Leave us a review in the app store!
Nov. 12, 2024

E111: KFF’s (Kaiser Family Foundation) CIO on their $700 Million Venture Capital Edge

E111: KFF’s (Kaiser Family Foundation) CIO on their $700 Million Venture Capital Edge
The player is loading ...

Dean Duchak, Chief Investment Officer at KFF sits down with David Weisburd to discuss the lessons learned from 13 years at KFF, how to create a culture of collaboration in endowments, and Dean’s perspective on diversifying investment strategies.

The 10X Capital Podcast now receives more than 170,000 downloads a month. Are you interested in sponsoring an episode? Please email me at David@10xcapital.com.

SPONSOR:

Carta is the all-in-one suite for private fund operations. Carta’s software-based approach takes fund administration out of the spreadsheet and into the modern age with powerful solutions and intuitive interfaces, all on one platform. Their suite of products and expert services help funds at any stage with up-to-date insights and automated workflows to get them to the next level. Learn more at: https://z.carta.com/10xpod

X / Twitter: @dweisburd (David Weisburd) @KFF (KFF)

LinkedIn:

David Weisburd: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dweisburd/ Dean Duchak: https://www.linkedin.com/in/deanduchak/ KFF: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kfforg/

Links: KFF: https://www.kff.org/

Questions or topics you want us to discuss on The 10X Capital Podcast? Email us at david@10xcapital.com

TIMESTAMPS:

(0:00) Episode Preview (2:41) Diversification and macroeconomic impacts on assets (7:07) Exploring thematic investing strategies (8:29) Sponsor: Carta (9:21) GP relationship-building for macro insights (11:54) Evaluating GP performance versus salesmanship (15:14) Pros and cons of managing a smaller endowment (17:17) Focus on venture capital in private allocation (20:47) The contrarian stance on venture capital liquidity (22:24) Investigating the persistence of venture capital returns (23:58) Asset gathering concerns and tax policy implications (27:22) Strategies for portfolio diversification (29:43) Approaching investments in new asset classes (31:27) KFF's key lessons and insights (33:09) Developing skills for new institutional investors (36:50) Closing remarks
Transcript
1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,080
You guys are a $700,000,000 endowment.

2
00:00:02,080 --> 00:00:06,179
You mentioned that a 100% of your private
allocation is into venture capital.

3
00:00:06,240 --> 00:00:07,200
Tell me about that.

4
00:00:07,200 --> 00:00:11,679
I think it's fairly well known that empirically
venture capital is an asset class where there

5
00:00:11,679 --> 00:00:14,994
is a persistence of returns at least more than
any other asset asset class.

6
00:00:14,994 --> 00:00:19,315
So secondly, if you're able to access that
right tail of managers, the long term

7
00:00:19,315 --> 00:00:20,774
performance is exceptional.

8
00:00:20,835 --> 00:00:24,914
What are some skills and some practices that
somebody should do when they're starting out as

9
00:00:24,914 --> 00:00:25,654
an investor?

10
00:00:25,954 --> 00:00:29,394
The way I did it is I responded to every single
email that that came into my inbox.

11
00:00:29,394 --> 00:00:31,010
I took a lot of meetings.

12
00:00:31,070 --> 00:00:34,030
When I was 1, 2 years in, it was meetings all
the time.

13
00:00:34,030 --> 00:00:37,729
Getting those reps and understanding how
different people present different strategies,

14
00:00:37,950 --> 00:00:41,490
taking the reps just to understand what to look
for, what you like, what you don't.

15
00:00:41,549 --> 00:00:45,254
Asking questions, I think that's another thing
that, of course, was always an interesting

16
00:00:45,254 --> 00:00:46,934
thing is are there no dumb questions?

17
00:00:46,934 --> 00:00:50,774
And oftentimes, I found in the beginning when I
was young, I wouldn't understand a concept or

18
00:00:50,774 --> 00:00:52,214
it was being presented a certain way.

19
00:00:52,214 --> 00:00:55,975
And the reality is is it was being sold, you
know, as you asked earlier, in a in a more

20
00:00:55,975 --> 00:00:56,750
complex structure.

21
00:00:56,750 --> 00:00:59,950
But at the end of the day, it's a much simple
concept and just asking the question.

22
00:00:59,950 --> 00:01:05,329
And I think that helps create dialogues between
LPs and GPs, asking questions to teammates,

23
00:01:05,709 --> 00:01:08,370
bosses, mentors that are much more experienced.

24
00:01:08,590 --> 00:01:12,115
You have to build the confidence to ask simple
questions over your career.

25
00:01:12,115 --> 00:01:12,935
It's a paradox.

26
00:01:20,674 --> 00:01:22,275
Dean, I've been excited to chat.

27
00:01:22,275 --> 00:01:23,895
Welcome to 10x Capital podcast.

28
00:01:24,060 --> 00:01:24,619
Thanks, David.

29
00:01:24,619 --> 00:01:25,340
It's great to be here.

30
00:01:25,340 --> 00:01:26,719
Appreciate you having me on.

31
00:01:27,019 --> 00:01:30,479
So tell me about KFF, formerly known as the
Kaiser Family Foundation.

32
00:01:31,099 --> 00:01:31,599
Yeah.

33
00:01:31,819 --> 00:01:36,000
KFF is a wonderful organization and one that
I'm really proud to support.

34
00:01:36,155 --> 00:01:40,314
The organization is doing really important,
impactful work, and knowing that and coming to

35
00:01:40,314 --> 00:01:43,994
work every day really centers us, you know, on
the work that we do.

36
00:01:43,994 --> 00:01:48,234
KFF is a public charity that is an independent
source of health policy research, polling, and

37
00:01:48,234 --> 00:01:48,734
journalism.

38
00:01:49,150 --> 00:01:55,009
We have 4 major program areas at KFF, policy
polling, health news, and social impact media.

39
00:01:55,229 --> 00:01:59,969
And as the CIO, tell me how you've established
your asset allocation across different assets.

40
00:02:00,030 --> 00:02:03,974
The way I think about it is the asset
allocation and the portfolio is always built in

41
00:02:03,974 --> 00:02:08,694
service of the organization, putting together a
portfolio that that furthers, you know, our

42
00:02:08,694 --> 00:02:10,634
goals and the needs of the organizations.

43
00:02:10,694 --> 00:02:13,574
You know, with that in mind, you know, I don't
think our asset allocation will look very

44
00:02:13,574 --> 00:02:17,834
different from a lot of our, you know,
institutional endowment foundation peers.

45
00:02:18,150 --> 00:02:21,370
That is, we we have a decent illiquid
allocation within the portfolio.

46
00:02:21,590 --> 00:02:25,750
We have a healthy allocation to alternative
investments that support traditional equities,

47
00:02:25,750 --> 00:02:28,490
fixed income, and real estate and real asset
investments.

48
00:02:28,710 --> 00:02:31,830
And so, you know, the approach we take is, you
know, we're not trying to reinvent the the

49
00:02:31,830 --> 00:02:32,384
wheel here.

50
00:02:32,384 --> 00:02:36,625
We're building a diversified portfolio that can
generate the type of returns that we need to

51
00:02:36,625 --> 00:02:39,204
support our mission and support the goals of
the organization.

52
00:02:39,664 --> 00:02:41,125
How do you know you're diversified?

53
00:02:41,584 --> 00:02:42,644
That's a good question.

54
00:02:42,784 --> 00:02:46,864
And I think one that, you know, a lot of people
it's a word diversification is a word that a

55
00:02:46,864 --> 00:02:51,449
lot of people like to use without potentially
understanding the impact and actual meaning of

56
00:02:51,449 --> 00:02:52,169
what it is.

57
00:02:52,169 --> 00:02:56,989
You know, having exposure to different asset
classes may appear on paper to be diversified,

58
00:02:57,530 --> 00:03:02,330
but, you know, as we saw even in in 2022, when
equities and fixed income were both down double

59
00:03:02,330 --> 00:03:06,014
digits, you know, people had assumed that maybe
they were appropriately diversified or hedged

60
00:03:06,155 --> 00:03:09,375
because they had access or exposure to these 2
different asset classes.

61
00:03:09,675 --> 00:03:11,275
But in fact, that was not the case.

62
00:03:11,275 --> 00:03:14,955
And so, you know, I think it's one of those
things where, you know, it's incumbent on us as

63
00:03:14,955 --> 00:03:18,870
part of the investment staff to to understand
and underwrite our investments and build a

64
00:03:18,870 --> 00:03:24,310
portfolio such that our exposures, the factor
exposures, the geographical sector, you know,

65
00:03:24,310 --> 00:03:29,189
asset type exposures all come together to build
a portfolio that is more durable and

66
00:03:29,189 --> 00:03:29,689
diversified.

67
00:03:29,909 --> 00:03:31,370
How do you know you're actually diversified?

68
00:03:31,590 --> 00:03:34,305
I think it's one of those where you don't know
till you know.

69
00:03:34,544 --> 00:03:38,625
And if if you think that you are, in many
cases, you aren't, that's when there's some

70
00:03:38,625 --> 00:03:40,305
real, you know, pain in a portfolio.

71
00:03:40,305 --> 00:03:44,705
But, you know, ultimately, we do our best to
make sure that we're building a portfolio that

72
00:03:44,705 --> 00:03:46,199
is complementary to each other.

