:30:38,929 --> 00:30:39,970
spinout like Tomas.

597
00:30:39,970 --> 00:30:41,829
And it's fund number 3.

598
00:30:42,849 --> 00:30:44,609
And so we don't have the smallest fund.

599
00:30:44,609 --> 00:30:47,029
We've ever done 50,000,000 in size, roughly.

600
00:30:47,595 --> 00:30:51,835
So, I mean, that's probably the ballpark of
when you become investable for us, but you

601
00:30:51,835 --> 00:30:53,914
should probably meet us when you're raising
your fund too.

602
00:30:53,914 --> 00:30:57,914
How could GPs benefit from meeting you early
and talk to me about building a relationship

603
00:30:57,914 --> 00:30:58,474
with LPs?

604
00:30:58,474 --> 00:31:03,539
Well, I hope people still think of us as groups
that knows what we're talking about, and we're

605
00:31:03,539 --> 00:31:07,220
going to shoot you straight, and we're not
going to just, like, ask a bunch of questions

606
00:31:07,220 --> 00:31:09,700
and just, like, take some notes and say, Hey,
thanks for your time.

607
00:31:09,700 --> 00:31:12,420
We'll probably on the call be like, Yeah, this
is interesting.

608
00:31:12,420 --> 00:31:16,144
Like, you know, this sort of network that
you're talking about, like, you know, a lot of

609
00:31:16,144 --> 00:31:17,184
people say it like that.

610
00:31:17,184 --> 00:31:21,744
What I think is unique and interesting about
you is and we'll try to give that feedback to

611
00:31:21,744 --> 00:31:22,244
people.

612
00:31:22,384 --> 00:31:25,345
Yeah, it's definitely not the way to up to
that.

613
00:31:25,345 --> 00:31:25,505
Yeah.

614
00:31:25,904 --> 00:31:30,849
You know, I think one of the underrated people
talk about pitching, but one of the underrated

615
00:31:30,849 --> 00:31:36,049
things about meeting with with great LPs is
actually evolving your strategy.

616
00:31:36,049 --> 00:31:37,650
You're we we just talked about it.

617
00:31:37,650 --> 00:31:38,130
Yeah.

618
00:31:38,369 --> 00:31:39,429
Portfolio construction.

619
00:31:39,784 --> 00:31:40,265
Right?

620
00:31:40,265 --> 00:31:43,065
You're not born out of the womb knowing
portfolio's construction.

621
00:31:43,065 --> 00:31:44,365
It's a learnable skill.

622
00:31:45,065 --> 00:31:48,845
So by meeting with smart LPs, you could
actually improve your strategy.

623
00:31:49,544 --> 00:31:51,971
It's not just a matter of pitching or
rephrasing and, you know, kind of putting a

624
00:31:51,971 --> 00:31:52,065
lipstick on a pig.

625
00:31:52,065 --> 00:31:52,345
So I think I think that's an underrated part of
of fundraising.

626
00:31:52,345 --> 00:31:52,845
Okay.

627
00:31:53,065 --> 00:31:54,359
I lipstick on a pig.

628
00:31:54,359 --> 00:31:56,940
So I think I think that's an underrated part of
of fundraising.

629
00:31:57,079 --> 00:31:57,579
Agree.

630
00:31:57,799 --> 00:32:01,000
I really appreciate you sitting down and and
chatting.

631
00:32:01,079 --> 00:32:01,480
Person.

632
00:32:01,480 --> 00:32:01,799
Yeah.

633
00:32:01,799 --> 00:32:01,960
Yeah.

634
00:32:01,960 --> 00:32:03,000
It's great to see you.

635
00:32:03,000 --> 00:32:03,240
Okay.

636
00:32:03,240 --> 00:32:03,799
Thanks, Ben.

637
00:32:03,799 --> 00:32:04,279
Thank you.

638
00:32:04,279 --> 00:32:05,339
Thank you for listening.

639
00:32:05,528 --> 00:32:10,328
The 10x Capital podcast now receives more than
a 170,000 downloads per month.

640
00:32:10,328 --> 00:32:13,468
If you are interested in sponsoring, please
email me at david@10xcapital.com.