73
00:03:46,360 --> 00:03:48,219
I thought I was diversified in 2022.

74
00:03:48,360 --> 00:03:53,000
I was in venture capital, crypto, biotech, even
some SPACs.

75
00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:55,099
And lo and behold, they were all highly
correlated.

76
00:03:55,479 --> 00:03:57,080
Is that just a blip?

77
00:03:57,080 --> 00:04:01,935
Or is macroeconomics changing in a way that
there's much more correlation between assets?

78
00:04:01,935 --> 00:04:05,314
And how do you actually know how do you
quantify your diversification?

79
00:04:05,935 --> 00:04:06,254
Yeah.

80
00:04:06,254 --> 00:04:06,974
It's a good question.

81
00:04:06,974 --> 00:04:10,814
And I think it's one of those ones where, you
know, if you look back for, you know, a decade

82
00:04:10,814 --> 00:04:14,379
plus with with rates anchored to 0, I think a
lot of people got a false sense of

83
00:04:14,379 --> 00:04:18,860
understanding of what correlations were between
different asset classes, when in effect it was

84
00:04:18,860 --> 00:04:24,459
just a, you know, an outcome of rates anchored
to 0 with no, you know, forecast to go up, risk

85
00:04:24,459 --> 00:04:30,725
assets all traded together or were able to be
much less discerning with their capital, in

86
00:04:30,725 --> 00:04:31,365
search of growth.

87
00:04:31,365 --> 00:04:35,685
And I think that was kind of a factor that
defined the last decade, decade and a half.

88
00:04:35,845 --> 00:04:40,485
And as we saw rates rise in a much more, you
know, steep and rapid fashion than than maybe

89
00:04:40,485 --> 00:04:45,009
people had anticipated, The reaction of the
different asset classes, you know, to that

90
00:04:45,009 --> 00:04:48,949
environment really changed how people hopefully
think about correlation and diversification

91
00:04:49,170 --> 00:04:50,149
within their portfolio.

92
00:04:50,769 --> 00:04:54,149
You know, the macroeconomic picture is one
that's always going to be uncertain.

93
00:04:54,425 --> 00:04:58,504
There are lots of people who make lots of
different predictions on the path of rates, the

94
00:04:58,504 --> 00:05:02,504
state of the economy, you know, geopolitical
conflict that catch a lot of people by

95
00:05:02,504 --> 00:05:02,904
surprise.

96
00:05:02,904 --> 00:05:07,419
And and so, you know, at the end of the day,
you're never going to know that beforehand,

97
00:05:08,199 --> 00:05:13,079
and, you know, we can just hope that the work
we do helps put a portfolio in place that that

98
00:05:13,079 --> 00:05:17,019
can perform, as I said, during, you know, some
of those uncertain macroeconomic.

99
00:05:17,479 --> 00:05:19,800
How do you think about macroeconomics in
general?

100
00:05:19,800 --> 00:05:24,464
There's a lot of the LPs that say, we're going
to invest as of the next 50 years, the same in

101
00:05:24,464 --> 00:05:24,964
macroeconomic.

102
00:05:25,264 --> 00:05:29,524
There's other other ones that try to get
directionally correct, thesis driven.

103
00:05:29,584 --> 00:05:30,805
How do you look at that?

104
00:05:31,345 --> 00:05:31,664
Yeah.

105
00:05:31,664 --> 00:05:35,024
I think there are 2 different types of, you
know, investors.

106
00:05:35,024 --> 00:05:38,879
There are some people and managers and GPs that
say, Look, there's a lot about macroeconomics

107
00:05:39,099 --> 00:05:41,819
that we can't control, we don't know, and we
can't forecast.

108
00:05:41,819 --> 00:05:46,379
So why are we going to spend valuable time and
effort trying to predict something that is

109
00:05:46,379 --> 00:05:46,879
unpredictable?

110
00:05:46,939 --> 00:05:51,019
So we're just going to focus on the
fundamentals of the either, you know, stocks,

111
00:05:51,019 --> 00:05:54,964
bonds, you know, companies, etcetera, that we
can underwrite, and we'll let the rest take

112
00:05:54,964 --> 00:05:55,604
care of ourselves.

113
00:05:55,604 --> 00:05:58,964
There are some people that that obviously say
that, you know, if you're not, quote, unquote,

114
00:05:58,964 --> 00:06:03,925
macro aware, if you ignore such an impactful
part on what generates returns and outcomes for

115
00:06:03,925 --> 00:06:06,805
portfolios, you know, you're being doing a
little bit of a disservice to to the

116
00:06:06,805 --> 00:06:07,305
investments.

117
00:06:07,500 --> 00:06:11,660
You know, I'd say we probably fall in that 2nd
bucket, which is, you know, trying our best to

118
00:06:11,660 --> 00:06:15,259
be macro aware, but understanding the
limitations that that come with, you know,

119
00:06:15,259 --> 00:06:18,139
understanding the macro, the macroeconomic
picture.

120
00:06:18,139 --> 00:06:21,254
I think you looked early August as, you know, a
prime example of that.

121
00:06:21,254 --> 00:06:25,814
There was, you know, a week where there was a
chain reaction where markets sold off violently

122
00:06:25,814 --> 00:06:28,694
and people were trying to understand, you know,
what was going on.

123
00:06:28,694 --> 00:06:32,455
But you fast forward, you know, a couple weeks
later, the end of the month, and if you had

124
00:06:32,455 --> 00:06:36,090
guessed where the market was going to be in
early August where it would end up in in late

125
00:06:36,090 --> 00:06:38,970
August, I don't know that a lot of people would
have potentially gotten that right because of

126
00:06:38,970 --> 00:06:40,250
the fear and uncertainty at the time.

127
00:06:40,250 --> 00:06:45,129
And so, you know, I think it always help helps
to step back and and and and be patient and to

128
00:06:45,129 --> 00:06:48,795
not overreact to, you know, individual days or
periods in the market.

129
00:06:48,955 --> 00:06:51,915
Coming back to your original question, I think
it's one of those things where, you know, we

130
00:06:51,915 --> 00:06:56,955
know that we're not going to predict or
understand the path of rates or the market

131
00:06:56,955 --> 00:07:00,795
that's driven by the macroeconomics, but we try
to understand what are the the underlying

132
00:07:00,795 --> 00:07:05,009
forces that are pushing and pulling on the
market and at least, you know, being prepared

133
00:07:05,229 --> 00:07:07,729
to understand, you know, what those forces are.

134
00:07:07,790 --> 00:07:13,709
In the same vein, do you look at themes,
thematic investing, like health care or AI as

135
00:07:13,709 --> 00:07:17,069
it pertains to your entire portfolio, over the
long term?

136
00:07:17,069 --> 00:07:21,035
Or do you just kind of look at them as specific
verticals where you try to get diversification?

137
00:07:21,574 --> 00:07:24,455
It's a good question and one one of those
things where I don't know that there's a right

138
00:07:24,455 --> 00:07:28,055
answer and I'm sure people are able to, you
know, take both approaches and and do so

139
00:07:28,055 --> 00:07:29,175
successfully or not.

140
00:07:29,175 --> 00:07:32,134
You know, on the health health care piece, you
know, dedicated health care investment is

141
00:07:32,134 --> 00:07:35,889
something that we generally avoid given the
mandate of our organization in being a, you

142
00:07:35,889 --> 00:07:38,790
know, nonpartisan, apolitical, you know, source
of information.

143
00:07:39,490 --> 00:07:43,970
For, you know, a lot of people, we've generally
avoided doing dedicated health care thematic

144
00:07:43,970 --> 00:07:44,470
investing.

145
00:07:44,850 --> 00:07:48,834
The second thing you mentioned, AI, you know,
is also an interesting topic just because, what

146
00:07:48,834 --> 00:07:52,675
we're hearing is that, you know, every company
is going to be an AI company, and our public

147
00:07:52,675 --> 00:07:56,035
equity managers are investing in stocks that
are, you know, public companies are

148
00:07:56,035 --> 00:07:59,394
incorporating AI into their workflows and their
products, etcetera, etcetera.

149
00:07:59,394 --> 00:08:01,709
Venture, I think goes without saying.

150
00:08:02,189 --> 00:08:06,269
And so in that sense, I think there are some
longer secular themes that you want to be

151
00:08:06,269 --> 00:08:07,149
aligned with.

152
00:08:07,149 --> 00:08:11,069
This is kind of how we think about it where,
you know, if there are some long term melting

153
00:08:11,069 --> 00:08:16,954
ice cubes, maybe there are some incremental
returns you can pick up while people have

154
00:08:16,954 --> 00:08:21,055
discarded or, you know, avoid, you know, hated
or or dying industries.

155
00:08:21,194 --> 00:08:25,834
But in general, I think it makes more sense to
be aligned with the long term cyclical secular

156
00:08:25,834 --> 00:08:28,495
trends, that will benefit, you know,
portfolios.

157
00:08:29,290 --> 00:08:29,610
Hey.

158
00:08:29,610 --> 00:08:31,710
We'll be right back after a word from our
sponsor.

159
00:08:32,250 --> 00:08:36,170
Our sponsor for today's episode is Carta, the
end to end accounting platform purposely built

160
00:08:36,170 --> 00:08:37,149
for fund CFOs.

161
00:08:37,529 --> 00:08:41,549
For the first time ever, private fund operators
can leverage their very own bespoke software

162
00:08:41,610 --> 00:08:44,670
that's designed from the ground up to bring
their whole portfolio together.

163
00:08:44,924 --> 00:08:49,184
This enables formations, transactions, and
distributions to flow seamlessly and accurately

164
00:08:49,245 --> 00:08:50,304
to limited partners.

165
00:08:50,445 --> 00:08:54,445
The end result is a remarkably fast and precise
platform that empowers better strategic

166
00:08:54,445 --> 00:08:58,065
decision making and delivers transformational
insights on demand.

167
00:08:58,125 --> 00:09:01,159
Come see the new standard in private fund
management atz.carta.comforward/10xpod.

168
00:09:03,539 --> 00:09:04,360
That's z.carta.comforward/10xpod.

169
00:09:07,139 --> 00:09:12,419
I was speaking to Baylor's Renee Hanna, and she
mentioned how she would strategically build

170
00:09:12,419 --> 00:09:17,095
relationships with her GPs in order for them to
keep her abreast in the venture market, what's

171
00:09:17,095 --> 00:09:18,394
going on, different factors.

172
00:09:18,694 --> 00:09:21,654
Do you have those kind of relationships on the
macro side?

173
00:09:21,654 --> 00:09:24,694
Do you leverage public managers in a way to try
to get

174
00:09:24,694 --> 00:09:25,595
macro aware?

175
00:09:25,654 --> 00:09:26,154
Absolutely.

176
00:09:26,294 --> 00:09:26,774
We do.

177
00:09:27,095 --> 00:09:31,809
You know, the the roster of managers that we
have on the public side or the hedge fund side,

178
00:09:31,809 --> 00:09:33,730
you know, are in the portfolio for a reason.

179
00:09:33,730 --> 00:09:37,809
We certainly underwrite, you know, both the
strategy but also the teams pretty intently

180
00:09:37,809 --> 00:09:39,110
before we make an allocation.

181
00:09:39,649 --> 00:09:43,570
And part of that relationship is is we hope,
you know, a two way relationship whereby, you

182
00:09:43,570 --> 00:09:47,815
know, we're able to pass along some information
or intel that we get from some of our other

183
00:09:47,815 --> 00:09:51,735
managers that helps them, you know, think about
the markets that they invest and vice versa.

184
00:09:51,735 --> 00:09:57,014
You know, when we talk to them, we try to
understand their perspective, their view based

185
00:09:57,014 --> 00:10:00,235
on, you know, the markets that they operate or
the strategies that they execute.

186
00:10:00,429 --> 00:10:05,790
What we try to, you know, make sure that we we
temper is is making sure that we don't take

187
00:10:05,790 --> 00:10:09,470
every word that, you know, one of our managers
says is gospel, and then we use it as part of a

188
00:10:09,470 --> 00:10:11,149
Mosaic where we talk to a lot of different
people.

189
00:10:11,149 --> 00:10:14,325
We try to build a picture from discussions we
have across the board.

190
00:10:14,404 --> 00:10:18,904
But absolutely, you know, leveraging the
relationships with the existing portfolio GPs,

191
00:10:19,125 --> 00:10:22,725
you know, to get smarter on different, you
know, themes or or things going on in the

192
00:10:22,725 --> 00:10:26,585
market is always an important part of the
relationship we have with our GPs.

193
00:10:27,289 --> 00:10:31,289
And you mentioned getting a mosaic of
information, essentially talking to different

194
00:10:31,289 --> 00:10:33,149
parties and getting different opinions.

195
00:10:33,610 --> 00:10:36,329
Talk me through the average day.

196
00:10:36,329 --> 00:10:38,409
How much of it is done with investing?

197
00:10:38,409 --> 00:10:39,789
How much is it is administrative?

198
00:10:39,929 --> 00:10:41,629
How much is it gathering information?

199
00:10:41,769 --> 00:10:43,745
Breakdown how you manage your portfolio.

200
00:10:43,965 --> 00:10:45,245
No 2 days are the same, David.

201
00:10:45,565 --> 00:10:47,904
You know, that that's what makes it exciting
and interesting.

202
00:10:48,285 --> 00:10:51,644
But, you know, I mean that in that sense, in
that, you know, look, we're always getting a

203
00:10:51,644 --> 00:10:55,404
lot of information into our inbox from
different service providers, banks, managers,

204
00:10:55,404 --> 00:10:57,710
you know, prospective managers, etcetera,
etcetera.

205
00:10:57,710 --> 00:11:01,889
So, you know, reading through letters, tear
sheets, research pieces, etcetera, etcetera,

206
00:11:02,110 --> 00:11:05,790
you know, making sure we're scheduling updates
with the existing portfolio to make sure we

207
00:11:05,790 --> 00:11:09,070
understand what our managers are doing, how
they're shifting the portfolio, etcetera,

208
00:11:09,070 --> 00:11:09,570
etcetera.

209
00:11:09,695 --> 00:11:10,894
We have a generalist model.

210
00:11:10,894 --> 00:11:14,414
During a given day, we might talk to a, you
know, a long only equity manager that's focused

211
00:11:14,414 --> 00:11:18,654
on international or emerging market stocks,
while at the same time having a discussion, you

212
00:11:18,654 --> 00:11:23,455
know, with a core fixed income manager, and a
real estate manager and, you know, a hedge fund

213
00:11:23,455 --> 00:11:24,149
at the same time.

214
00:11:24,309 --> 00:11:27,509
The risk is that you overschedule yourself and
you don't allow yourself that time to reflect

215
00:11:27,509 --> 00:11:31,110
and think on what you've heard, what you've
learned, what you've read, which can, you know,

216
00:11:31,110 --> 00:11:33,990
shape the direction of of how you wanna spend
that time moving forward.

217
00:11:33,990 --> 00:11:37,990
One thing I've been really thinking about is
the difference between a GP that has good

218
00:11:37,990 --> 00:11:40,945
performance and that could sell in almost 2
different groups.

219
00:11:40,945 --> 00:11:42,304
And sometimes they have both skills.

220
00:11:42,304 --> 00:11:45,205
Sometimes one person has one skill, another
person has another skill.

221
00:11:45,585 --> 00:11:50,785
Talk to me about really trying to differentiate
between who is really good at selling and who's

222
00:11:50,785 --> 00:11:51,845
really good at performance.

223
00:11:51,904 --> 00:11:53,924
And how do you avoid being sold?

224
00:11:54,240 --> 00:11:54,740
Yeah.

225
00:11:54,799 --> 00:11:57,120
Great question and something that we think
about constantly.

226
00:11:57,120 --> 00:12:01,519
I think, you know, one of the lenses or filters
as an LP, you know, you develop kind of early

227
00:12:01,519 --> 00:12:03,440
is understanding that you're always being sold
to.

228
00:12:03,440 --> 00:12:07,360
And that affects the dynamic of every
discussion you have whether the intent is there

229
00:12:07,360 --> 00:12:07,904
or not.

230
00:12:07,985 --> 00:12:12,545
Know, at the end of the day, the the LP is an
asset owner, and and the GPs are asset

231
00:12:12,545 --> 00:12:15,264
managers, and they're looking to manage money
on behalf of the LP.

232
00:12:15,264 --> 00:12:17,205
And so that that comes with every interaction.

233
00:12:18,065 --> 00:12:21,230
But, you know, one of the things regarding
performance that we try to think about is

234
00:12:21,230 --> 00:12:23,629
making sure we're not conflating process and
outcome.

235
00:12:23,629 --> 00:12:26,909
You know, again, this is not something
groundbreaking or new, but, you know, there

236
00:12:26,909 --> 00:12:31,309
there are, you know, many instances where firms
can have good performance with with bad process

237
00:12:31,309 --> 00:12:33,389
and, you know, that's where you can run into
mistakes.

238
00:12:33,389 --> 00:12:38,125
And so, you know, 1st and foremost, trying to
not take performance on its face as good or

239
00:12:38,125 --> 00:12:41,825
bad, because there are a lot of factors that go
into that performance.

240
00:12:42,285 --> 00:12:46,125
And the outcome is sometimes not controllable,
but the process is.

241
00:12:46,125 --> 00:12:50,929
And and so making sure that we're consistent
and clear on how we think about process, and

242
00:12:50,929 --> 00:12:54,850
not over focusing on performance, you know, as
the only metric that matters.

243
00:12:54,850 --> 00:12:57,570
So that's one of the things that that that we
try to focus on.

244
00:12:57,570 --> 00:13:01,410
But in terms of selling and and and what that
means and, you know, are we being sold to, I

245
00:13:01,410 --> 00:13:06,384
think focus on on the former, which is good
process regardless of outcome, allows us to

246
00:13:06,384 --> 00:13:10,384
kind of cut through some of that that selling
stuff, which is where if we consistently have a

247
00:13:10,384 --> 00:13:14,785
framework whereby which we are evaluating GPs,
you know, and that's different across each of

248
00:13:14,785 --> 00:13:18,590
the different asset classes that we invest in,
But having a clear understanding of that,

249
00:13:18,730 --> 00:13:23,370
having a process that is fairly consistent, I
think allows us to hopefully cut out some of

250
00:13:23,370 --> 00:13:26,830
that noise around being sold to and focus on
the things that matter.

251
00:13:27,129 --> 00:13:28,330
I think it also depends.

252
00:13:28,330 --> 00:13:31,665
Sometimes being a good salesman is part of the
job in venture capital.

253
00:13:31,665 --> 00:13:35,585
Whereas in hedge funds, you're a passive
player, and it's about having the highest IQs

254
00:13:35,585 --> 00:13:36,545
and and the best rate.

255
00:13:36,545 --> 00:13:39,445
So sometimes it's it's literally part of the
job qualification.

256
00:13:39,825 --> 00:13:45,250
One of the issues I see in GPs pitching LPs is
that they really have 30 minutes to very

257
00:13:45,250 --> 00:13:46,690
clearly explain a strategy.

258
00:13:46,690 --> 00:13:52,290
And I see oftentimes a bias towards very simple
sounding strategies and a bias against complex

259
00:13:52,290 --> 00:13:52,790
strategies.

260
00:13:53,090 --> 00:13:53,570
It depends.

261
00:13:53,570 --> 00:13:54,049
Right?

262
00:13:54,049 --> 00:13:59,205
I think, you know, in many cases, you know,
simplicity is celebrated and appreciated by

263
00:13:59,205 --> 00:13:59,684
many people.

264
00:13:59,684 --> 00:14:04,165
If you if you can write your strategy on a
napkin and define it, you know, in a 30 second

265
00:14:04,165 --> 00:14:07,865
elevator ride, then many people might argue
that you you you'll be more consistent.

266
00:14:07,924 --> 00:14:10,264
You know, people can tell if you're straying
from your strategy.

267
00:14:10,404 --> 00:14:11,669
You're not trying to do too much.

268
00:14:11,750 --> 00:14:14,629
You focus on one thing, and you do it better
than anyone else.

269
00:14:14,629 --> 00:14:17,350
Well, I think there is some merit to that, you
know, obviously.

270
00:14:17,350 --> 00:14:20,089
I think complexity again, it depends.

271
00:14:20,149 --> 00:14:25,110
If complexity is trying to be complex as a
feature of the strategy, then I'm not

272
00:14:25,110 --> 00:14:27,129
necessarily sure that that adds anything.

273
00:14:27,475 --> 00:14:32,115
But if there is an investment opportunity that
requires complex understanding of a certain

274
00:14:32,115 --> 00:14:36,914
market or structure or asset and, you know, the
specific GP has a better knowledge or for

275
00:14:36,914 --> 00:14:41,139
whatever reason has a competitive advantage
around that specific complexity, you know, one,

276
00:14:41,139 --> 00:14:45,059
I would I would like to believe that if that
were the case, they would learn how to explain

277
00:14:45,059 --> 00:14:48,600
it in a way that people understand that makes
it special for them.

278
00:14:48,659 --> 00:14:52,179
And so, you know, in that sense, I think
complexity would be an asset because it would

279
00:14:52,179 --> 00:14:56,634
create barriers to entry or, you know, it would
eliminate lots of, you know, quote, unquote,

280
00:14:56,634 --> 00:15:01,434
investment tourists coming in trying to access
this investment versus someone who is an expert

281
00:15:01,434 --> 00:15:04,174
who understands this, who's been investing in
it for a long time.

282
00:15:04,394 --> 00:15:08,315
And so, again, you know, I think it it just
depends on on the type of asset, the type of

283
00:15:08,315 --> 00:15:12,139
strategy, and the role that it's looking to be
played in a given portfolio.

284
00:15:12,200 --> 00:15:13,899
So it would depend, I think.

285
00:15:14,200 --> 00:15:18,440
So in the grand scheme of things, you guys are
a $700,000,000 endowment, which was on the

286
00:15:18,440 --> 00:15:19,320
smaller side.

287
00:15:19,320 --> 00:15:20,860
How does that play into your strategy?

288
00:15:20,919 --> 00:15:24,764
Like with anything, there are pros and cons to
any feature of an organization.

289
00:15:25,065 --> 00:15:29,865
You know, at our size, I think we're we're
large enough to be institutional, and to be

290
00:15:29,865 --> 00:15:34,585
able to build a portfolio like we talked about
earlier that has access and, you know, the the

291
00:15:34,585 --> 00:15:38,629
capacity to invest in in different types of
asset classes and and build what we think is a

292
00:15:38,629 --> 00:15:40,169
diversified institutional portfolio.

293
00:15:40,710 --> 00:15:44,950
At our size, I think we're big enough to matter
for a lot of the the well known institutional

294
00:15:44,950 --> 00:15:50,549
funds, but we're also not so large whereby
capacity or access can be a limiting factor for

295
00:15:50,549 --> 00:15:50,789
us.

296
00:15:50,789 --> 00:15:52,809
We don't often find that to be the case.

297
00:15:52,924 --> 00:15:56,524
You know, at our size, we're able to invest in
maybe some of these strategies that that other

298
00:15:56,524 --> 00:16:01,644
larger organizations simply don't have the
ability to do so because the checks they need

299
00:16:01,644 --> 00:16:05,245
to write are substantially larger, and it
wouldn't make sense, you know, for what the

300
00:16:05,245 --> 00:16:06,539
strategy calls for.

301
00:16:06,699 --> 00:16:09,259
In terms of the downsides to it, I think there
are really just 2.

302
00:16:09,259 --> 00:16:13,659
If you look at investment expense and resources
as a percent of assets, obviously, the math

303
00:16:13,659 --> 00:16:18,059
won't add up to to some of the larger peers
that that can, you know, spend a lot more money

304
00:16:18,059 --> 00:16:22,695
on different resources, you know, as it relates
to to portfolio building and management,

305
00:16:22,915 --> 00:16:23,415
etcetera.

306
00:16:23,634 --> 00:16:28,035
And then the other one that that some might say
is just that at our size, as an investor in

307
00:16:28,035 --> 00:16:33,075
some funds, we might not have the leverage or
voice to to dictate terms, fees, or have a bit

308
00:16:33,075 --> 00:16:35,254
more influence in some of those factors.

309
00:16:35,610 --> 00:16:39,769
But but as with anything, you know, I think we
understand what those limitations are with with

310
00:16:39,769 --> 00:16:44,330
our size, and and we try to be creative in
working around, you know, in working around

311
00:16:44,330 --> 00:16:44,730
those.

312
00:16:44,730 --> 00:16:48,570
On the size, in terms of dictating terms and
fees, it it might be that we're a better

313
00:16:48,570 --> 00:16:53,144
thought partner to the GPs, and and we we make
our viewpoint heard in other ways that, you

314
00:16:53,144 --> 00:16:55,164
know, they value our feedback.

315
00:16:55,304 --> 00:16:58,585
You know, resource wise, it's just being a lot
more disciplined on where we're spending our

316
00:16:58,585 --> 00:17:02,664
time and how we're focusing, leveraging our
network to maybe get answers that, you know, we

317
00:17:02,664 --> 00:17:06,200
didn't have in house, but, you know, we build
relationships such that we can work around

318
00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:06,359
that.

319
00:17:06,359 --> 00:17:10,680
And so, you know, as with anything, there there
are pluses and minuses and and just making sure

320
00:17:10,680 --> 00:17:14,680
that, you know, we're looking to optimize what
those pluses are and managing around what what

321
00:17:14,680 --> 00:17:17,019
any of those perceived shortcomings might be.

322
00:17:17,305 --> 00:17:20,984
Had a lot of institutional LPs tell me off the
record that their favorite check size would be

323
00:17:20,984 --> 00:17:21,724
10 to 30,000,000.

324
00:17:22,265 --> 00:17:26,184
I'm not sure how how they get to that, but
probably roughly, you know, be able to invest

325
00:17:26,184 --> 00:17:33,005
in sub $300,000,000 funds, but also, be able to
command enough attention from from GPs as well.

326
00:17:33,200 --> 00:17:37,920
So when we last chatted, you mentioned that a
100% of your private allocation is into venture

327
00:17:37,920 --> 00:17:38,420
capital.

328
00:17:38,559 --> 00:17:39,680
I had to do a double take.

329
00:17:39,680 --> 00:17:40,660
Tell me about that.

330
00:17:41,119 --> 00:17:41,359
Yeah.

331
00:17:41,359 --> 00:17:44,980
So I think it's one of those things that it's a
coming together of a few factors.

332
00:17:45,039 --> 00:17:46,845
That that wasn't always the case.

333
00:17:46,845 --> 00:17:51,345
There was some, you know, non venture private
equity in the portfolio a while ago.

334
00:17:51,484 --> 00:17:56,045
But as we looked at our portfolio and our
private allocation, there were a few things

335
00:17:56,045 --> 00:17:57,644
that really, you know, came to mind.

336
00:17:57,644 --> 00:18:01,849
You know, one is, you know, I think it's fairly
well known that empirically, you know, venture

337
00:18:01,849 --> 00:18:06,170
capital is an asset class where there is a
persistence of returns at least more than than

338
00:18:06,170 --> 00:18:07,130
any other asset class.

339
00:18:07,130 --> 00:18:10,829
So understanding that there is a persistence of
returns in this asset class.

340
00:18:11,049 --> 00:18:16,765
Secondly, if you're able to access that right
tail of managers, the long term performance is

341
00:18:16,765 --> 00:18:17,265
exceptional.

342
00:18:17,485 --> 00:18:19,485
And I think that's been proven over time.

343
00:18:19,485 --> 00:18:21,565
Again, that's not beta for an asset class.

344
00:18:21,565 --> 00:18:25,005
That is, you know, access, you know,
identifying an access that that that that right

345
00:18:25,005 --> 00:18:27,345
tail of managers within this asset class.

346
00:18:27,404 --> 00:18:30,065
That was combined with the fact on the private
equity portfolio.

347
00:18:30,950 --> 00:18:32,230
It's a massive market.

348
00:18:32,230 --> 00:18:36,470
Obviously, we sit in San Francisco and, you
know, we think venture is an area we spend a

349
00:18:36,470 --> 00:18:40,230
lot of time, but the private equity world is
just much, much, much larger than the venture

350
00:18:40,230 --> 00:18:40,710
world.

351
00:18:40,710 --> 00:18:45,505
And really understanding that we did not have
any type of edge or competitive advantage in,

352
00:18:45,505 --> 00:18:50,484
you know, sourcing, accessing, underwriting,
allocating to private equity.

353
00:18:50,544 --> 00:18:54,384
And there really wasn't a cohesive strategy
around how we wanted to execute that.

354
00:18:54,384 --> 00:18:57,930
We just didn't have a clear path on how we
wanted to do that.

355
00:18:58,009 --> 00:19:00,350
At the time, we undertook this exercise.

356
00:19:00,490 --> 00:19:04,269
Our offices were on San Hill Road, so
locationally, there was some benefit there.

357
00:19:04,570 --> 00:19:08,970
You know, Kaiser slash KFF is a name that is
well known in the valley, you know, our work

358
00:19:08,970 --> 00:19:11,724
and our mission, and so that would help with
access.

359
00:19:11,865 --> 00:19:15,384
And then, you know, people understanding our
mission, you know, we certainly thought was

360
00:19:15,384 --> 00:19:18,045
gonna be beneficial, for accessing some of
these managers.

361
00:19:18,265 --> 00:19:22,904
And then it just allowed us to concentrate our
time and focus on a on a smaller subset of the

362
00:19:22,904 --> 00:19:27,250
market that we felt if we could, you know,
dedicate more time, effort, and energy, we

363
00:19:27,250 --> 00:19:28,470
could build a better portfolio.

364
00:19:28,769 --> 00:19:33,649
And so, you know, the coming together of all
those factors, you know, has led to this led to

365
00:19:33,649 --> 00:19:38,849
this outcome in whereby there is no traditional
private equity buyout in the portfolio as it

366
00:19:38,849 --> 00:19:39,349
stands.

367
00:19:40,035 --> 00:19:44,355
Just to play devil's advocate, I think it's
really self aware that you guys focused on

368
00:19:44,355 --> 00:19:48,035
venture capital, and you realize you didn't
have competitive advantage in private equity.

369
00:19:48,035 --> 00:19:54,190
But why not access private equity via fund of
funds or via OCIO or other form factors that

370
00:19:54,190 --> 00:19:56,929
would allow you to access the S Class.

371
00:19:56,990 --> 00:19:58,429
You know, look, you're not wrong.

372
00:19:58,429 --> 00:20:01,190
Those are certainly other considerations or
ways we could have.

373
00:20:01,190 --> 00:20:04,990
You know, going direct was is something that's
been core to our strategy for a while.

374
00:20:04,990 --> 00:20:09,195
And, you know, investing in a fund to fund
structure for a lot of reasons is not something

375
00:20:09,195 --> 00:20:10,875
that we're super interested in.

376
00:20:10,875 --> 00:20:14,555
And I think, again, it came back to this belief
where, you know, venture capital returns for

377
00:20:14,555 --> 00:20:19,914
any liquid dollar, if we could maximize our
positioning as an LP and access the best of the

378
00:20:19,914 --> 00:20:23,960
best, then, you know, I think, empirically
would suggest that long term, that's a better

379
00:20:23,960 --> 00:20:26,779
place to be than than some private equity beta.

380
00:20:27,160 --> 00:20:31,799
And so, you know, that that's kind of why the
decision was made, and that's kind of why we've

381
00:20:31,799 --> 00:20:33,259
ended up the way we are.

382
00:20:33,400 --> 00:20:38,184
As you played devil at advocate, those are
certainly valid questions and options.

383
00:20:38,724 --> 00:20:41,605
And not to say that those wouldn't be good
outcomes either.

384
00:20:41,605 --> 00:20:45,924
We just felt at the time what was optimal or
necessary for our organization was was this

385
00:20:45,924 --> 00:20:46,424
direction.

386
00:20:47,500 --> 00:20:49,359
You have a bit of a contrarian view.

387
00:20:49,420 --> 00:20:52,940
You believe that the main issue in venture
capital is not timing the market, but

388
00:20:52,940 --> 00:20:54,240
stomaching the illiquidity.

389
00:20:55,019 --> 00:20:58,694
Tell me about why you believe investing in
venture capital in any market.

390
00:20:58,934 --> 00:20:59,174
Yeah.

391
00:20:59,174 --> 00:21:01,654
So again, I think this comes back to a few
things.

392
00:21:01,654 --> 00:21:06,134
1, we have the benefits of being, you know, an
organization that has perpetual capital.

393
00:21:06,134 --> 00:21:10,615
That that should be something we lean into, and
leverage as a competitive advantage versus a

394
00:21:10,615 --> 00:21:12,509
lot of other investors in the market.

395
00:21:12,670 --> 00:21:17,150
And again, coming back to this persistence of
returns, you know, for the asset class and

396
00:21:17,150 --> 00:21:18,190
access to the right tail.

397
00:21:18,190 --> 00:21:21,630
Again, you know, the biggest issue is not
necessarily just stomaching the liquidity

398
00:21:21,630 --> 00:21:25,309
because I think the debt also would show you
that if you have just venture capital beta,

399
00:21:25,309 --> 00:21:29,664
there are a lot more issues you're gonna have
than than just illiquidity, because venture

400
00:21:29,664 --> 00:21:34,144
capital beta is not necessarily something you
want to introduce or have a lot of in the

401
00:21:34,144 --> 00:21:34,644
portfolio.

402
00:21:34,865 --> 00:21:39,684
The purpose of investing in the asset class is
to access those right tail managers to generate

403
00:21:40,304 --> 00:21:41,970
material outperformance over time.

404
00:21:42,450 --> 00:21:46,049
In terms of, you know, investing through cycles
within venture, you can stomach the

405
00:21:46,049 --> 00:21:46,529
illiquidity.

406
00:21:46,529 --> 00:21:51,409
Great companies are being formed at all
periods, you know, within the venture and start

407
00:21:51,409 --> 00:21:52,049
up market.

408
00:21:52,049 --> 00:21:55,744
And the structure of these firms is such that
you know, seed and early stage firms are are

409
00:21:55,744 --> 00:22:00,304
buying material ownership in these businesses
that take a long time to build and compound

410
00:22:00,304 --> 00:22:00,804
value.

411
00:22:01,025 --> 00:22:04,785
And I think, you know, you always hear stories
or anecdotes of generational companies being

412
00:22:04,785 --> 00:22:07,664
founded during tough times in the market or
during great times in the market.

413
00:22:07,664 --> 00:22:11,259
And so that's why able to commit and be
thoughtful and disciplined around investing

414
00:22:11,259 --> 00:22:14,480
through the cycle without trying to time, you
know, specific vintages.

415
00:22:14,859 --> 00:22:19,339
But again, you know, if you have that
perspective, which I just laid out, then, you

416
00:22:19,339 --> 00:22:22,779
know, it should be something that, you know, we
continue to do, you know, you know, no matter

417
00:22:22,779 --> 00:22:23,759
the market conditions.

418
00:22:24,174 --> 00:22:28,414
So the fame famous study, of course, is the
University of Chicago study that showed that

419
00:22:28,414 --> 00:22:31,875
52% of the time, top quartile persists in
venture capital.

420
00:22:32,255 --> 00:22:35,075
And it is very statistically significant over
many decades.

421
00:22:35,375 --> 00:22:42,269
What I worry about is that it's $20,000,000,000
venture funds.

422
00:22:42,269 --> 00:22:42,549
Mhmm.

423
00:22:42,549 --> 00:22:43,950
You know, how do you look at that?

424
00:22:43,950 --> 00:22:47,390
And do you believe that that level of
persistence will continue over the next 10, 20,

425
00:22:47,390 --> 00:22:48,109
30 years?

426
00:22:48,109 --> 00:22:48,509
Yes.

427
00:22:48,509 --> 00:22:52,154
Speaks to our certain our favorite disclaimer
on every presentation, past performance are not

428
00:22:52,154 --> 00:22:53,454
indicative of future results.

429
00:22:53,595 --> 00:22:57,694
Obviously, in certain cases, that that is not
the case, especially as it relates to venture.

430
00:22:57,835 --> 00:23:02,234
But, yeah, as you look at some of these firms
that that have grown and and raised significant

431
00:23:02,234 --> 00:23:06,339
pools of capital, have added different products
to their firm and their lineup.

432
00:23:06,639 --> 00:23:11,440
I think what it comes down to is, you know, for
us to make sure that our expectations in

433
00:23:11,440 --> 00:23:15,200
underwriting these managers are aligned with
are bucketed properly.

434
00:23:15,200 --> 00:23:15,359
Right?

435
00:23:15,359 --> 00:23:18,106
A $20,000,000,000 fund is not a venture capital
firm anymore.

436
00:23:18,106 --> 00:23:18,396
Right?

437
00:23:18,396 --> 00:23:21,591
It should almost be, by definition, a different
type of firm.

438
00:23:21,591 --> 00:23:27,110
And so, you know, as we look at what venture
capital is and what the role of venture capital

439
00:23:27,110 --> 00:23:31,176
is in a portfolio, you know, a $200,000,000
fund to $400,000,000 fund are fundamentally

440
00:23:31,176 --> 00:23:34,890
different than what a 10 or 20,000,000,000 fund
do for a portfolio.

441
00:23:34,890 --> 00:23:38,750
And so, you know, do we think that the
persistence of returns carries through

442
00:23:38,890 --> 00:23:40,429
different AUM levels?

443
00:23:40,569 --> 00:23:42,809
I I don't know if there's been work done on
that.

444
00:23:42,809 --> 00:23:45,769
It would be hard to believe that that would be
the case.

445
00:23:45,769 --> 00:23:47,924
I share some of those same concerns you do.

446
00:23:48,085 --> 00:23:51,365
And so I think, you know, at the end of the
day, what what that means is just making sure

447
00:23:51,365 --> 00:23:55,845
that, you know, our expectations are aligned
with what a fund, you know, is offering and

448
00:23:55,845 --> 00:23:58,664
making sure that there's not a mismatch of
expectations there.

449
00:23:58,725 --> 00:24:03,660
I worry that we're not gonna see a reversion in
asset gathering anytime soon.

450
00:24:03,660 --> 00:24:08,559
Specifically, from a tax policy standpoint, we
have people from all sorts of political

451
00:24:08,619 --> 00:24:12,779
spectrums, Republicans and Democrats, all
pushing to get get away with carried interest,

452
00:24:12,779 --> 00:24:17,954
which I think will have a lot of unintended
consequences when it comes to AUM and and asset

453
00:24:17,954 --> 00:24:19,095
gathering and everything.

454
00:24:19,234 --> 00:24:25,394
You know, today, smart GPS are able to forego
short term management fees in order to get long

455
00:24:25,394 --> 00:24:25,875
term carry.

456
00:24:25,875 --> 00:24:27,075
There's a tax incentive there.

457
00:24:27,075 --> 00:24:29,815
What happens when that tax incentive is taken
away?

458
00:24:29,980 --> 00:24:33,579
Unlike many of your peers, you demonstrate
incredible ability to have what crypto

459
00:24:33,579 --> 00:24:34,940
investors would call dime enhance.

460
00:24:34,940 --> 00:24:40,700
So to to hold through the most difficult
market, and you held all held and reop through

461
00:24:40,700 --> 00:24:42,399
2018, 2024.

462
00:24:42,815 --> 00:24:47,775
Very curious, how did that play out in your
portfolio continuing to invest throughout the

463
00:24:47,775 --> 00:24:50,115
bull market and then into the bear market as
well?

464
00:24:50,174 --> 00:24:54,174
We were investing through that period, you
know, committing to funds both new and and and,

465
00:24:54,174 --> 00:24:56,515
you know, existing GPs within the portfolio.

466
00:24:57,070 --> 00:25:01,650
Obviously, seeing the the value run up within
the portfolio across 2020 and 2021.

467
00:25:02,109 --> 00:25:06,769
There were some, you know, really remarkable
things happening in the market at that time,

468
00:25:06,990 --> 00:25:12,154
coming back down to earth a little bit, you
know, across 22 and 23 as valuations

469
00:25:12,154 --> 00:25:14,815
normalized, GPs took some write downs.

470
00:25:15,515 --> 00:25:18,095
You know, there was some rationalization within
the portfolio.

471
00:25:18,555 --> 00:25:22,634
There was a shifting from the underlying
portfolio companies, from a growth at all costs

472
00:25:22,634 --> 00:25:25,855
to a profitability and, you know, focus on cash
flow.

473
00:25:26,230 --> 00:25:29,750
You know, but but at the end of the day, we had
a very mature portfolio.

474
00:25:29,750 --> 00:25:32,569
We've been investing in the asset class since
19 nineties.

475
00:25:32,710 --> 00:25:36,149
And the result of that, what, you know, I think
we talked about this last time, was was net

476
00:25:36,149 --> 00:25:41,825
distributions, you know, back to our portfolio
in excess of capital calls for every year, you

477
00:25:41,825 --> 00:25:42,804
know, since 2019.

478
00:25:42,944 --> 00:25:46,944
And so, you know, some of the liquidity issues
that that some of other investors have talked

479
00:25:46,944 --> 00:25:50,144
about and, you know, in terms of lack of
liquidity, yes, it's certainly not been as

480
00:25:50,144 --> 00:25:55,079
robust as it was during 2020 and 2021, and
that's allowed us to to be consistent with our

481
00:25:55,159 --> 00:25:59,399
pacing and allocating to to, you know, to
different managers, you know, during that time

482
00:25:59,399 --> 00:25:59,899
period.

483
00:26:00,359 --> 00:26:05,740
I still think there's a long way to go with the
effects of of that time period, but I think

484
00:26:06,440 --> 00:26:10,375
there are some things happening right now in in
ventures, specifically around AI, that, you

485
00:26:10,375 --> 00:26:14,375
know, are are potentially waking, you know, the
space back up, which I think would be, you

486
00:26:14,375 --> 00:26:16,875
know, welcome for GPs and LPs alike.

487
00:26:16,934 --> 00:26:20,214
We talked about macro factors and whether you
wanna play macro investor.

488
00:26:20,214 --> 00:26:24,134
I think it's very foolish to try to time the
venture market for a couple of reasons.

489
00:26:24,134 --> 00:26:26,819
One is you've looked historically at returns.

490
00:26:27,279 --> 00:26:30,579
A lot of the returns actually come in the last
3, 4 years of the bull market.

491
00:26:31,119 --> 00:26:33,759
So the question is not whether the market will
go down.

492
00:26:33,759 --> 00:26:35,519
It's always gonna go up and go down.

493
00:26:35,519 --> 00:26:38,179
The question is, can you time it an exact way?

494
00:26:38,375 --> 00:26:44,775
And if you sold it in 2016, and then bought in
2023, you'd be worse off than if you just held

495
00:26:44,775 --> 00:26:45,174
it to that.

496
00:26:45,174 --> 00:26:48,795
So I think that's that that's a perilous
activity.

497
00:26:48,855 --> 00:26:53,019
The other thing is, I think a lot of venture
investors did not realize there are macro

498
00:26:53,019 --> 00:26:57,339
investors, that no matter what companies they
were picking, they were all either gonna be

499
00:26:57,339 --> 00:26:59,419
down or up based on macro conditions.

500
00:26:59,419 --> 00:27:03,579
And I think it's it's always foolish to try to
major in something that you're not studying and

501
00:27:03,579 --> 00:27:06,315
you're not you're not really keeping up with
with the public market.

502
00:27:06,394 --> 00:27:10,974
So I think, the prudent and the wise thing in
ventures to continue to deploy.

503
00:27:11,274 --> 00:27:15,934
Venture is one of those asset classes that's
has such a high return on average historically

504
00:27:16,154 --> 00:27:19,674
that if you just don't try to time the market,
you're gonna do quite well, especially as an

505
00:27:19,674 --> 00:27:20,654
institutional investor.

506
00:27:20,910 --> 00:27:21,150
Yeah.

507
00:27:21,150 --> 00:27:22,109
I I agree with that.

508
00:27:22,109 --> 00:27:27,230
I was, both very impressed and and very scared
for you to have all your asset all your private

509
00:27:27,230 --> 00:27:28,210
assets and venture.

510
00:27:28,430 --> 00:27:33,570
And we discussed whether you had any plans to
to diversify, your liquid portfolio.

511
00:27:33,710 --> 00:27:34,830
Have you given thought to that?

512
00:27:34,830 --> 00:27:35,330
And

513
00:27:35,595 --> 00:27:35,914
Yeah.

514
00:27:35,914 --> 00:27:39,755
We did talk about that, and and I think it's a
natural question and and one that that we

515
00:27:39,755 --> 00:27:40,954
constantly evaluate.

516
00:27:40,954 --> 00:27:41,194
Right?

517
00:27:41,194 --> 00:27:46,634
When I mentioned that the shift to this current
structure was made, you know, there was a lot

518
00:27:46,634 --> 00:27:52,180
of thought at the time given into, you know,
the potential impacts of pursuing such a setup.

519
00:27:52,320 --> 00:27:55,359
Look, at the end of the day, I alluded to this
earlier, and it's something that's very

520
00:27:55,359 --> 00:28:00,240
important for us, is that any decision we make
strategically around the portfolio is always

521
00:28:00,240 --> 00:28:04,080
done again in mind with the organization as a
whole, 1st and foremost.

522
00:28:04,080 --> 00:28:09,115
Will this benefit, and is this better for, you
know, the mission of KFF as a whole?

523
00:28:09,174 --> 00:28:12,375
And I think one of the things that we've
learned over the past 6 years, this period that

524
00:28:12,375 --> 00:28:16,855
we just talked about with some of the ups and
downs, is that, you know, while while we do

525
00:28:16,855 --> 00:28:21,130
have patient capital and have the ability, you
know, to see some of this through, you know,

526
00:28:21,130 --> 00:28:25,609
there's potentially the ability to to add
incremental value to our own portfolio by, you

527
00:28:25,609 --> 00:28:27,930
know, diversifying within the specific asset
class.

528
00:28:27,930 --> 00:28:31,130
You asked a, you know, very prescient question
earlier about, you know, how do you know you're

529
00:28:31,130 --> 00:28:31,950
actually diversified?

530
00:28:32,009 --> 00:28:36,404
And and I think, having such a large allocation
to venture, a lot of them trade on very similar

531
00:28:36,404 --> 00:28:36,904
factors.

532
00:28:37,205 --> 00:28:41,065
I think the understanding is that there's
potentially a way for us to incrementally

533
00:28:41,445 --> 00:28:46,244
improve the risk adjusted return of our private
portfolio by introducing some different types

534
00:28:46,244 --> 00:28:46,725
of exposure.

535
00:28:46,725 --> 00:28:48,345
And so that's something we are considering.

536
00:28:48,619 --> 00:28:51,980
You know, earlier, I talked about when the
decision was made to move away from that, a lot

537
00:28:51,980 --> 00:28:54,779
of the reasons why, you know, we felt it was
the right reason.

538
00:28:54,779 --> 00:28:57,820
And and those things haven't simply
disappeared, especially, you know, not having

539
00:28:57,820 --> 00:29:01,019
spent time in these markets for a long period
of time.

540
00:29:01,019 --> 00:29:05,005
You know, our our competitive advantage or our
edge in understanding, accessing, sourcing some

541
00:29:05,005 --> 00:29:07,025
of these managers is even worse than it was.

542
00:29:07,085 --> 00:29:11,484
You know, we do have the benefit of having a,
you know, blank slate within this small area of

543
00:29:11,484 --> 00:29:12,144
the portfolio.

544
00:29:12,445 --> 00:29:17,424
We also have the ability to understand, you
know, the existing structure of our portfolio

545
00:29:18,160 --> 00:29:22,480
and what types of exposures or investments
would be, you know, value additive.

546
00:29:22,480 --> 00:29:26,160
And so we can be much more intentional about
where we spend our time, you know, the types of

547
00:29:26,160 --> 00:29:27,359
managers that we evaluate.

548
00:29:27,359 --> 00:29:30,799
Again, we're not trying to meet with anyone and
everyone as it relates to, you know,

549
00:29:30,799 --> 00:29:33,794
potentially adding, you know, this new sleeve
within the portfolio.

550
00:29:33,794 --> 00:29:36,355
You know, importantly, again, though, this this
wouldn't be a massive overhaul.

551
00:29:36,355 --> 00:29:40,115
As I said, this is incrementally making
adjustments to the portfolio, you know, in

552
00:29:40,115 --> 00:29:43,414
service to the organization that will will suit
us better in the long run.

553
00:29:43,474 --> 00:29:48,410
How does an endowment like a KFF start
investing into a new asset class like buyout?

554
00:29:48,470 --> 00:29:51,829
Walk me through the process of investing into a
new asset class.

555
00:29:51,829 --> 00:29:55,029
This is something that we've not done a lot of
in the past.

556
00:29:55,029 --> 00:29:58,390
And, you know, again, I don't know that there's
a right way or a wrong way.

557
00:29:58,390 --> 00:30:00,569
Well, there probably is a wrong way to do it,
actually.

558
00:30:00,994 --> 00:30:03,015
But but in terms of Just start guessing.

559
00:30:03,315 --> 00:30:03,555
Yeah.

560
00:30:03,555 --> 00:30:03,955
Exactly.

561
00:30:03,955 --> 00:30:07,154
Just to fire away and throwing throwing darts.

562
00:30:07,154 --> 00:30:07,394
No.

563
00:30:07,394 --> 00:30:08,595
That's that's that's not what we're doing.

564
00:30:08,595 --> 00:30:10,855
But but much like anything, we talked about
this earlier.

565
00:30:11,075 --> 00:30:15,190
It's leveraging the the network we have, both
GPs and different asset classes within the

566
00:30:15,190 --> 00:30:19,509
portfolio, LPs, service providers, vendors,
etcetera, etcetera, people in our network,

567
00:30:19,750 --> 00:30:24,809
where we're able to talk, thoughtfully
evaluate, spend the time, take some meetings,

568
00:30:24,950 --> 00:30:29,585
you know, figure out, you know, what is of
interest, what is not, understand why,

569
00:30:29,644 --> 00:30:32,305
understand some of the driving factors behind
that.

570
00:30:32,365 --> 00:30:35,484
And then, again, you know, it's a word I've
used a lot, be very intentional about how

571
00:30:35,484 --> 00:30:38,525
we're, you know, evaluating and underwriting
all these specific investments.

572
00:30:38,525 --> 00:30:42,460
You know, have a pretty tight, you know, tight
circle around, you know, what we're looking for

573
00:30:42,460 --> 00:30:46,619
and what we need, not compromising on what that
looks like, you know, be it size, team,

574
00:30:46,619 --> 00:30:48,000
strategy, etcetera, etcetera.

575
00:30:48,380 --> 00:30:52,859
And then start to tow our way in, you know, to
make sure that we make an investment, we make

576
00:30:52,859 --> 00:30:56,805
another investment, you know, not put all our
eggs in one basket, but be thoughtful about

577
00:30:56,805 --> 00:30:58,105
building some of that exposure.

578
00:30:58,404 --> 00:31:01,765
And then, you know, again, being very, you
know, disciplined around evaluate self

579
00:31:01,765 --> 00:31:03,605
evaluation of of what that looks like.

580
00:31:03,605 --> 00:31:04,725
Is it performing as we hope?

581
00:31:04,725 --> 00:31:05,924
Is it delivering what we hope?

582
00:31:05,924 --> 00:31:09,490
It's not out of this question that there's a
world in which we evaluate this and it's

583
00:31:09,490 --> 00:31:13,009
performing as maybe we hoped, but, you know,
it's not doing what we wanted it to do.

584
00:31:13,009 --> 00:31:16,049
And so in that sense, we'd have to make a, you
know, another decision.

585
00:31:16,049 --> 00:31:19,490
But, you know, at the end of the day, you know,
the answer is is we're just deliberate and

586
00:31:19,490 --> 00:31:23,605
thoughtful about doing so and being really
intentional about how we spend our time, what

587
00:31:23,605 --> 00:31:27,544
we're looking for, and being disciplined
around, you know, making those decisions.

588
00:31:27,764 --> 00:31:29,684
You've been at KFF for 13 years.

589
00:31:29,684 --> 00:31:31,304
What do you wish you knew when you started?

590
00:31:32,325 --> 00:31:33,330
That's actually a really good question.

591
00:31:33,330 --> 00:31:33,990
One thing.

592
00:31:34,130 --> 00:31:34,289
Yeah.

593
00:31:34,289 --> 00:31:34,769
Yeah.

594
00:31:34,769 --> 00:31:36,390
As many as you'd like to add.

595
00:31:36,529 --> 00:31:37,029
Yeah.

596
00:31:37,170 --> 00:31:40,930
Jokingly, I'd say the the price of Bitcoin in
2024, you know, I don't know if that was

597
00:31:40,930 --> 00:31:41,569
the right answer.

598
00:31:41,569 --> 00:31:42,690
You said there's no right answer.

599
00:31:42,690 --> 00:31:43,650
That is the right answer.

600
00:31:43,650 --> 00:31:47,784
I think it's one of those things where I feel
so fortunate to be in this role, you know, at

601
00:31:47,784 --> 00:31:48,525
this organization.

602
00:31:48,585 --> 00:31:50,585
I think the the benefits are are immense.

603
00:31:50,585 --> 00:31:55,304
The ability to interact with, you know,
incredibly smart people across a wide range of,

604
00:31:55,304 --> 00:31:59,065
you know, both asset classes and disciplines,
you know, has been really, you know,

605
00:31:59,065 --> 00:32:01,079
instrumental on me as an investor.

606
00:32:01,159 --> 00:32:05,640
I think, you know, some of the lessons there
are lessons learned from mistakes made over the

607
00:32:05,640 --> 00:32:09,240
past, but, you know, as some people would say
is that those mistakes and learning those

608
00:32:09,240 --> 00:32:14,115
lessons are crucial and vital in terms of being
a better investor today.

609
00:32:14,115 --> 00:32:18,275
And so one answer might have been, hey, I would
have, you know, loved to avoid making mistake,

610
00:32:18,275 --> 00:32:19,075
you know, a, b, or c.

611
00:32:19,075 --> 00:32:23,315
But but if if I didn't avoid making mistake a,
b, or c, then I wouldn't have learned from

612
00:32:23,315 --> 00:32:27,654
those mistakes and and helped shape how I think
about the portfolio and investing today.

613
00:32:27,880 --> 00:32:31,400
And so, you know, there were a lot of lessons
learned over that period of time.

614
00:32:31,400 --> 00:32:33,319
You know, I feel like I've I've grown a ton.

615
00:32:33,319 --> 00:32:37,079
Just understanding that that this is, you know,
not an easy thing to do and and and, you know,

616
00:32:37,079 --> 00:32:41,994
making sure that you're patient making
decisions clear head with a consistent

617
00:32:41,994 --> 00:32:43,994
framework is is the most important thing.

618
00:32:43,994 --> 00:32:48,154
As I alluded to, focusing on process over
outcome for GPs is something we can do for

619
00:32:48,154 --> 00:32:51,994
ourselves too, making sure that the process is
done well, is done right, and, you know, the

620
00:32:51,994 --> 00:32:53,535
outcomes will take care of themselves.

621
00:32:54,309 --> 00:32:58,789
For somebody that's breaking into endowments,
and not literally, but figuratively, for

622
00:32:58,789 --> 00:33:03,670
somebody that's starting to work at endowments
in 1st couple of years, what are some meta

623
00:33:03,670 --> 00:33:04,070
skills?

624
00:33:04,070 --> 00:33:08,070
What are some skills and some practices that
somebody should do when they're starting out as

625
00:33:08,070 --> 00:33:09,210
an institutional investor?

626
00:33:09,615 --> 00:33:10,015
Yeah.

627
00:33:10,015 --> 00:33:10,894
A really good question.

628
00:33:10,894 --> 00:33:14,494
Again, I think, you know, each individual
organization is different in in in what it can

629
00:33:14,494 --> 00:33:14,815
provide.

630
00:33:14,815 --> 00:33:18,494
You know, for me, the way I did it is I, you
know, responded to every single email that that

631
00:33:18,494 --> 00:33:19,295
came into my inbox.

632
00:33:19,295 --> 00:33:20,894
I took a lot of meetings.

633
00:33:20,894 --> 00:33:22,974
You know, you know, you asked the question
about spending time.

634
00:33:22,974 --> 00:33:26,410
When I was, you know, 1, 2 years in, it was it
was meetings all the time.

635
00:33:26,410 --> 00:33:29,690
You know, getting those reps and understanding,
you know, how different people present

636
00:33:29,690 --> 00:33:33,529
different strategies, taking the reps just to
understand what to look for, what you like,

637
00:33:33,529 --> 00:33:34,269
what you don't.

638
00:33:34,410 --> 00:33:38,484
Asking questions, I think that's another thing
that, of course, is always an interesting thing

639
00:33:38,484 --> 00:33:40,005
is, you know, are there no dumb questions?

640
00:33:40,005 --> 00:33:43,125
And, you know, oftentimes, I found in the
beginning when I was young, I wouldn't

641
00:33:43,125 --> 00:33:45,444
understand a concept or it was being presented
a certain way.

642
00:33:45,444 --> 00:33:49,365
And the reality is is it was being sold, you
know, as you asked earlier, in a in a more

643
00:33:49,365 --> 00:33:50,164
complex structure.

644
00:33:50,164 --> 00:33:51,845
But at the end of the day, it's a much simple
concept.

645
00:33:51,845 --> 00:33:57,190
And just asking the question, and I think that
helps, you know, create dialogues between LPs

646
00:33:57,190 --> 00:34:02,329
and GPs, you know, asking questions to to
teammates, bosses, mentors that are, you know,

647
00:34:02,390 --> 00:34:05,289
much more experienced, longer time in the role.

648
00:34:05,734 --> 00:34:06,455
And then access.

649
00:34:06,455 --> 00:34:10,954
I think, again, this is one of the underrated
benefits of a seat, you know, at an endowment

650
00:34:11,015 --> 00:34:15,675
or a foundation or a, you know, nonprofit
institution is, you know, access to different

651
00:34:15,894 --> 00:34:17,094
banks, vendors, funds.

652
00:34:17,094 --> 00:34:18,695
Being an asset owner opens a lot of doors.

653
00:34:18,695 --> 00:34:21,590
You know, in the beginning, I was not naive
enough to the fact people don't want to talk to

654
00:34:21,590 --> 00:34:21,670
me.

655
00:34:21,670 --> 00:34:23,510
They like talking to the name on the door, and
that's okay.

656
00:34:23,510 --> 00:34:24,730
And I was fine with that.

657
00:34:24,789 --> 00:34:28,630
And, you know, understanding that, you know,
that is something that should not be looked

658
00:34:28,630 --> 00:34:29,349
upon poorly.

659
00:34:29,349 --> 00:34:29,670
Right?

660
00:34:29,670 --> 00:34:34,070
I I think, you know, taking advantage of that
to ask questions, get smarter, meet really

661
00:34:34,070 --> 00:34:37,726
interesting people, develop relationships that
will serve you later on down the line.

662
00:34:37,726 --> 00:34:41,175
You know, one of the other things is that, you
know, it's a it's a pretty small industry and,

663
00:34:41,175 --> 00:34:43,594
you know, often there's 1 or 2 or 3 degrees of
separation.

664
00:34:43,894 --> 00:34:49,940
It's also, you know, I find an area where a lot
of people spend long periods of time in their

665
00:34:49,940 --> 00:34:50,179
career.

666
00:34:50,179 --> 00:34:53,539
And so point being is that a relationship
developed in year 1, 2, 3.

667
00:34:53,539 --> 00:34:54,739
You never know where that leads.

668
00:34:54,739 --> 00:34:57,539
And it's amazing how people, you know, end up
at different places.

669
00:34:57,539 --> 00:35:00,099
There's different, you know, paths cross at
different times.

670
00:35:00,099 --> 00:35:04,175
And so, you know, working on networking,
building relationships, maintaining

671
00:35:04,175 --> 00:35:07,715
relationships, being authentic, all of that is
something that I would, you know, encourage,

672
00:35:07,775 --> 00:35:12,195
you know, a younger person to do, you know,
take advantage of what these seats provide.

673
00:35:12,735 --> 00:35:16,869
And also, you know, maybe lastly, just don't
lose focus of the work you're doing on behalf

674
00:35:16,869 --> 00:35:20,630
of the organization that you're working for,
which is oftentimes really impactful and

675
00:35:20,630 --> 00:35:23,690
important and, you know, again, should not be
taken for granted.

676
00:35:23,829 --> 00:35:25,190
You mentioned asking questions.

677
00:35:25,190 --> 00:35:30,835
Unfortunately, I think this is a big liability
of the Western Western Education System is the

678
00:35:30,835 --> 00:35:33,974
punishing of asking questions, the punishing of
not knowing the right answers.

679
00:35:34,275 --> 00:35:40,934
The entire concept of a right answer in these
highly evolving industries is a very dangerous,

680
00:35:41,635 --> 00:35:45,635
very dangerous concept in general because the
right answer today might be completely wrong

681
00:35:45,635 --> 00:35:47,230
answer, next quarter.

682
00:35:47,449 --> 00:35:51,130
You have to build the confidence to actually
ask simple questions over your career.

683
00:35:51,130 --> 00:35:53,630
It's it's a it's a paradox of sorts.

684
00:35:54,409 --> 00:35:57,869
You mentioned building your network and being
investor.

685
00:35:58,905 --> 00:36:04,285
To me, it feels like being an LP is could
oftentimes be a siloed position.

686
00:36:04,585 --> 00:36:09,065
How do you get out of kind of this siloed
positions and network with your with your peers

687
00:36:09,065 --> 00:36:10,559
and network with with other people?

688
00:36:10,640 --> 00:36:14,960
It just takes a little bit of work, you know,
going to conferences, you know, annual meetings

689
00:36:14,960 --> 00:36:18,880
for existing or prospective managers, you know,
introducing yourselves to to LPs.

690
00:36:18,880 --> 00:36:22,640
What I found, and and again, this comes back to
that last point, is that oftentimes a lot of

691
00:36:22,640 --> 00:36:27,114
LPs have similar questions or have similar
perspectives, and and people are hesitant to

692
00:36:27,114 --> 00:36:27,514
share.

693
00:36:27,514 --> 00:36:30,554
And that that creates kind of a gap between
between people.

694
00:36:30,554 --> 00:36:34,875
And I found that one of the the best recipes
for doing that is being open, being willing to,

695
00:36:34,875 --> 00:36:37,034
you know, have discussions, identify issues.

696
00:36:37,034 --> 00:36:37,275
Right?

697
00:36:37,275 --> 00:36:40,570
Everyone sometimes, you know, everyone says
everything's going great and, you know, sitting

698
00:36:40,570 --> 00:36:43,690
in the same seat on, you know, a different
organization, opening up about, you know,

699
00:36:43,690 --> 00:36:46,570
things that are challenging, I think just
builds a natural rapport with people.

700
00:36:46,570 --> 00:36:50,269
And but, yeah, I I think, like anything, it's
something you have to put the work into.

701
00:36:50,484 --> 00:36:50,804
Absolutely.

702
00:36:50,804 --> 00:36:54,085
Well, thanks so much for taking the time to
jump on the podcast.

703
00:36:54,085 --> 00:36:55,385
Look forward to seeing you soon.

704
00:36:55,445 --> 00:36:55,764
Great.

705
00:36:55,764 --> 00:36:56,244
David, thanks.

706
00:36:56,244 --> 00:36:57,125
This was a lot of fun.

707
00:36:57,125 --> 00:36:58,824
And, I look forward to keeping in touch.

708
00:36:59,015 --> 00:36:59,594
Thanks, Dean.

709
00:37:00,295 --> 00:37:01,434
Thank you for listening.

710
00:37:01,494 --> 00:37:06,215
The 10x Capital podcast now receives more than
a 170,000 downloads per month.

711
00:37:06,215 --> 00:37:09,195
If you are interested in sponsoring, please
email me at david@10xcapital.com.